Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AP/Press Association Images
Ukraine
Grief-stricken Odessa "reeling" after 42 die in clashes
Ukraine’s Prime Minister is visiting the port city today.
11.03am, 4 May 2014
9.9k
136
UKRAINE’S PRIME MINISTER visits the grief-stricken Black Sea port city of Odessa today, two days after 42 died in clashes between pro-Russian militants and supporters of the Kiev authorities.
Arseniy Yatsenyuk’s trip was to “meet social, political, cultural and economic leaders from the Odessa region,” his office said in a statement.
He was expected to hold a news conference later.
The scenic southern city of more than one million people is still reeling from Friday’s horrific scenes where 38 people perished in an inferno in the centre of town after running battles.
The blaze began as pro-Moscow and pro-Kiev demonstrators traded petrol bombs after four people were killed in clashes between the opposing groups.
Earlier Sunday, Yatsenyuk vowed a “full, comprehensive and independent investigation” into the tragedy, as authorities declared two days of mourning.
Advertisement
Laying the blame
The prime minister laid the blame for the deaths at the security forces.
“These security forces are inefficient and they violated the law,” he told the BBC.
The prosecutor’s office is to investigate everyone — starting with the chief of police, his deputies and every single police officer.
However, he blamed pro-Russian demonstrators for “provoking” the violence.
Authorities have previously admitted the security forces were “helpless” to prevent pro-Russian militants seizing a string of towns in the east.
More than a dozen towns have fallen under rebel control and the Western-backed government in Kiev has launched what it calls an “anti-terrorism” operation to retake them.
They might. Its just now they want chaos as elections are soon. After those elections government will feel it has a mandate to act and they will. Russia will have less reason to invade as whole world will destroy them economically.
Little Things called the UN the IMF and the biggest economy’s in world. Maybe not whole world if you want to be technical but the parts of the world with most economic clout. So as good as.
The UN?Lol.It;s a talking shop,little more.
‘ the biggest economy’s in world’
You mean China?They just overtook the USA as the world’s biggest economy.Yeah they just happen to be a strong ally of Russia.
So P O Neill you think the killing of dozens of unarmed civilians by a fascist mob is a signal that Russia is showing aggression? That’s the imperialist world of the US and UK your living in and supporting. But only the Ukrainians will suffer if there is a civil war. Time for both US/UK and Russia to fix this problem and both stop using it for their own geo political self interests.
I can’t remember it but when exactly did Sinn Fein become mainstream garbage, as bad as Fianna Fraud, Liebour and the Blueshirt Ba$tards now, guess thats why the nickname Shame Fail was coined.
Nicole, P O’Neill was against SF and the peace process. The account here with P O’Neill and the SF logo is a paradox. There is no way you can associate SF to this commenters profile or attitude. I say that clearly as someone who converted to supporting SF 4 years ago.
Little Things called the UN the IMF ”
– UN is a talk shop – it showed its teeth when it came to Iraq -
– and IMF is one of Russias best allies – it destroys countries – and will destroy the Ukraine – not that US cars – that’s what IMF is there for – to destroy countries – and put US political agenda in place .
And as has been said China is now set this year to be world s biggest economy – and comparing the indebtedness of Russia and China v US and EU – its a no contest . In an economic war – there can only be one winner – the countries with resources – eg Russia and China .
But US wants a civil war in Ukraine – and looks like they may get it .
re Chinas economy http://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/china-poised-to-pass-us-as-world-s-leading-economic-power-1.1778656
So yankeeland will soon be No.2 .
what world do you live in??”
– question is what world do u live in . US and EU bust – and China this year will be world biggest economy – and don’t forget S America – and Russia and Africa .
Infidel – I wouldn’t be so sure about China and Russia being close allies. They’ve both threatened each other with military force in recent months and the situation at present could best be described as an uneasy stand-off.
Avina, Russia and China have threatened each other with military action, really? Links please?
In reality, relations between Russia and China have never been stronger, especially since Xi Jinping became president. He reportedly has a close working relationship with Putin. His inaugural foreign trip was to Russia, and he was there again recently for the Sochi games opening ceremony.
Rather than ‘threatening’ each other, there’s been unprecedented military co-operation, including taking part in the largest joint military and naval drills in the history of the People’s Liberation Army. Later this month, for example, the two nations are planning to carry out joint naval drills in the East China Sea.
There’s also reports that the two nations are currently negotiating their largest ever defence agreement. Russia is apparently about to begin selling China submarines, fighter jets, and air and missile defence systems, all of which would strengthen China’s military position greatly.
And that’s without mentioning their energy ties. Only last year, a 25-year deal was reached to double Russia’s natural gas exports to China. There are also rumours that, after a decade of talks, a deal is close to being reached over a massive 30-year gas deal, which would involve the construction of a pipeline between the countries.
Historically, Sino-Russian relations have never been better.
Avina china will become what Saudi Arabia became to the US. China are a huge energy hungry country and in order for them to move on up they need energy, lots of it. Thats where Russia comes in, and unlike the US or EU it understands communism and the Chinese system. Long story short, Russia and China are about to become lovers.
China isn’t supporting Russia’s actions in the Ukraine though. When the Security Council voted to condemn the Crimean referendum, only Russia voted against. China abstained. China and Russia are normally allies but even China isn’t backing Russian foreign policy in Ukraine.
China’s reasons for abstaining likely had little to do with the actual situation in Crimea, and everything to do with not promoting separatist movements within it’s own borders. It’s classic pragmatic China, especially considering that security council votes are almost entirely symbolic and achieve little.
Its also a lot to do with China’s ideology in foreign policy. China is highly noninterventionist. Its very consistent on this, refusing to support American ‘nation building’ or recognize the independence of Abkhazia or South Ossetia.
Its a similar situation to the Us and France.
China is normally a Russian ally on the Security Council but even China gets exasperated on Russian foreign policy.
Yes, and China’s non-interventionist policy is rooted in a desire to protect it’s territorial integrity and to prevent the numerous separatist movements within it’s borders from gaining traction.
None of that takes away from the fact that China is a strong economic and military ally of Russia.
The idea that the ‘entire world’ is going to isolate Russia is farcical. Most of Asia and Latin America is a stronger ally of Russia than the US or Europe. Of course, to many in the US and Europe, the US and Europe is the entire world, so I can see how they might think that.
Fair enough, I was mistaken about specific threats in recent months, but the point stands that the Sino-Russian relationship can be seen as a marriage of convenience with China increasingly holding the balance of power in that relationship. China still maintains a territorial claim over Russia’s Far East, and has never been afraid of displays of force designed to show Moscow that their relationship is one based on selfish practicalities alone rather than on any particular allegience to Russia. Its unwillingness to give Russia unwavering backing and instead remaining neutral on many conflicts involving Russia is also an indication of the coolness of their relationship.
“To military observers, the Beijing/Shenyang exercises seemed to be practice for a possible offensive operation against Russia, because exercises on such a scale are undertaken only at the final stage of a multi-year programme to train troops to enact specific strategic and operational plans. The geography of the exercises, and the offensive nature of the tasks undertaken, leaves little doubt that Russia was cast in the role of “potential adversary”. Such a show of force is an ancient, traditional Chinese political technique”. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-s-threat-to-russia
Its normally a Russian ally due to a shared opposition to US hegemony but this is conditional. Russia is very isolated in its actions in Ukraine. Alone in the Security Council and with little support in the General Assembly.
They’re allies but Russia is on its own in Ukraine.
Avina, did you really just post a link from 2007 to bolster your argument? Strangely enough, a lot had changed since then.
Russia and China have, in recent years, been engaging in unprecedented military co-operation. Only last year, the People’s Liberation Army took part in the largest joint military drill in it’s history- with Russia, of the coast of Vladivostok. This month, the two nations will be carrying out joint naval drills in the East China Sea.
Avina, did you really just post a link from 2007 to bolster your argument? Strangely enough, a lot has changed since then.
In recent years, Russia and China have been engaging in unprecedented military cooperation. Only last year, the People’s Liberation Army took part on the largest series of joint military drills in it’s history- with Russia, off the cosy of Vladivostok. Later this month, the two nations will take part in joint naval drills in the East China Sea.
If China was really a threat, do you think Russia would be agreeing to sell them their most advanced defence systems?
Or attempt to sign a massive energy agreement with them? Expect the has deal to be announced when Putin visits China later this month.
Opinion pieces from 2007 notwithstanding, Sino-Russian relations have never been stronger.
I had included three links in that comment, but every time I tried to post it with the links attached, the comment disappeared. Strange, to say the least.
Whitefang, seven years is a blink of an eye in geopolitical terms. I have already acknowledged that I was incorrect in the detail (I originally read it in a comment on here which I now accept was wrong).
The substantive point remains however – China is a very practical state and will do whatever is good for China regardless of what that means for Russia. Russia cannot rely on the blanket support of China unless it is also in China’s interests. They are more like uncomfortable bedfellows than close allies.
Seven years is a blink of an eye in geological terms. In geopolitical terms, it’s seven years. And seven years is a long time.
Seven years ago the US had GWB in office and was increasing the number of troops in Iraq, Russia was dealing with an energy dispute in Belarus and an insurgency in Chechnya, China was experiencing the largest series of protests since Tiananmen Square in ’89, Ukraine held early parliamentary elections and Yanukovych’s Party of Regions came out on top, and protests were growing in Georgia.
Since then, almost everything has changed. Sino-Russian relations in 2007 are almost unrecognisable compared to the same relations in 2014.
And of course it’s an alliance of practicality- essentially all political alliances are, especially in pragmatic China. That doesn’t take away from the strengthening ties between the two nations.
I agree with some of what you say Whitefang. The geopolitical situation on the ground can sometimes change very quickly – we need look no further than Crimea. The point I’m making though is that attitudes and mindsets take decades to change, as we know only too well in the North.
Sure, China will support Russia if it also benefits them, but Russia cannot and should not rely on unwavering Chinese support whatever the issue – they won’t always get it.
Avina, nobody, especially not Russia, is claiming that Russia can rely on ‘unwavering’ support from China. Russia is fully aware that it’s an alliance of convenience and that China will only act as an ally for as long as it benefits them. That’s the purpose of these military drills and defence and energy agreements- to strengthen the alliance by benefitting both sides.
Russia has far more to offer China than the US or Europe, especially considering the strong ties between the US and Japan, China’s greatest enemy.
The analogy made by a previous poster comparing Russia and China’s relationship to that of the US and Saudi Arabia is a good one. Whatever their differences, both sides in that alliance gain a great deal. The same can be said of Russia and China.
Perhaps I haven’t been making it very well, but my point is that China has always done what’s good for China regardless of who it affects and what the rest of the world thinks. That hasn’t changed and is unlikely to change in the near future.
China will support Russia on a particular issue if and only if Russia’s position carries some benefit for China too.
The jury is still out on whether Russia’s actions in Ukraine meet this criteria and have China’s approval, as evidenced by their recent decision to abstain rather than vote in support of Russia on the issue.
Relevant to what you state above, a large political and business delegation visited the German capital recently, the “Silk road project “being their main topic of discussion. The Gas pipelines from Russia should be operative in about 6 months to one year. Both countries China and Russia are very anxious to include Germany in this “Silk road project” Watching a lot of German TV, reading German newspapers and speaking with a lot of business people the last few weeks it is very obvious that the great majority are against sanctions, despite some lip service by some politicians under enormous pressure from the US. They do not want to have any problems with their third largest trading partner , and definitely do not want to import (Ship) very expensive shale gas from the USA. All around they are hopeful that everybody can sit together in the very near future, all four parties, to solve this enormous problem caused by the illegal coup. China is of course the laughing third party here at the moment . Angela Merkel visited Washington on Friday to discuss the current problem in Ukraine among other problems She is under enormous pressure from German business leaders , Siemans, VW. Mercedes, EON etc not to allow German industrial interests be sacrificed to USA Geopolitical and Wall street interests.Read in “Der Spiegel” tomorow
Question for Ukrainians who want to be annexed by Russia: if Russia is so great, why are there thousands of them trying to get into our little bankrupt country every week?
Question for Russian ministry of education, do you really award degrees in thuggery, extortion, pimping, drug dealing and gangsterism? If so it would seem that the crème de la crème of your alumni have arrived here in Ireland.
Question For Alan Shatter, at what point will the need to protect Irish citizens from the violence and intimidation of Eastern European organised criminals, be a sufficiently pressing issue for you to tackle Ireland’s immigration crisis?
Let’s hope sense on all sides prevail and a political solution is found to the crisis. Regardless of the views of people this has all the potential to become a civil war. The only people to suffer will be the Ukrainians.
40 unarmed protestors burned alive in a building. The videos all show exactly what happened. It’s a pretty sad day for the west which allies itself with an openly fascist illegally installed so called government in the middle of Europe. And people who protest against this are burned alive.
According to non-western news Press TV, American troops are steadily arriving in Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. Further proof that the unrest up until now has been orchestrated by the US, in a bid to slowly surround Russia. The old “divide and conquer” trick working a treat it seems.
Indeed yet we are lead to believe Russia is the agressor. And Russians being burned alive in Odessa? Do people really believe Poland and Estonia are going to be attacked? It’s all upside down here.
Russia is the aggressor the invasion of crimea remember. Up to that point the whole situation was political but russia put boots on the ground and annexed the crimea
Sure Rian. Those murdered by Pravy Sektor on the maidan, it was political. The people of Crimea seceded from Kiev after their president was ousted in a coup, that’s why it’s all Putins fault lol
@rian The ascension of Crimea into Russia was not an invasion! It is made up of 97% Russians and they VOTED to join Russia.
Please stop believing everything you hear on RTE news.
Rian they didn’t invade. They already had troops there are per agreement. And the local defence forces rose up. And finally 75% of the Ukrainian military including their naval commander, defected to the Russian side. It was no invasion.
Yes but the treaty didnt say they could besiege and storm Ukrainian military bases did it. I mean the Crimea didn’t float off and become a seperate nation
This country is on the verge of civil war. The ultras are being allowed to get away with this. What kind of people shoot men and women trying to escape a burning building and beat the ones who manage to survive jumping from the higher floors. It makes me sick to see people like this. I wish the Russia army could go in and sort this shit out but I don’t known if its such a good idea, I’m mean, how would our brave land of the free “bullshit” allies react.
They would react quiet rightly and see it as putin enslaving a population as he has with Belarus.
Funny pro Russian sentiment around here forget conveniently about first port of call in civil unrest and thats UN peacekeepers. Plus Russia is stoking up tensions and there will sadly be incidents where thise criminally included will do bad things when they see their country invaded which it has been by military advisors and weapons from Russia.
Some dont understand so I always make a comparison. Love ulster march attacked. Riots in dublin. Was that done by nationalist irish? Hell no just every uneducated toerag out from mountjoy with no celtic match to watch. Same thing will happen their.
So no if they want security let them or even let Russia go to un and ask for peace keeping force.
Agree with ya UN peacekeeping force the only way now, but it ain’t just Russia stoking up tension, that’s coming from all sides, Yatsenyuk is a goon, 4 years ago he called Tymoschenko an evil woman and now he’s backing her for Presidency, it seems to me he is just a mouthpiece for people that should have no influence in Ukraine at all.
Give it a rest with facile Ireland Ukraine comparisons they don’t translate.
‘ Plus Russia is stoking up tensions and there will sadly be incidents where thise criminally included will do bad things when they see their country invaded which it has been by military advisors and weapons from Russia. ‘
Funny you say that, notorious anti-Putin Guardian journalist Luke harding whose on the ground in Donetsk seems to think most of the separatists are locals.Listen you told us yesterday you went on a back packing holiday in Western Ukraine,I’m sure you had some nice chats with local people there about the ‘SS butcher Bandera who is a hero in those parts,but it does not make you a political expert on Ukraine,and you seem all too willing to forgive the excesses of right wing nationalist thugs to justify your own viewpoint.
Yea cause every other country the US has gone into help has ended soo well.
All sides here are to blame, but Russia, seeing an organisation like NATO setting up shop on their door step have a right to take a proactive approach in my opinion.
Those people were told to leave that government building, they didn’t and this is what happens, its sick. I don’t care what side you are on this should not happen.
The US started this whole thing, everyone who doesn’t rely on their news from FOX, CNN and other western news outlets(if you can even call them that) knows this. And that’s probably why you are seeing pro Russian support or talk here, people understand what is going on and not just believing what they are told.
The US is now making a habit of backing the wrong horse.First the head-chopping cannibal zombies in Syria,now Nationalist far-right thugs in Ukraine.All to advance the cause of democracy of course.
European Infidel…..The Reason that the US is now making a habit of backing the wrong horse is because it is controlled by an evil Government that has strayed away from serving the interests of its own people. ….Just like what happened in Germany in the 1930′s and 40′s
Riddle, I have not read any polls. Tell that to Nicole who’s brainwashed herself into thinking that the US is one way or the other.
She, you and others need to get some perspective on what the thinking is over here about Ukraine. Obviously the Obama administration is showing support for Ukraine but it’s a stretch to say that they want to see violence.
Declan I appreciate your perspective. However, before being so sure about what Obama and his gov, consider the neocon objectives if “full spectrum” US dominance. And that Russia cannot ever be allowed to act as a “constraint” on US hegemony. That’s not my opinion that’s the Wolfowitz doctrine. Obama came to power promising “hope and change” but things are getting worse. And we see neocons like Nuland plotting a coup. And we see “US democracy” coming this time to Europe in the form of fascist mob rule. It’s not just my opinion check out former assistant treasury secretary Paul Craig Roberts article below. I know American people don’t want violence but their government absolutely does. Again, it’s not just my opinion even Henry Kissenger and Pat Buchanan are against this and say demonising Russia is madness and not a policy. Do take at look at PCR “father of Reaganomics” article here. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/05/02/washington-intends-russias-demise-paul-craig-roberts/
Riddle, so you acknowledge that there is a difference of opinion over here about Ukraine. Again, please let Nicole know. She paints everything in black and white.
Now, I’m going to enjoy my Sunday off.
Reports that their own petrol bombs killed them but id not believe that just yet. There was a hated pitch battle. So full investigation needed.
But if we had alot of british here demonstrating in dublin that they wanted Britain to invade and started causing trouble well thet would find that trouble. Then one idiot from eirgi would seriously hurr one and someone in Ukraine would say look at those irish all fascists. Those hard right there represent 5 percent but gather a few idiots anywhere and confront them and this is what you get.
James, 75% of Dublin does not consider itself British (even though FG wishes it so). Big difference.
There are videos of the pro-kiev militia attacking and beating victims with metal bar those who jumped out of 2nd and 3rd floor windows that didn’t die from the fall, all while the Police stood by and watched.
If i was Pro-Russian and living there, I know how i would be feeling today.
Pat, that video speaks a thousand truths that you will not see on any western news channel. It defies the lies and propaganda that is being spewed out by anti-Russian media stations. P O’Neill, do the anti-Kiev protesters in that video look like a group who deserve to be burn’t alive?
I know Cal, all the western propagandists are saying they don’t know who started the fire or who were responsible. It’s comical at this stage, their denials remind me of Comical Ali in Iraq. Between the video Joe and I put up you very clearly see who attacked who, who set the building on fire, and how the people were trapped inside the building with those on the outside shooting at them as they escaped.
I know the protestors on the other side are no angels and caused deaths themselves but enough of this bullsh*t if the bad pro Russian protestors and good pro Maidan protestors. They both have plenty of lunatics in their ranks. How are Irish people so gullible to not see what it going at!
Sickening how some people like James and others on these threads can justify these deaths to suit their personal narrative.Just admit it Yat’s let his Fascist mad dogs Right Sector off the leash.38 people got roasted alive as a result and people like him and others on here are still trying to make facile Ireland Ukraine comparisons.
Don’t be so ridiculous, the whole thing needs deescalation not an invasion, many more innocent lives will be destroyed, they need to round up the cowboys on both sides and lock them all up for life.
Pat oh yes I agree hence why I said id not believe off hand any reports as im well aware how bad the smaller nationalist element can be and that should be investigated. There was petrol bombs on both sides and anyone who is identified should be jailed. Simples.
Oddessa was known for a while to have a large Russian leaning population so its a good place to go for a fight if your a toerag nationalist. That movement is small infact dwarfed by maiden movement. But in the chaos tgey are going to do what criminals do best. Commit crimes.
It’s pointless talking to James. His views will not change even if he looks at the video. He spreading the propaganda that the ethnic Russians and the trade union staff started the fire from inside. How could they have had time after they were chased to buy petrol and bottles. I’m not reading James comments anymore because his support for the pro US government is absolute and truth means nothing to him.
Joe thanks for the link. Really shows who the murderers were on Feb 20 and who were simply doing their job. I still find it difficult to believe how Western Europe can be supporting the current authorities in Ukraine who don’t have power legitimately. And my heart goes out to those innocent protestors who were burned alive yesterday.
Pat – tell me what you see from 2.00 in your video. At least one fire was started INSIDE the building. Before you or anyone else jump down my throat I’m not denying that petrol bombs were thrown from outside the building or trying to justify that in any way. Just pointing out the facts.
Also, I haven’t seen any ‘western media propaganda’ outlets trying to either justify or deny what happened. Even Kiev said the fire was started criminally and have vowed to track down those involved (starting with yesterday’s arrest of 130 people). What outlets are you referring to?
Re. your link Joe, if those shots were being fire at unarmed people trying to escape the fire then that is truly reprehensible. The individual involved is easily identifiable and should be prosecuted accordingly.
We know from eyewitness reports that shots were also being fired FROM the building though – how do you know that he wasn’t just trading shots with those firing at the people below?
Your justifying it Avima is the problem. If it were the other way around you would be calling for Russia to be invaded by NATO. Pure shite from the king of spin
Well judging by the fact he is just standing there firing off shots and not bothering to get cover I’d say he doesn’t see himself in any immediate danger, no point in making presumptions, it is what it is, a man firing a gun at a burning building that people are trying to escape from.
I watched reports from several channels and none of them claimed the trapped people had firearms.
Nicole – I’m not justifying it in any way. I was at pains to point that out in my comments if you read them properly. And neither would I call for NATO to invade Russia, but don’t let that get in the way of your nonsense.
Perhaps you’ve been watching the wrong channels Joe:
“Medics at the scene said the pro-Russia fighters were also shooting from the roof. At least five bodies with bullet wounds lay on the ground covered by Ukraine flags as fire engines and ambulances arrived at the scene.”
He’s clearly not in an exchange of gunfire, he would be seeking cover if he was and he’s not firing at the roof where the alleged gunman were, from the angle he’s aiming at 1st or 2nd floor,
Nicole, you are exaggerating! There is no support from people on here in support of such violence. This is about mob mentality on the streets of Ukraine between 2 opposing mobs.
You need to blame those individuals and groups who engage in this violence and stop blaming people who are thousands of miles away.
I’m sitting on my couch reading about all this and because I live in the US you want to blame me or say I support one side over another because of the country I happen to live in?!
You are a seriously deluded individual.
Get real!
Joe you made the presumption in jumping to the conclusion that he was firing at unarmed people trying to escape the building.
You have also made the presumption that because shots were reported to have been fired from the roof of the building that they weren’t being fired from anywhere else.
Lets face it neither of us know exactly who he was firing at and why, so probably best keep an open mind until more evidence emerges.
Perhaps that Yatsenyuk can order a complete independent investigation into the shootings in Kiev on Feb. 20th as well, because if this is what an amateur can piece together, imagine what a proper investigation could unearth, a lot of people have blood on their hands and it’s not Berkut who instigated it, and by the looks of it they only fired on armed militants. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=668_1399131016
This is a must watch, if you watch mainstream edited clips of these shootings and draw the conclusion without questioning the story that the Berkut killed unarmed protestors, well more fool you.
It seems pretty clear to me people have been duped by corporate media into believing it was a brutal crackdown on unarmed protestors, I wonder will certain people have honesty to admit this now, the 2nd part will certainly uncover more media lies. From the day they showed it I was sceptical myself, the editing was so blatant I can’t understand how people fell for it so easily, suited some with their preconceived notions I guess.
Indeed Joe. I can’t really understand it. Maybe 70 of the demonisation of Russia has blinded people to facts. That and the fact that our country is not ours anymore but ruled by European banks. “He who pays the piper calls the tune”.Only explanations I can think of.
The dead in this incident were trade unionists and left-wing activists who were protesting against the new ultra-right government and defending a social building. They were trapped inside by baying mob of neo-nazis, and the building torched.
These fascists are Lynching people on the street, and now their controllers in government have introduced mass conscription.
I’m no fan of Russia, but somebody needs to intervene and destroy the neo-nazis that are taking over.
Why did the building need ‘defending’? The people in the building were the same who had been engaged in running battles with pro ukraine protesters that left 4 dead that day
If the Kiev govt is fascist then why did they appoint a Jew (Igor Kolmoisky) as governor of Dnepropetrovsk? A bank he owns was burned down by separatists last night in the Donetsk region.
There are definetly antisemitic elements to the Kiev government but they’re an extremely broad group. Most Ukrainian Jews support the interim adminstration and their Vaad condemned Putin for using them as a justification in intervening, citing antisemitism in Russia.
‘A bank he owns was burned down by separatists ‘ Did they cook anybody alive when they burnt it down?Anyway Nuland’s man Yats has no democratic mandate to be appointing his banker and oligarch buddies to governorships.
Putin is to blame. He started this by invading a friendly neighbour and arming/funding terrorists in Eastern Ukraine whom Vice News on youtube has confirmed included admitted Russian nationals like Alexander Mozhaev who spoke to the programme.
Obviously the deaths are tragic but all the evidence is that events in Odessa began when a pro-Russian mob shot at pro-Kiev demonstrators. Unfortunately for them they lost the battle and barricaded themselves inside a building which no doubt people suspected would be used to claim some kind of separatist ‘peoples republic” resided there. There is evidence those inside included persons firing at people outside.
A BBC link.So it must be gospel.Can anyone imagine the outrage if a pro-Russian mob cooked dozens of people to death in a building?Well we have commenters like Eamonn on here trying to pin this one on Putin.This was not Putin.This was Yat’s mad dogs.The Fascist Right Sector thugs that people have being warning about on these threads.
Eamonn you are deluded. Peaceful left wing and TU protesters were attacked by ultra right thugs. Murdered in a trade union building. It’s when you write that trash that it’s clear your brainwashed or you support the fascists. Which is it EAMONN?
That’s hilarious.This Eammonn guy is comedy gold.Lol.I’m literally in stitches laughing at your description of bit a rubbish and what looks like some bricks on a basement floor as a ‘petrol bomb factory’.
The Ukrainian Prime Minister has travelled to Odessa and held the Ukrainian security forces responsible for the deaths and has removed the local chief of police. It is a very volatile situation. The pro-Russian elements should refrain from occupying buildings they don’t own, from having provocative demonstrations and from attacking the Ukrainian police and army and allow the elections proceed as scheduled later this month.
Netanyahu in Budapest in spite of war crimes warrant as Hungary withdraws from the ICC
Updated
13 mins ago
10.6k
GDPR
Commissioner Michael McGrath says proposals to cut GDPR red tape is ‘forthcoming’
17 mins ago
1.0k
1
As it happened
Trump hits EU goods with 20% tariff and rails against foreigners 'pillaging' US
Updated
21 hrs ago
118k
215
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say