Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
SINN FÉIN’S PRESIDENTIAL candidate Martin McGuinness has blamed “West Brit elements” in the media and in political parties for consistent references to his history of involvement in the IRA.
Speaking to Newstalk’s Chris Donoghue at the National Ploughing Championships in Co Kildare, McGuinness said he respected that there would be people who would “try to muddy the waters” regarding his previous activity.
“My faith is with the people… there are West Brit elements, in and around Dublin – some of them are attached to some sections of the media, others are attached to political parties and were formerly involved in political parties.
I say to all of them: I go forward on my record. My record as a peacemaker, I think, is unequalled. Anywhere.
McGuinness added that he would not have been invited to the Oval Office, South Africa, Iraq, Sri Lanka or the Basque Country “if there were any question marks whatsoever over my work as a peacemaker.”
Advertisement
His previous involvement in the IRA, he said, had been “said by people who are hostile to my candidacy.”
In a nod to Fianna Fáil’s decision not to field a candidate of its own, the Sinn Féin MLA said he would be appealing to voters “who previously supported other political parties to rally to my flag.
“They have got a very important choice to make about who presents the new Ireland,” he said.
“I certainly do represent the new North – and I think I can represent all of Ireland in a way that brings great credit to the Irish people.”
McGuinness’s presidential chances were boosted earlier when Fianna Fáil’s parliamentary party agreed not to allow members nominate individual candidates – meaning that Dana and David Norris now have little hope of securing the support they need to be nominated.
Earlier, Labhrás Ó Murchú said he was withdrawing his candidacy in order to avoid causing any further friction within Fianna Fáil.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
While I do agree with the idea of bringing Sinn Féin into the fold and moving towards them becoming a normal political party, I can’t but feel that there is something deeply wrong with Ireland if the former head of the Army Council can get on a ballot ahead of David Norris.
I find myself in the unusual position of being a supporter of Martin McGuinness and yet I have been called a “West Brit” most of my life. I take it as a compliment even though most people are hopelessly confused and muddled as to it’s meaning.
For those of you who don’t know what a West Brit is, here are the relevant points that McGuinness is alluding to:
> Taking a view of Irish history which highlights perceived positive aspects of British influence in Ireland, or criticizing Irish nationalist rebellions
>Cultural cringe: following British popular culture, while appearing embarrassed by or disdainful of aspects of Irish culture, such as the Irish language, Gaelic games or Irish traditional music
>Opposition or indifference to a United Ireland (see Partitionism) or to Irish republicanism
>Support (or alleged support) for neo-Unionism
I used to follow every twist and turn of the then nascent Peace Process in Ireland in the 1990s and then read pretty much everything there was to read about the conflict in Northern Ireland, euphemistically referred to as The Troubles.
Back then the Irish Times, The Irish Independent and the Sunday Independent were vociferously opposed to Sinn Fein (frequently called Sinn Fein/IRA) participating in talks or seeking any concessions as they were unrepentant terrorists who having failed to bomb and murder their way to a 32 county socialist republic, were now engaged in cynical subterfuge and that the Peace Process was an elaborate ploy and they were incapable of changing their irredentist ways.
John Hume was frequently an object of ridicule and derision in the Irish media for being naive to think that Sinn Fein could be brought in from the cold. The policy back then was Stalinist (not surprising as a lot of Stalinist stickies were in RTE at the time under Eoghan Harris) to literally censor Sinn Fein from the airwaves.
Sections of the media are still hopelessly hostile to Sinn Fein and to them they will always be terrorists masquerading as democrats.
I used to loathe Sinn Fein, the IRA and their fellow travellers, partly because I spent so much time as a teenage reading agitprop from the Irish and British media which was hopelessly flawed, biased, ahistorical and partisan in their coverage.
It wasn’t until I managed to maintain a sober, objective and impartial analysis of the conflict in Northern Ireland that I eventually came to the same conclusion as the presbyterian minister who recently called McGuinness “one of the great leaders of modern times”
Most people accept Nelson Mandela, a personal hero of mine and many others, as an inspirational statesman yet in his autobiography he admitted that as leader of the military wing of the ANC, the Spear of the Nation, he sanctioned a bombing in 1983 which resulted in 19 civilians were killed.
People change and conflicts end. We can either masochistically live in the past and go backwards or move forward to a brighter and prosperous future.
Ireland is now a bankrupt country with huge unemployment & grinding poverty. Tax-payer funded people in the public eye should lead by example.
McGuinness is doing this by offering to take the average industrial wage yet the very venal, rapacious and grasping media personalities and politicians that have the audacity to slam him continue to gorge like greedy pigs at the trough that is paid for by public money.
This is precisely why the media and politicians are demonising him in a concerted effort as the established is simply scared of him.
Tremendous post Willy – I think you enunciate the evolving zeitgeist in Ireland very well. The old certainties of the 26 counties (pro-Europe and rejection of overt nationalism, soft neo-unionism, considering the north as different and separate from the south as the Sokoto province of Nigeria) have been shaking and questioned. These huge economy problems rumbling throughout Europe are really showing us who our real friends are and maybe the boys and girls of 1916 and the national revival movement were on to something. I haven’t seen many politicians get out in front this tidal wave of change in a positive way. I believe many people are looking back to the unfulfilled promise of the 1916 proclamation and the Sinn Fein is, despite what the same old talking heads say, is well positioned to finally deliver Robert Emmet an epitaph.
Oh holy mother of god. For the party with the best media training I am surprised they haven’t operated on his vocal chords to prevent him from saying “West Brit”.
What an utterly moronic statement…
Muireann, let’s hope the media will begin to do the same with the numerous Labour elected reps who are ex-members of the so-called “Official IRA”.
And what about Gilmore and Rabbitte’s past as ex-members of that groups political wing, known as “Official Sinn Féin” and later the Workers Party. Gilmore joined in 1975. The OIRA were still killing people at this time and in 1977 they killed IRSP Wicklow County Councillor Seamus Costello.
Let’s hope Gilmore and numerous other Labour TD’s links with the OIRA are investigated
For the record – I have no problem with him being questioned about his past. You’ve misinterpreted my statement. The problem is that media hosts have an inherent bias against McGuinness – You can hear it in their tone. Listen to Joe Duffy on liveline today where McGuinness won the poll – He was scornful towards it.
So once again – No problem with being questioned on his past – But just see that he is not being given a fair shake of the whip – and at least also address the positive role he has played in the peace process, and improving life in the north.
@ Cillian, he will now represent every Sinn Fein person South of the border, going by the last Election, if Gerry Adams can get to the Dail then I don’t see why he hasn’t got a chance of winning.
Martin McGuinness for President? Are we all out of our minds? His past as an IRA leader cannot be ignored. This is the IRA who killed and maimed and raked the MONEY in the name of “Republicanism”. Not the IRA of 1916 or of the war of independence. This is the IRA who killed indiscriminately, women, men, children, people who were mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, grandparents, cousins, some of who are still missing in our name. I’m all for peace and the peace process but we cannot put a terrorist as our head of state! Yes he would be our head of state!!!! Come on people a little bit of sanity here! “It is Rank It Smells To Heaven”.
@Katie. An hysterical response! I’d advise you go read about the conflict, indeed push your reading on back to the Rising and then come back with a more informed opinion.
Do you know what happened in West Cork in the 1920s???
I can’t understand people who make the above statement. They have no clue of Irish history. What happened to English people after the war was a digrace but hey if you don’t know, it never happened!!!
This is not about McGuinness’ fitness for the post or otherwise… it is about him calling anyone Irish who questions his history a "west Brit" … He adds insult to…murder.
So if you suggest that having a former terrorist boss as President is inappropriate, you’re a West Brit? I’m not a West Brit, I just happen to have compassion for the many innocent victims of the IRA and other terrorist organisations. And if Sinn Fein have moved on, why is that they continue to sell IRA t-shirts and other IRA branded items on their website?? http://www.sinnfeinbookshop.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=303&osCsid=052b149b71f27773fe00420eb5d66864
Calling McGuinness a terrorist is just narcissistic vigilantism. For a start, the word is an increasingly meaningless propaganda term and it is telling that people use it without knowing this.
For a start we have had “terrorists” as taoiseachs and presidents. Michael Collins was a “terrorist”.
The Wehrmarcht used to call the French Resistance “terrorists”.
Actually we have “terroritsts” in government here – here’s a clue, the modern Labour party who are, scions of?The Democratic Left! Who are scions of? The Workers Party! Who are scions of? Sinn Fein The Workers Party! Who are scions of?The Official IRA.
The transition from guns to government happened here too.
As Kofi Annan said, “one persons terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter”.
Or as Brendan Beehan said “Brendan Behan said people who drop small bombs are terrorists; people who drop big bombs are governments”.
Nelson Mandela was called by the US government “one of the world’s more notorious terrorists”.
I would suggest that people here read Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky or read his observations about the use of the word terrorist.
If you don’t like reading books here is a nice over-view. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_model
I would also recommend the book Dinging with Terrorists by Phil Rees – he suggests that the word should be dropped from intelligent discourse altogether.
The IRA were a paramilitary force engaged in guerilla activities during what was called a “low-intensity” conflict. Violence doesn’t happen in a vacuum.
The usual fertile breeding ground of poverty, inequality, state oppression and a lack of genuine democracy are what inculcates it. By any reasonable measure, Northern Ireland of the 60s and 70s fitted this description.
Unlike a lot of the self-serving careerist politicians here where Albert Reynolds notoriously flicked a coin to decide to join Fianna Fail or Fine Gael, Martin McGuinness entered politics out of conviction, idealism and a belief that a better world could be created.
By deciding to volunteer in the IRA it could mean prison or death. Rather different than the a greasy cute-hoor who are out to enrich themselves at the tax-payers expense on the Dail Eireann gravy-train and have bankrupted the country and haved handed over the keys to the ECB and the IMF.
It is easy to sneer and bleat about violence from the comfort of your smartphone in 2011 but you are not an oppressed and impoverished minority in a sectarian dysfunctional state that illegally used violence to suppress democracy.
If any of the useful idiots of the establishment and the golden circles here knew anything (read Ed Moloneys A Secret History of the IRA for a start along with that Chomsky book) they would then realise that both Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.
McGuinness has demonstrated that he is capable of letting go of the past and is capable of creating a secular, inclusive, modern country that values equality for the benefit of all it’s citizens.
Martin’s sounding a little tetchy so early into the campaign, he must know that hes going to get a very rough ride (and rightly so) from those whom are fundamentally opposed to a convicted terrorist seeking the highest office in the land.
yes i know its double standards to say its acceptable to have him in office in NI but not in the ROI but the two are poles apart.
I have 6 unionist friends that have nothing but contempt for people like you, your double standards and moralizing, not caring what happened to either side, just scoring points to protect the golden circle in Irish politics.
We have had enough of your type driving this state in to poverty over the last 90 years. “We have had enough of your past give us our future”, to quote a previous SF elected rep. and IRA man.
Tony your Facebook profile is a joy to behold, your photo’s are either Shinner election posters or girls with their boobs out. Your day really will come.
Tony, i could care less for golden circles or existing political parties or ideologies, i do however object to being represented by terrorists and their apologists or any hue.
we keep being asked to move on and that the past is the past and at the same time being asked to vote for those whom were actively involved with those crimes.
If SF want to ever be considered as a viable option by me and many others they need to promote the newer generation of leaders such as Doherty (or even MLM) and not keep perpetuating the Marty & Gerry cult.
Right, put it like this – rather than have a President who will come out with hugely embarrassing and undignified guff like ‘West Brits’ I may as well vote for my cat who will at least keep his mouth shut.
Why is he alienating swing voters who have legitimate concerns about his past, the only people who use this kind of language or agree with the sentiment are already going to vote for him . Not very wise electioneering
I am 100% Irish and I am proud to be a cultural nationalist. Just because I believe that he is not suitable for the job and question his murderous past does not mean that he has any right to insult me or any other Irishman who is of the same opinion. Great tactic to win votes – not.
I like when people use the term “West Brit”. Sure sign that you’re dealing with an intellectual pygmy right there. It’s the language of throwbacks who would keep us firmly in the past. Most of us bear no ill will to English people and have long shed the chip on the shoulder. Sad that some seem determined to keep banging the same drum even in 2011.
@Claire. No one has mentioned any ill will against English people.
Unfortunately for you we will keep "banging the drum" as you put it until we have secured what is rightfully ours , an independent 32 county Republic.
When you say “ours” – are you including the people who overwhelmingly voted in 1998 to remove our constitutional claim to the six counties, hmmm? I mean, I’m sure a fine patriot like yourself knows the Constitution back to front, but here’s a link to the relevant amendment in case the log in your eye prevents you finding it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteenth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland
Anyway, my point was – it has been voted on. The vast majority simply do not agree with you. Move on.
@Paul – you have no right to a 32 county republic. you need make a persuasive peaceful argument for such a thing – have yet to hear anybody try. Why should there be one?
It is disgraceful that he is even being considered. It’s well and good him saying that his IRA membership was ‘in the past’ as if we should forget about it – but what about the victims of his organisation’s campaign?? Should we forget about them too? I’m a republican and believe in a unified Ireland by peaceful means. Mc Guinness should be subjected to a full campaign of media scrutiny and his involvement with the IRA should never be forgotten.
Republicans believe in a united Ireland but they also believe that everyone should be treated equally in a Republic. Liberty, Fraternity, equality. That is the key difference. When we look at this state and see how FG/Lab/FF allowed 35,000 children to be raped at an industrial level, how they have allowed the country to be robbed blind again and again, then you have to wonder how the feck could they not think that this country was run by people who are radically opposed to the good of the Irish people.
The question is do we want to be a normal country or do we want to maintain the FG/Lab/FF kleptocracy. People look at McDowell on TV last night, do you think that he wants to change Ireland. His party kept Ahern in for 13 years, and Haughey before it, they just wanted bargaining power. It is why Joe Duffy on 500k a year went ape on hearing McGuinness is running, why he is mild FG but mad FF. Where else in the western world would the likes of Joe Duffy or Pat Kenny etc etc etc get those kind of wages.
They have a lot to fear in Ireland being run like a normal country.
Actually, what is Martin’s record with the IRA? Could he claim compensation for deafness from his army ? All those nasty bullets and bombs must have played havoc with his poor auld ear drums.
He will never shake the IRA tag but i dont have a problem with him running just like i dont have an objection to Norris running. At the end of the day the people will decide and who knows a few controversial candidates might make people get off their arse and vote this time.
I wont vote for McGuinness purely based on his IRA association regardless if it was in the past or not. Its that straightforward for me.
McGuinness has no formal education and so is unsuitable for President. He trained as a Butcher’s assistant and then applied his trade as a terrorist. There are many suitably qualified Peacemakers available to do the job. McGuinness is just a good salesman with big ideas. He has done some good work in NI but it is as a PR man and a negotiator. We need more than that from our President.
How can there be so much scrutiny of David Norris and not of McGuinness? If he wants to be given the chance to become head of state of this country his credentials must stack up. How could we even consider electing a mass murderer as President of this country? As for talk of “legitimate targets” – that is exactly the reason why every rock of his past should be overturned. This country needs to get a grip of itself.
Agreed, Sinn Fein are more than entitled to put forward a candidate as a political party but I would be horrified at the idea of that man representing us as the president of this country. I don’t know how any of you can support him based on his political ideals when he would be greeting world leaders with the blood of his own people on his hands. So far I don’t see anyone fit for the job except Michael D Higgins, he seems to be the only gentleman in a fools contest.
Are you both denying that people on either side and innoccent people who had chosen no side were killed while McGuinness was senior member of the IRA? Really? If your going to patronise her at least back up your smug quips with something resembling an argument.
Thanks Colin. I wasn’t going to bother responding. You have obviously also noticed the many constructive comments Paul Houston has in this thread. I’m fully up to speed on my history thanks which is why I feel so strongly about this issue. Judging by the “thumbs down” you have Paul I’m guessing I’m not the only one.
So apparently if you believe murdering civilians is not a justified method to achieve a political aspiration then you are automatically a West Brit. I better get out my union jack so…
Pat Kenny , yesterday and today on TV and radio . Joe Duffy yesterday – no balance whatsoever by Duffy on RTE Radio 1.
McDowell being rolled out with his blatant blueshift hatred on TV last night, will convert more and more voters towards electing Martin!
Who is Michael McDowell anyway ? and where oh where are his PD’s ?
Keep it up certain Journalists – the more that you scream that he is not entitled to run, the more number ones he will get!
Dick Spring and his Journalist friends tried the same nonsense here in Kerry and got his answer – wrecked his own career and Martin Ferris is now in his third term as a hard working TD.
Eddie, what exactly do you want? The media to quiz him on his fly-fishing? As much as the other candidates are disliked, boring, etc. none of the them commanded a reign of terror or caused untold suffering to victims and their families. Personally, I find him beneath contempt and it would sicken me if he became president. I’m no fan of Dnan, Gay Mitchell, et al but I could live with their winning the election.
I agree Eddie, McDowell was given free reign and allowed to monopolise the ‘debate’. The poor chap from TCD who was there to provide balance was hardly allowed to open his mouth. In my mind debate involves listening to multiple opinions and using reason and evidence to argue your points something which large elements of the Irish media are not in favour of. Here is a link to the so called ‘debate’ if anyone’s interested
As a political point…you don’t win elections by rallying your support base. You win it by converting the marginals and undecided. This comment is a bad to start to his campaign.
@Derek Byrne, you’re spot on. With comments like he’s making the mistake of playing to his own supporters that are going to vote for him anyway and alienating the very people that could help win. A schoolboy error by a supposedly seasoned politician.
It’s a pity you can’t change this as there are always a few annoying typos. Anyway……
@ Mack O’Connell – surely you mean working class as opposed to classes? However in Marxist terms,given what is happening to the global economy, we are all working class now. Perhaps you mean the lumpenproletariat?
@ Tommy Tomato This is de-ja vu all over again.Before, during & after the IRA ceasefire the past of McGuiness was combed over by the media & unionists. He was the “godfather of godfathers” in the Provos. And so what?
We’ve already had a precedent of having IRA men who have executed unarmed policemen in cold blood as taoiseachs & presidents.
If you accept the peace process with McGuinness as Deputy First Minister of NI, then logically & morally,you accept him as President.
Why is it acceptable for the Unionist community to be consigned to accepting McGuinness having serious executive powers ( as opposed to the overly glorified ceremonial role that is President here) yet if we are asked to do the same we suddenly find his paramilitary activities distasteful ?
Your logic is actually de-facto sectarian ( I know you are not sectarian personally but your logic is) , i.e, well the Prods up the north can like it or lump it but if we in the south are asked to have a former IRA chief-of-staff involved in the running of the state here…………heavens no!
This country,it’s people & it’s media actually make no sense. Historical amnesia, hilarious hypocrisy & double-standards abound.
Isn’t the whole beauty of democracy that if enough of the population want someone, then they’ll get them? In the north, there’s enough nationalists / republicans to ensure that Sinn Fein are a powerful party. I don’t believe that this is the case down south and so I believe he doesn’t stand much of a chance of being elected, particularly if he maintains such a confrontational attitude to valid questions being raised about his past.
Also, there’s a difference between “accepting” someone as president, and actually voting for someone. If he does manage to win, while I wouldn’t like it, I would accept it. That’s the whole idea of democracy.
Martin McGuinness asked us to judge him on his record as a peacemaker. Well Mr. McGuinness, you also have a record as a terrorist. On many occasions McGuinness referred to the war in the northern counties. If that were the case and there was a war over the 30 years of troubles, therefore mcGuinness should be tried for war crimes under the terms of the Geneva Convention.
I’d rather be considered a west Brit (which, let’s face it, is only an insult if you consider being British to be "bad") than to have blood on my hands.
It’s well documented that there were many discussions between Dublin and London regarding partition and the creation of an Independent Irish state long before the rising. The ringleaders of the rising grew impatient, and fighting broke out. They knew damn well that their deaths would bring it about a lot sooner than London would have liked. Most ordinary people loathed the notion of the rebellion and just wanted to get on with their day to day lives. Dev was a headcase who knew nothing of how a country should be run, but had plenty powerful, dangerous allies and a way with words. Collins was a fighter who had no place in politics.
The whole thing was a badly managed farce.
The peace rallies in the North were spoiled by the events of Bloody Sunday, driving fresh recruits into the hands of an eagerly awaiting IRA who grew exponentially after that day. The tit for tat war that went on between the IRA, british police, secret service, military and unionist paramilitaries cared not one jot about the innocent casualties.
Blowing up Mountbatten’s boat (SOUTH OF THE BORDER, where the IRA swore they would never involve themselves in military activity) served as nothing but fuel to the British fire. Ironic, considering, he was in favour of a peaceful end to the struggle in the North and was one of the few royals with real influence, due to his status as a war hero. He might even have helped negotiate a deal. Its well documented that he wanted to get involved in bringing peace to the North.
Roll on the Brighton bombing. What else was Maggie gonna do but get her back up?? She knew feck all about the troubles in the North, and after that didn’t want to know. Send in more troops. The IRA are scum. She was a tough bird that the RA rubbed up completely the wrong way.
Enniskillen, Omagh, the murder of Garda Gerry McCabe in Adare. The list goes on.
At least Adams roots were in the civil rights movement. He wanted to negotiate peace. he wanted the hunger strikes stopped. He saw the futility of fighting long before a ceasefire was ever called.
McGuinness was a scumbag who had a talent for violence and very efficiently despatched people. He was very, very good at it.
And now the man that knew more than any of us what went on behind the scenes of these acts of treason on mankind, Catholic or Protestant wants to be the head of this State?
Funny how the history books and media give one side of a story. There are lines between which the truth can be extracted too.
We’d still be Brits. Please! Pipe down, ya Fenian feckwitt!
@Claire. Yes that’s true , certainly if you are a partitionist. Remember partition flew in the face of the great majority of the Irish people so was a fundamentally undemocratic construct pushed through under the threat of immediate and terrible war. What does your map of Ireland look like ? Mine has all 32 counties.
Mine too. When I visit the 6 I quickly realize it’s a different place – clean, looked after, no free for all housing development. Wish we had some of that in the 26.
Well done Mr. McGuinness on alienating a healthy portion of the electorate you are depending on…….. you’re not getting my vote because I have a good memory and don’t like your old job title, and nobody ever accused me of being a “West Brit” yet.
Never did vote Charlie Haughey either, cos I remembered his old track record.
The wheel is always turning, and if you’re running for public office, expect your past to come bite you in the arse, Norris found that out the hard way didn’t he? Or should we just ignore your personal history?
No one would question that the IRA engaged in acts of disgusting savagery. It should also be remembered that The Provisional IRA didn’t just jump into existence one Tuesday afternoon in the late 60s because they happened to be bored. They arose from the oppression that was felt in Catholic communities in the North, young people seen civil rights marchers massacred by British Soldiers and many seen violence as the only option at the time. McGuinness is a product of that generation. That does not condone the murder of civilians or bombing but it certainly puts into context the arena the P.I.R.A operated in. It is quite clear that supporting the G.F.A and recognizing the authority of the P.S.N.I and going so far as to call former comrades “traitors” in condemning the murders of British Soldiers and P.S.N.I officers that Mr McGuinness is committed to peace. Both Fianna Fail and Fine Gael’s history is steeped in violence also and people who romanticize the “good old IRA” and condemn the P.I.R.A are hypocrites. McGuinness should be judged on his presidential policies like DeValera was.
McGuinness is the only candidate that has a criminal record and was found with bomb making material and bullets in his car. He is the only one connected to people that have killed people. Do you want him president?
McGuinness was interviewed on BBC One Northen Ireland last night. Pity many people south of ther border did not see it. He failed utterly to answer the hard questions. It was a disastrous interview by McGuinness.
Ya he was interviewed on BBC radio and called the interviewee pro unionist and then hung up( claimed he lost the signal) when questioned bout his IRA membership.
So he’s happy to be questioned bout his past as long as the past two or three years.
On the one hand, McGuinness is more than happy to accept plaudits from Protestant clergymen, as the recent SF ard fheis showed, while on the other hand he reverts to old sectarian cliches which were attached to many of the Protestant congregations in the South. The mask slipped for a moment and the old unreconstructed McGuiness popped out. Ah yes, ‘they haven’t gone away’ is right.
I know no Protestant that I would call a West Brit, I know several that are in SF with me.
A West Brit is not about religion, it is a reference to people who are in effect British Nationalists, a grouping that no longer exists in Britain.
Outside of the conflict in the North, there are many people here that are not comfortable with anything to do with Irish identity or self-determination. They are nearly always catholics, that is the papes 4 ya.
People tend to forget how nationlists where treated in the north in the late 60s, and off the roughly 1500 people killed by the IRA 1000 of them where british soilders which where legitamate targets, where as the british army and loyalist organisations killed a far greater % off civilians than the ira
I winced when McDowell last night mentioned once seeing a piece of paper in some folder he was in possession of which suggested that SF were considering running a candidate in this election. How he so readily shared such memories of what he saw while in government.. I wonder if he’d be so willing to share with the public the stuff contained in the files of his own party at that time.. the conniving bollix.
You’ll never see him condemn Ahern or anything that went on in the last Govt. and how he kept them there no matter what, as long as his ass was on the cabinet seat. I would love to see the donor list of the PD’s. It would read like an index of NAMA loans and Anglo Irish bankrupts.
I’m not sure if Sinn Fein actually believe they can win this, but love ‘em or loathe ‘em, you can’t deny that its raising their profile no end. Populist stunts like only taking the average wage will win McGuinness even more support among the working classes.
It is not a populist stunt. No elected SF representative takes more than the average industrial wage – the balance goes back to constituent services. Do a little research before writing again. And not on the BBC (although I have to admit BBC is sometimes less biased against SF than RTE)
@Sligo Sinn Fein
There is legislation that states that no individual can donate more than 6,500euro to a political party. SIPO regulates this, yet SIPO have said that they have no knowlage of any payments above this amount by SF TD’s.
how does this work exactly? A few journalists have asked SF this question, but they don’t seem to get any answers.
It would help to clarify this as many have said that it doesn’t really matter if SF TD’s take average wage, because they still cost us the taxpayers the exact same amount as FG, Lab and FF TD.
He is happy to take our tax money but not pay tax here.
As for you Sligo Sinn fein they accept full pay from the exchequer and give excess of industrial wage to the party. So they accept FULL PAY from the tax payer.
Sure the bank raid is still floating about. The CAB reckons the Ra is turning over nice profits from criminal activity. But ye wouldn’t know anything about that.
I suppose I should clarify and say that I am not nor never have been a Sinn Fein voter or supporter.
I would have some admiration for James Connolly but personally I wouldn’t condone or support the IRA campaign of 1916-21 and 1969-1994.
I can of course see the causes of conflict in both though and I would never start screaming in a condescending moralising tone about terrorism and murder. It’s asymmetric warfare.
I can also see glaring double-standards in venerating one and condemning the other and also expecting northern unionists to grin and bear it with Martin in power whilst down here we tut-tut in a disapproving manner at some uppity Nordie.
I can also recognise the characteristics of a manufactured media-witch hunt too when it serves certain interests, like we saw with the reactionary and hysterical lynching by a homophobic and conservative media of an excellent candidate and politician in the form of David Norris.
I also recognise first-rate politician with integrity, idealism and statesman like behaviour when I see it and Martin McGuinness uniquely has it.
“West Brits” indeed. What next, provonistas daubing Dublin’s walls with ‘West Brits Out’ McGuinness and SF do love a good conspiracy. He just doesn’t want to talk about his past and blaming the ‘West Brits’ for the fact that he HAS a terrorist past is not going to wash. That said I have no problem with him being on the ballot paper and it is highly unlikely he will win anyway. The people will get to have their say and I don’t think language like that is going to endear him to many along the east coast in particular where the majority of the population just happen to live!
He should stick to what he has been doing, far more productive than being president which is really a non job devoid of any power or in truth, real influence in political terms.
Just wondering if the mc guinness bashing has finished,you have all been dupped again by media controlled hype by the government joe duffy yesterday disgusted me as a so called ind radio presenter,pat kenny today the same .Martin mc guinness is the best person and you lot are only driving the likes of me ,and beleive me WE are the people to get him elected to do so,I was born in NI and have lived here as an Irish citizen for over 37 years and I am disgusted by the coments you have made of a man that ,if it were not for the likes of him we would still not have a voice in northern ireland,we would still be under the controll of extreem loyalists,we would still be supresed by the security services of the RUC,He did wrong,but he was doing a job he had to do to get us were we are today.Give him a chance,like the people of NI did ,the catholics not just sinn fein ,Gerry Adams has proved himself ,Why not him
The wording of McGuinness’s comment wasn’t exactly the most helpful but there’s no doubt that there is a strong anti-republican bias in our mainstream media.
This is also relfected in the sensationalist replies to this story and others.
Most unionists i have spoken to actually have quite a positive opinion of McGuinness and of what he has done both for community relations and for NI on the international stage. Of course he was involved in the Troubles – the most difficult period in recent Irish history – but that’s the past, the population of the north has moved on. If they didn’t there wouldn’t have been a peace process. If the world clung to the past, like some of the posters here, we would never progess. So come on folks, it’s not 1971, it’s 2011… let’s move on and look towards a better future.
Sure if we’ve all moved on and the past is the past then we should have Bertie and Brian back to run the economy again. And we can get the B-Specials back in Northern Ireland. No? Not a good plan?
Moving on means just that.
Electing Martin McGuinness as President of Ireland wouldn’t qualify as “moving on”. It would qualify as a significant step backways.
There is no doubt that there is a strong anti-republican bias in our mainstream media which reflects the anti-republican(SF/IRA version) in the country.
I am neither anti-republican, nor do I have any connection with mainstream media.
And yet, I am strongly opposed to the idea that plotting and murdering fellow Irish people for years before eventually and very belatedly realizing the moronic nature of those actions is much of a qualification for the Presidency.
@ Antóin O Cinnéde well said. The double-standards in venerating the IRA of 1916-21 and condemning the PIRA is inexplicable.
If anything, the PIRA campaign was probably more justified than the War of Independence, in that Westminster was far less sectarian than Stormont.
I often wonder why the sheeple here venerate the socialist James Connolly or Michael Collins yet are hysterical in their screaming denunciations of the Provos. If you read that Peter Hart book, what the IRA did in Cork in the War of Independence was far more indiscriminate and sectarian than anything the Provos ever did. Contrary to popular belief the Provos did not target civilians.
I think it is because they haven’t thought it through fully and it is simply a case that their media and politicians tell them to like this IRA over here but have 2 minutes of hate (yes, a deliberate nod to Orwell) for this IRA over there. It’s utterly farcical.
The opportunistic politicians here and our craven media are happy to fly the green flag when it is politically expedient to do so but only fly a flag at a distant, mythical past because if it is confined just to the eulogised past. it doesn’t require anything of those who do the faux-patriotic flag waving.
Did I hear you right the provos didn target civilians. What would you call the indiscriminate bombing campaign. The kidnaping of businessmen to be held for ransom. All the people referee to as ‘the missing’.
” Contrary to popular belief the Provos did not target civilians” = La Mon Hotel, Gilford, Claudy, Oxford St Bus Stat. Belfast, Darkly, etc.. Please Will, do not try and rewrite history. I live in Northern Ireland and lived through and experienced the troubles/conflict, however, with all the injustices I experienced I never was persuaded ( my conscience) to kill or blow up anybody or anything. Furthermore, M McGuinness speaks with great pride and support of IRA men killed ‘in action’,ie. Easter commemoration’s, why should he not then answer the questions about his past involvement ? What has he to be scared off ? has he something to hide in his past? Moreover, on scrolling through the posts I’ve noticed anybody who questions M McG. on his past are classed as ‘West Brits’ or, by some of the comments written here, are ignorant of their history, Have people not got the right to find out the truth of his involvement ? What is so inherently wrong in seeking the ‘truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth’
Please give Martin the keys to the front door as i believe he has already won. It is great to see the media running scared not knowing which way to turn.Oh my how the tide is turning, this is the opportunity the Irish people have been waiting for,this is where we can make the change for the better and sbow the world that peace and forgiveness is possible
How many of you raised your voices in anger when convicted loyalist terrorists took their seats in the northern assembly?
Did you rally against David Trimbles rise to becoming first minister even though he referred to the republic as “that pathetic, sectarian, mono-ethnic, mono-cultural state to the south of us”?
How many of you applauded David Ervine when he decided to drop terrorism and follow a peaceful democratic path?
That’s not the point James, let me ask you this then, were you one of the ones who stood up and applauded Michael stone (a convicted terrorist and enemy of Ireland) when he made an appearance on the late late show?
The people on this state were only to ready to accept him regardless that his organisation (UDA) was responsible for the systematic murdering and ethnic cleansing of Irish people in the north yet he was given a platform here with little or no animosity.
David Ervine was accepted as some sort of moderate loyalist and was invited to make speeches in trinity college completely ignoring that his organisation (UVF) were the scum who carried out the Dublin and Monaghan bombings , it’s not about them running for office it’s how readily we Irish condemn our own yet are willing to turn a blind eye to the deeds of the past actual enemies of this country were party to.
When the Queen visited anyone with a voice of discontent regarding her visit was told to “move on, leave the past in the past, look to the future”, etc etc yet i suspect the same people who told people to move on are the very same ones who are calling M.M’G out over his past.
@Dermot Mc Loughlin: It is of course the point, I applaud Martin McGuinness for what he’s done in NI in the past few years and am willing to “move on, leave the past in the past, and look to the furture” in that context. Do I want him or do I think he’s suitable to be Uachtarán na hÉireann? No. — Similarly, if Stone, Ervine or the Queen (of the Commonwealth realms) tried to become Uachtarán na hÉireann I would be against that too for similar reasons.
My reply to you was to show the shameful hypocrisy and double standards inherent in Irish society – willing to forgive and forget on one hand then despise on the other in accordance with their own pompous deluded ideals and it’s why we’re constantly asked to vote for unsuitable clowns in every general election,
Michael Noonan was voted back in (and indeed FG) by people who conveniently forgot him and his party’s shambolic stint as health minister (94-97) and his demonisation of Bridget McCole and her family during the hepatitis C scandal.
Maybe be going off topic a bit here but it displays the readiness of the Irish electorate to pick holes in one candidate and let one slide through.
I think that Martin Mc Guinness coment on west brits is some what premature, I am over 70 years and I remember very well the turmoil that he and his party represented and the bombing, assasinations, the killings of innocent civilians, the list is endless,are we supposed to forget all the past because he put down his arms and stopped using the Gun and bomb,I dont think so Martin leopards dont change their spots, would the Shankill butchers be also eligable and Big Ian.if he is the best that we have along with David norris to represent this Country God help us havent we enough fucks running it and in our goverement ,thats why we are in the state we are in now.
Just shows how bizarre this all is…..to insult someone as decent as Brian Inglis & many of the other great journalists who taught me well by using the term West Brit! (wry sigh) Oh do please stay in the North Martin where you’re doing awfully well … really don’t think you are wanted down here so do spare us all the embarrassment.
Martin is an Irish Citizen , who now has helped and attained Civil Rights for himself and all persons , on this whole Island called Ireland – there is no up there or down here !
It’s not so long ago , when not every Citizen on this Island did have a vote ,or equal rights for that matter.
I have a grand broad Kerry accent Jeananne and have never had a problem with my fellow citizens in Dublin calling me a culchie or a bogger
In fact I have enjoyed the distinction of being one over the years, having been reared and schooled in Dublin when my parents moved there when I was aged seven.
Methinks that some people " need to wise up and get a life " as would be said by my wife of 37 years – a proud Irishwoman , born , raised and educated in President Mary McAleese’s, West Belfast ! A Belfast or Ulster expression, as the song says one the "four proud provinces of Ireland" in that most popular Uniting Irish song – Ireland’s Call, which we all sing with our United Rugby Union Team.
Do you suggest that the Ulster Team and Players should stay "up there" too Jeananne ?
I don’t !
West brit to me is not offensive ? My Grandfather took a bullet in the head for englands interests ? He survived he would slag off any of most of you lot as being mutton dressed up as lamb ?? Myself I might say a lot of you do not know your arse from your elbow ??
@Cormac. My map doesn’t show any element of another country ? Just the one, divided undemocratically and against the will of the majority on this island. I’d be quite happy to put that to an all-Ireland plebiscite. You are more than welcome to vote as you please.
Are you really saying that the ecclesiastical capital of Ireland is in a foreign country ?
You must have missed the vote on the good Friday agreement. And the republics vote to get rid of articles 2 and 3. The majority have moved on – why should there be a united Ireland – to save ink on maps?
The religious capital of Ireland is the Vatican, but you must have missed that empire while it was here – maybe time could be better spent other than looking at maps.
This country is inextricably linked to Britain both economically and culturally. A quick bit of research in most Irish people’s ancestry will either find family members all to glad to settle there or some sort if British connection. In 1916 there were 260000 Irish in the employ if the crown against about a total of 70000 Irish Volunteers of which only 12000 approx wanted a separate state. The vast majority of working class Irish had family fighting in the Somme. The middle classes didn’t want revolution. The threat of conscription and the continued opposition of Irish unionists drove the electorate to vote Sinn Fein. Only for that Ireland would be still a part of the UK with a Dublin parliament. So this notion that there ordinary people ever supported terrorism then and not now is a fallacy. As a matter of fact the IRA and Free State performed butchery with panache in the civil war. The IRA assassinated Cosgraves elderly uncle in his garden and Seamus Mallon TD outside his house. The free state hanged 75 IRA , more than the Brits ever did. In the end we ended up with a peverse Catholic state that polarised the nation and fucked up any chance of a united Irish republic. This is and has always been a banana republic without the benefit of sun tanned comely maidens.
And even Mr. Wilson found it in his heart to forgive those responsible and make pleas for them to move away from violence, which they have now done. It’s ironic that people throw up the names of good people who; would be delighted to see SF as a now peaceful party, and use their poignant stories as a political football to ensure that progress is stifled.
The Eniskillen bombing was in 1987. The didn’t “move away from violence” for years afterwards, and Mr Wilson forgave them, but asked them to stop killing people. They didn’t stop.
Finally, wanting to have people like McG and Paisley out of Irish politics isn’t a desire to stifle progress, it’s a desire to accelerate it.
Gordon Wilson never said he forgave the IRA for what they did. He said he “bore them no ill-will.”
However, he did meet leading members of the IRA in secret but never felt he recieved a satisfactory answer as to why they murdered his daughter and the other victims at Enniskillen.
@hughsheehy – They have moved away from violence since, which was my point. Do you reckon that Mr. Wilson would be pleased to see you or anybody else use the death of his daughter as a lever to keep SF from being a democratic force today rather than an armed one?
__
@Adrian Martyn – It is widely acknowledged that he did forgive.. http://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/28/obituaries/gordon-wilson-67-campaigner-for-peace-in-northern-ireland.html .. You can take whatever meaning you want from his words but for most they are seen as forgiving yet unhappy words. He never did receive a satisfactory answer, you’re right there. But since his death, answers and apologies have been given, and although you may not see that as enough, I am sure that Mr. Wilson would have at least viewed it as a step in the right direction.. a small step that has led us to where we are today.
Are you suggesting that merely invoking the memory of innocent Irish people murdered by the IRA might – by damaging Sinn Fein’s electoral prospects – cause them to take up arms?
I’m pretty sure Mr Wilson would not be pleased by that prospect. Neither am I, but it won’t make me more likely to vote for an indignant ex-terrorist.
What about all the civilians targeted by Britain in the bombings of Berlin and Dresden in world war 2.
What about the 13 unarmed civilians shot on the streets of Derry in the name of queen Elizabeth the second.
What about the Argentinian ship blown up while leaving the combat zone in the falklands war carried out in the name of queen Elizabeth.
What about the torturing and forced confessions and miscarriages of justice carried out against innocent civilians carried out by British intelligence during the troubles.
What about the collusion between ruc and loyalists during the troubles.
Did past British atrocities stop people welcoming the queen to this country?
Did the past of Martin mcguinness stop Ian paisley have a working relation ship with him?
Are some of you guys less tolerant than Ian Paisley?
You have to admit, Paisley was right about the Catholic Church. Spot on. Seems wee Marty is getting tetchy already… Not a good start for an aspiring man of all the people. Next week Marty has a go at cute Cork hoors for demanding partition in the south.
Are we being asked to vote for the Queen as our head of State?
No? So what’s Britain got to do with this debate?
The links to Dev and co from 1916 is also irrelevant. they are all long dead.
We are being asked to vote for a man that is alive and well, and was responsible for hundreds, if not thousands of deaths on this Island.
We’re not debating the Queens guilt, The guilt of the members of the rising or anyone else, because they are not standing for election as head of our state today.
He asks us to vote for him and to consider his role as a peacmaker, yet anyone that mentions that he was instrumental in the violance that occured before that peace is a West Brit.
John Hume is the man resposible for peace in NI.
Who’s to say that he wouldn’t have gained exactly what is now present in NI, years before hand, by peaceful means.
But he was never given that chance. The IRA and Martin McGuinness chose the path of violance instead of the path of peaceful protest.
now he wants us to forget all about that and give him credit for giving up arms and taking a peaceful path?
If he wants to be taken seriously, he must expect to have all of his history examined, not just the whitewashed version that any journalist that isn’t a West Brit will paint.
@ Donncha.
Ian Paisley was only banging on about the RC church because of his deep burning hatred of Catholicism and not becasue he had any moral crusade
Attention thumbs down brigade, kindly type down why you disagree like any normal person would and not content yourselves with anonymity, it’s good for a debate not to have weaklings hiding in the wings to pour anonymous scorn on stuff they disagree with.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed — and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment — the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution — not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants” — but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion. – John F. Kennedy -
This man appears completely ignorant of the history, the trajectory, the path, by which a free Society maintains that very Freedom. The Press is often sighted in various polls as being viewed with greater disdain than Politicians by the population at large. But if the Liberal Progressive trajectory of Western Societies has taught us anything at all, since the dawn of the Enlightenment, then it is that we ought to be very suspicious of attempts at censorship or gagging, whether legal or otherwise. A free Press is not without failings, not without due oversight, not without limitations. But when a Nation becomes susceptible to the very notion that their Press is somewhat ‘other’, alien in nature, alien in interest, then the infringement of Freedom and Liberty is but a hairs breath away.
This Mr Guinness is the standards by which a free society exists, I hope you can embrace it. And if not, then that you be broken by it. Thomas Jefferson considered Freedom of the Press as paramount, more valuable than Democracy, than Religious Freedom, than the Separation of Powers. For they cannot be guaranteed without Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience, Freedom of Assembly. Criticism is a vital and necessary attribute of Freedom, without it we are no more than sheep to be shepherded.
Hi Desmond, I haven’t deleted any on this story – if you’re reading through the mobile site or an app, you might find that the story doesn’t load the entire cache of comments simply due to size/download constraints.
O how Britain must be looking at us now and think the Irish there at it again fighting with them self’s it was so easy to keep them in Bon’dage for 800 years there was a lot of people who call them self Irish and have never put there life on the line for Irish Indebt’edness as is with a lot of politi’eian in pow’er to day Iknow of one how is Runing for President that is Martin McGuinness lets all get to geather as one nation and stop the sqablin for once and for all time and we as a people can be free.
Sums up alot when the place name ‘Antrim’ gets 19 thumbs down.
Guys I’m sorry but the queen is gone and she isn’t coming back ,Some may not like that but get over it
It’s not my fault that the state is near bankrupt. Where was your media to warn you about that ?
The next round of cuts will open a few more eyes.
A new Republic gives an opportunity to start again and create a society that works for it’s people and not the chosen few.
@Clare. Anytime. I’m always up for engaging and not the hit and run posting you present as discourse.
The queen’s on your money Paul, not mine. I’d be interested in your response to the 19th amendment vote I mentioned above – you seem to have missed it in your haste to leave a comment where nobody would see it! (Talk about engaging!)
A paraphrased ‘Anchorman’ quote. McGuinness is bound to be reconsidering his position right about now. Well done. You aren’t considering running for President aswell, are you?
McGuinness has a great chance of winning, for it was a great political masterstroke for Sinn Fein. He’ll gobble up all the young vote, which could see him making his way up to the big house in the park. Young people don’t listen to the pontificating that is constantly being spouted about people like McGuinness’ . And people do have to admit that he is a very good politician. The irony of it all: he could be the Commander in Chief of the Irish forces! Little did he know, when he was running round the streets of Derry as a young-fella, he was to be in for a chance to be the president of Ireland! Truth is stranger than fiction! I hope he wins.
Martin – As was explained above, no comments have been deleted (if they were, they wouldn’t be included in the total). I’m guessing you’re on iPhone or iPad, in which case the app has a bug which stops it showing all comments once they pass the 100 threshold.
Trinity warns staff not to answer US government request for diversity and equality information
15 hrs ago
50.1k
140
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say