Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
NEW LAWS THAT that will ensure gift vouchers are valid for at least five years after they are sold are to kick in on Monday.
The new law will place a ban on contract terms that require gift vouchers to be spent in one transaction. It will also be prohibited to place a limit on the number of vouchers a shopper can use in one transaction.
In addition, there will also be a ban on the cancellation of gift vouchers, or the imposition of charges by airlines, where the name of the gift voucher recipient differs from the name on the passport.
The Consumer Protection (Gift Vouchers) Bill 2018, proposed by Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation, Heather Humphreys, aims to address the lack of regulation in the gift voucher market.
Currently, there is no minimum expiry date on gift vouchers under law, with some retailers issuing expiry dates on their vouchers after a short period of time.
Lack of regulations
The lack of regulation in the gift voucher market has caused confusion among consumers, said the minister, many of whom were losing out because of unknown expiry dates.
The new rules come into operation on Monday 2 December – also known as Cyber Monday – a popular time for shoppers to snap up deals before Christmas after today’s Black Friday.
In relation to the provision which sets out that a consumer no longer has to use the voucher in one transaction, the retailer will now be required to reimburse any remaining balance of more than one euro by way of cash, electronic transfer or another voucher, where the voucher cannot be used more than once.
“I am very pleased to be able to bring the five-year expiry date and a number of other important protections for consumers into effect from Monday,” the minister said. ” I am particularly pleased to do so at the start of the Christmas period when many of us will buy or receive gift vouchers.”
“Consumers should not find themselves unable to use gift vouchers given to them by family members or friends because of unreasonably short expiry periods imposed by gift voucher issuers. Many gift vouchers until now have had expiry periods of just one or two years and in some cases it has been as little as six months. As of Monday anyone who receives a gift voucher will have the certainty that it will be valid for at least five years,” she said.
Humphreys said short expiry periods are not the only way in which consumers have been
treated unfairly by certain gift voucher providers.
“Some businesses have required consumers to spend a voucher in full in a single transaction. This meant if you have a restaurant voucher for €100 and your meal came to €80, you were prevented from getting change or a voucher with the balance of €20,” she said.
The minister said it is not uncommon for people to get more than one gift voucher, particularly at Christmas time.
“So for example if a person wanted to use two €50 vouchers together to buy a product for €100, they were prevented from doing so,” the minister said, adding that this has now been changed.
“It is estimated that every year consumers in Ireland lose millions in un-redeemed or expired vouchers. These measures will protect consumers and will help to ensure the value of the voucher you buy for your loved one this Christmas ends up in their pocket and not somebody else’s,” said Humphreys.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
“privatisation Drive” , another ” lets grab all they have” scam. Like ourselves, soon to be left with nothing to call our own.
@RJ.Fallon: beating up a 75 year old man should sort that right out…
@RJ.Fallon: we have nothing to call our own its all been given away by our treasous politicians….this republic has been sold right under our feet and stupid paddy doesnt give a f@@k.
@BananaRepublic1922:
Good.
I rather see them sold than the Irish taxpayer being on the hook for them
I worked in the semi state sector for years, my god the people in them would get some fright if there jobs were actually at risk.
@RJ.Fallon: Millionaire FF/FG politicians are just waiting for an excuse to sell IW from under our noses.
It isn’t the Greeks it’s the Chinese he’s after.
We can all sympathise with how they may feel, seeing their country being sold out from under them, but beating the ever loving sh.. it out of a 75 year old man isn’t the way to solve anything. That’s the sort of thing that makes their cause worthless, it makes them worse than those they’re angry about. A big muscled lad picking on the weakest in society, yeah that sends a great message.
With a meeting of eurozone finance ministers set for 21 June, teams of experts from the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have met with the Greek government in recent days to discuss its privatisation drive, an overhaul of the civil service and the deregulation of the state-dominated energy market.
In a statement that gave no detail on the agreement, the EU’s executive said a staff-level accord had been reached.
This is the main piece of the article that deserves attention. The people they carried out the attack were labelled as being far right wing by the office of the countries left-wing leader. A cynical person would question this.
Perhaps the attackers were people that voted for Tsipras and Syriza in 2015 and now are utterly dismayed at how their country is and sold out from under their feet.
In any event I don’t know I wasn’t there.
The sad thing is there is no end in sight, Greece cannot effectively survive in the euro it is the totally wrong currency for them.
@John Fergus: don’t get me wrong it’s tragic what happened. Those responsible for beating a 75-year-old man should be figuratively hung. That being said the official line on this is likely skewed to benefit those giving it.
@John Fergus: Currency? If your economy was a basket case to begin with, does it matter much about the currency? Interestingly, most Greeks want to stay in the Euro, apparently – go figure?
Disgusting hitting a 75 year old man.
Unforgivable.
Would it have been OK If he was 30 and not 75?
have your say