Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE GOVERNMENT MADE the decision yesterday not to follow the advice from the National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET) to move the country to a Level 5 lockdown.
Instead the whole country will be under Level 3 restrictions for three weeks from midnight tonight.
Advertisement
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said we were in a “very different situation” to March and that the “economic, social and non-Covid impacts of the response must be different now”.
Tánaiste Leo Varadkar – in a stinging rebuke of NPHET – last night pointed to the wider societal impact such as job losses, business closures and mental health implications of going back to full lockdown.
However, NPHET had warned that moving to Level 5 now was the “only opportunity” to get Covid-19 back “under control”. If Covid cases rise significantly over the coming weeks and months, it may be the case that further restrictions are eventually implemented.
So, what do you think? Do you think Ireland will be placed under Level 5 restrictions before the end of the year?
Poll Results:
Yes (9927)
No (2363)
In some counties but not the whole country (2242)
Not sure (466)
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
111 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Paul O Faolain: unfortunate thing is that at the moment the R number is hovering between 1.3 and 1.4, so cases will keep creeping up, and so far the virus has shown an approximate 4% fatality rate. It was also pointed out yesterday that at the current trends we run out of ICU beds in 3-4 weeks. Regardless of the politics, looks like it could be a cruel winter
@D Mems: Give over, Fatality rate of 4 percent is NonsenseYea in April when we weren’t testing people. Over 100 cases per day for over a month. No deaths yesterday. Deaths are down 97 percent on the peak.
@Monster Munch: simple maths, total confirmed cases are 38,539 with 1,810 deaths, that’s 4.69%. I know the fatality rate has and will fluctuate up and down, that’s why I said ‘so far’, but after 7 months is a good approximation.
@D Mems: lies, damn lies and of course… statistics. They weren’t even testing symptomatic people when the first wave hit so you know there were huge numbers infected who weren’t picked up in the stats, but it’s hard to miss a death so they never slip through the net. 4% is baloney and well you know it
@D Mems: You are correct the CFR for Ireland is 4%. But as serology studies predicted we had three times the cases in Ireland than first reported up to about July. So we would actually have around 90,000-100,000 cases in total meaning an IFR of around 1.8%.
@Paul O Faolain: Country can’t afford not to. If they don’t do it now, the economic cost will be far worse. The Government have just set us up for a Christmas lockdown because of their short sightedness. Had they gone to Level 5, families would have been able to celebrate Christmas together with some social distancing and other precautions. They would have spent lots of money on Christmas too. Well done Micky and Leo!
1) Government has 5 emergency Levels of measures re SARS-COV-2,where is the financial plan re workers, businesses,etc for these measures? Tanaiste mentioned not been able to afford Level 5.
If there’s no financial plan for these measures,why not?
Its not NPHET”s job to formulate financial plans for these measures,that’s the job of Government!
2)Why no urgency over providing extra capacity in Hospitals especially ICU’s for the different Levels?
Today there’s only 33 available Critical Care Beds available ,compared to eg 24th April, that’s a significant reduction of 76.92%!!
3) Looking at the detailed letter sent by email to Minister for Health &cc to Department of the Taoiseach and Chair of the Senior Officials Group for Covid-19 sent on Sunday,his detailed concerns are completely valid plus it’s obvious that Government received this letter Sunday and he said he’d be happy to discuss it further.
Who leaked that letter?I don’t believe the leak came from CMO.¡
4)Its the job of NPHET and CMO to use their various expertise, knowledge and skills to issue advice to Government,it’s not their job to formulate financial plans to support the measures needed, that’s Government’s job!It would be reasonable to acknowledge that and reasonable for the CMO and the public to assume that there would be financial plans to cover the different 5 Levels.
Baring that in mind,why did Tanaiste attack the CMO?
5)What is the Government plan if the country has to go to Level 5 and it doesn’t work?
Could Government publish that plan?If Government have no plan for that scenario then why attack the CMO?It’s not the CMO’s job to formulate economic plans!
The CMO has already given advice to increase capacity,staff, testing and tracing,etc and measures that can be taken now to prevent Level 5.
6) NPHET had gotten a worrying modelling report over projections for SARS-COV-2,it’s included in the letter,plus extra stats since last Acting CMO letter to Minister for Health on 1st October so knowing that why did Tanaiste say nothing had changed since then?
I never thought I’d be defending CMO Houlihan but Tanaiste’s personal attacks on him was totally wrong baring in mind all I’ve highlighted above and I absolutely don’t believe Tony Houlihan leaked that letter!
I know that in the past that as Tanaiste said they didn’t always follow NPHET’S advice but it’s foolish to ignore the level of concerns NPHET’ &CMO has as described in the email which is published:just Google :latest letters from CMO to Minister for Health.
@DK: it’s a perfect approximation of the fatality rate when counting positive cases. What’s the point in working out a fatality rate based on numbers of people tested. It’s obviously not going to be fatal for those that test negative. God sake.
@Cliodhna Lynch: I hope not. It’s just too drastic. A tighter restriction to level 4 and see what happens over the following 2/3 weeks. If level 5 is then needed then do it.
@Michael Carolan: By staying at L3 for longer, the situation gets worse far faster. Drastic steps taken now might have meant a chance for some sort of respite for Christmas; now that slim hope is gone, we’ll be back pacing our cages and watching super-spreader parties on social media. But hey, lobbyists know best, the rest of us can get on with dying for the extremely short-term benefit of the economy.
What a ridiculous poll unless intended to scare monger even further. The reality is that from midnight tonight, it might as well be a Level 5 bar a very few exceptions.
No other country in Europe has these and our incidence rate per 100k people is one of the lowest in Europe still.
Our main issue… Surprise surprise, seems to be the extreme lack of ICU capacity as again (surprise surprise) the Government did not do anything or invest properly over the summer to create dozens more ICU spaces, acting prudently.
So now, thousands of people in hospitality will lose their jobs, thousands of families without a proper income, thousands of family homes at risk of eviction as this Government also voted down a bill to guard against evictions and rent increases last week only
@Bountyop: our 14 day incidence rate per 100k is just around the 100 mark. There are many with over 300 and some at over 200. 12 countries higher than us in total https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea
@Nigel o’Neill: Other countries are imposing far stricter measures, look at Paris closing all cafes and bars, Spain has severe lockdowns in several different regions now including Madrid and Valencia, Italy put strict measures and proper enforcement in place early and is managing to keep second wave numbers much lower than France, Spain and the UK. Our incidence rate is nowhere near the lowest in Europe right now and is rising at an alarming rate in many different parts of the country. We need an all-island approach with strict measures and proper enforcement if we want to get some measure of control before Christmas.
@Kevin Lonergan: you may have noticed that Paris and Madrid are indeed Cities, not countries as you referred to them and thus Localised Lockdowns as indeed has been in play in Dublin
@Lee Galiezitte: – “5 October From tomorrow (Tuesday 6th October) Paris is to shut all bars, gyms and swimming pools for two weeks in a bid to combat the spread of coronavirus. The move comes as the city’s coronavirus alert status is raised to maximum”
@Nigel o’Neill: As for the lockdown in Dublin, I live in the city centre and I can assure you that the vast majority of cafés and restaurants with outside seating in the city centre, are not abiding by the rule that states they can have no more than 15 customers seated outside. As for distancing between tables, I have yet to come across any that are implementing that rule.
If the numbers keep rising and we don’t move to level 5, it’s a safe bet it’s because the current shambolic government doesn’t want the political fallout of NPHET being proved right.
@The Risen: nonsense. Level 5 when we have gone through level 3 and 4 first and they don’t stem it. Can’t go level 5 when NI is still not locked down and we have not even enforced level 2/3 properly.
Government is snookered either way. If we were in level 5 today everyone would be saying the who runs the country and they destroyed business etc etc.
@The Risen: if we went to level 5 yesterday you would have been giving out. If we go to level 5 you will give out. Classic opposition wanting it every which way and criticising every action taken regardless.
Like everyone I dont want any lockdown but by not moving to a level 5 now means we are more likely to be in a level 5 at xmas which no one wants. We should of moved to a level 5 now so we could have relatively normal xmas. This whole pandemic really highlights the main issues we have with our healthcare system, the very little beds we have, it wasnt for that we wouldn’t need the lockdown at extreme levels.
@Siobhan Rosemary: moving to a level 5 now would put thousands and thousands out of jobs and close businesses up and down the country.
If people just stick to the guidelines and think about their actions then maybe we wont need to go to level 4 or 5.
@Siobhan Rosemary: if there was ever a time I’d except a level 5, it would be Christmas. Last lockdown felt like Christmas day on a loop. I’m normally away for Christmas. So not looking forward to it either way.
@Derek Lyster: but that’s the thing people are not listening and doing as they please. So it’s only a matter of time before we will have to go to a level 5. It’s not what I want but by the looks of things that’s what will most likely happen so I’d rather a level 5 now instead of level 3 leading to a 5 which draws it out longer and will ruin xmas
@Siobhan Rosemary: like our lady full lockdown, level 5 will last for many months. There is no way it would be over by Christmas. The first lockdown was meant to be for 2 weeks and we never fully reopened
@Dave Barrett: parties and anti-mask marches are annoying but they are not what makes the pandemic grow. Unfortunately most infections come from hospitals, care homes, factories and now probably schools, all places that cannot just close without doing huge damage to society.
Calling the Gardai because your neighbours are having 10 people over, or arresting a few anti-maskeejits won’t actually make any substantial difference to the development of the pandemic.
Level 5 won’t work unless our land border with the other state is closed and everyone arriving here is placed in quarantine.
So its Either the New Zealand approach or the Swedish approach, and we all know they won’t quarantine travellers like New Zealand. Sooo??
@David Lee: we are pretty much the Swedish way..
by asking rather than enforcing as they do elsewhere. We have had greater success in keeping deaths down. Swedish numbers are low now as they do not trace and test… They just tell anyone positive to “tell their mates” and only people with serious symptoms are tested. Many of our positives come from contact tracing and have mild or no symptoms – Sweden does not do this so of course their numbers will be low. It will be interesting to see what happens to the Swedish retirement and nursing home which have been closed for months and were scheduled to re-open to visitors on the 1st October. (Yes the Swedish model has kept nursing homes closed for longer than anywhere else among other things).
@Mark: we really don’t require anyone coming into the country to increase infection rates, we have done a pretty good job on our own over the last two months…if we want to know why that is, we need to be looking inward at our own collective behaviour, not outward for someone else to blame…
@Dave McCabe: absolutely… the morale of the country might improve if people who went against the public health advice and guidelines faced some consequences instead of pushing us all towards level 4 and 5.
No. Because Level 5 Restrictions means putting 500,000 people out of their jobs and onto PUP. A bit of sanity was restored yesterday. NPHET were publicly slapped down.
No. The people and the country cannot afford it at the risk of having zero healthcare in the future which is what happens in austerity. Also, a lockdown will solve absolutely nothing. It only delays the inevitable. The first one was necessary to put tools in place. It’s not a band aid to be used over and over again.
Focus most resources on the most vulnerable, increase capacity in hospitals and stop this myopic approach , the fighting and finger pointing.
Absolutely…. walked in to a shop this morning with my mum as she needed milk.. I counted six people with no masks on.. late twenties/ thirties…. so I turned my mum around and walked back out… I was shocked .. Some people just don’t care
@Maria Heraty:
Shop needs to bar people not wearing masks. It really comes down to businesses being responsible if the public aren’t.
My local supermarket will not let you in without a mask. And rightly so.
The constant refrain is listen to science, listen to scientists and to medical experts.
This is a link to a declaration from epidemiologists, immunologist and other health and science experts in America, has been endorsed and co-signed by over two thousand other medical and scientific experts and practitioners along with tens of thousands of private citizens, calling for a change in approach in Dealing with Covid 19, away from the devastation caused by lockdowns and towards Focused Protection of the vulnerable that would leave the rest of society, particularly the young, able to continue with normal living and development.
Similar expert denunciation of lockdowns have come from Canada, Germany and Australia.
They should not be ignored.
Unless a treatment is coming soon I’d say Mieheal Martin will be remembered as the granny killer. Fingers crossed they know something about an upcoming treatment we dont.
We are looking at this wrong. Sweden currently has no lockdown and a 14 day infection rate of 32 per 100k. We are over 100. There are numerous studies now out that show lockdowns are ineffective. We need to look at worldwide data and come up with evidence based strategies. That way we will bring everyone with us. Otherwise the government will be stuck in this never ending cycle and our economy and social structures will be destroyed.
@Jay Kearney: Yes, fine those who won’t wear masks or have house parties. Only when it hits one’s pockets it will work, even the UK have introduced fines as well as other countries in Europe. Eg: France.
Obviously, Tony needs the glory. He thinks the people still love him, he has a God complex. Also, the government don’t have a Plan B. FF need the boost that FG got in the polls. Leo should try and work more constructively instead of acting as opposition. Two weeks and Level 5. We ran into level 3 eyes wide shut.
As the gardai have been given no powers to restrict movement or break up gatherings I think we will be at Level 4 before we know it. No point in putting the country onto Level 3 if the rules aren’t being enforced. Joke of government, those that don’t follow the guidelines need to be dealt with, hit them where it hurts, in the pocket with fines, otherwise Level 2, 3 or 4 makes very little difference. When will this limp government ever get the message.
I mean we shouldn’t be so morbidly sure about this sort of thing. Who knows maybe level 3 will help us now that we’ve been scared by the prospect of level 5. Or maybe I’m just naive but by god I’d rather be naive about these things then depressingly cynic about it all like some of the folks you see on here
Yes, it will happen, and we’ll be under level 5 restrictions significantly longer when it does happen, than we would be if we bit the bullet and did it right now.
Level 5 by early December. Christmas will be a chicken and toilet roll. The only plus side is I don’t have to visit any relatives or worse, have them visiting me and drinking my fine wines.
Silly question really.
If cases continue to rise, hospitalisation rises and deaths rise, then yes, naturally we will have no choice but to do it.
If cases stabilise and deaths/hospitalisation remains low, then I think we will be hovering between level 2 and 3 …maybe even 4 for the remainder of the pandemic.
Level 5 would be a national disaster and really should be brought in as a last resort/worst case scenario. It shouldn’t be introduced on a whim by NPHET.
@Darren Anthony Corr:
I’ll also like to add, I just returned from (an essential) trip to Denmark (and yes I’m being a good citizen and restricting my movement) but I have to say, for a country with the same population as ourselves, similar number of daily cases and a similar 14 day incidence rate, they are just getting on with it.
Bars/restaurants close at 10, hand sanitizers at entrances to shops/restaurants and mandatory masks on public transport. But from looking at the media/tv over there it wasn’t all that they talked about. Life is going on outside this island, meanwhile we are revelling in the hysteria it seems.
House parties and casual no-mask wearers are annoying to those of us who respect the guidelines, but they are not what makes the pandemic grow. Unfortunately most infections come from hospitals, care homes, factories and now probably schools, all places that cannot just close without doing huge damage to society.
Calling the Gardai because your neighbours are having 10 people over, or arresting a few anti-maskeejits won’t actually make any substantial difference to the development of the pandemic.
I’m afraid it may happen. The government were right to reject Level 5 for the present. However, Holohan only has to sit tight and if the infection count goes up (as it probably would anyway) he can then say he warned us.
Why punish the people who are following the rules. Clamp down on those who break the rules.
The talk of limiting off licence sales because of the likes of what happened in Spanish arch or at house parties is what’s wrong. Why punish everyone rather than those drinking on the streets or at these gatherings. Putting good people out of work rather than punish rule breakers is just not right.
What’s the difference, work all day, try to sleep, work all day, try to sleep when you can, and occasionally buy something to eat. Been my life for the last 7 months or so already. Nothing has changed except i can even get the odd decent meal anymore again.
The US Commerce Secretary says Ireland runs a 'tax scam'. Does he have a point?
Paul O'Donoghue
5 hrs ago
4.8k
45
Quiz
Quiz: How many of these Dáil rules do you know?
7 hrs ago
11.2k
Áras An Uachtaráin
134 members of the Oireachtas say they will not nominate McGregor for the presidency
21 hrs ago
40.3k
151
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say