Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AP/Press Association Images
Opinion
Column Destroying democracy to save democracy – Egypt’s power struggle
The Egyptian military see the Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to its power base and have co-opted secularists as a public façade for a naked power grab, writes Colm Ó Broin.
7.00am, 30 Aug 2013
94
32
LIKE EVERY MILITARY regime in history, the recently installed junta in Egypt claims to have the support of the people. The mandate for overthrowing the democratically-elected Muslim Brotherhood government on 3 July rests on the claim of popular approval, but so far there is no verifiable evidence that this claim is true.
The pro-coup Tamarod movement says that 22 million Egyptians signed its petition calling on President Mohamed Morsi to step down while the figures cited for the pivotal 30 June demonstrations have fluctuated wildly from 8 million, 14 million, 20 million to the truly ludicrous 33 million.
There is no way to definitively count the number of people who took to the streets on that day or to prove that the petition numbers are genuine. This is why we have elections, because they are the most accurate way we have to discover the will of the people.
Religious politics has evident support
Unfortunately for the secularists who spearheaded the 2011 overthrow of Hosni Mubarak, they kept failing at the ballot box following that historic event.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) won 47 per cent of the seats in elections to Egypt’s lower house of parliament last year, while the even more extreme Nour Party won 25 per cent. They had similar landslide victories in elections to the upper house. This does not suggest a population that wants no role for religion in politics or wider society.
The 2012 Presidential election was a narrower affair. In the second round run-off FJP candidate Mohamed Morsi won with 52 per cent of the vote. A former Mubarak-era Prime Minister, Ahmed Shafiq received 48 per cent. The Brotherhood also won two referendums, including one which ratified the constitution.
The army has justified the coup by claiming that Morsi’s support among the public had collapsed since his election and that it was merely enforcing the popular will. According to a Pew opinion poll, carried out in March, Morsi had the most favourable rating (53 per cent) of the main party leaders. Two-thirds of the public had a favourable view of the Muslim Brotherhood, again the highest of the main political parties.
In the same poll 58 per cent of respondents said that the country’s laws should “strictly follow the teachings of the Koran” while another 28 per cent said that laws should follow the “values and teachings of the Koran”. This contradicts the narrative that Egyptians are revolting against the Muslim Brotherhood over allegations that it was ‘Islamising’ the country.
Incidentally the new military regime has already stated that Article 2 of the constitution will stay the same as it was under Morsi and Mubarak, an article that states that Islam is the official religion of Egypt and that Sharia law is the main source of legislation.
Conflicting results
Two-thirds of respondents to the Pew poll backed the democratic process while 21 per cent said that “in some circumstances a non-democratic form of government can be preferable.” Another poll carried out for the pro-coup Arab American Institute in June showed that a majority of the public (56 per cent) rejected a “temporary military takeover” as a solution to the political crisis with 87 per cent backing “real national dialogue”.
Opinion polls in Egypt are notoriously inaccurate so the claims of the army and its supporters could indeed be true, but the only real way to test the public mood is to have free and fair elections. There is a problem for the military however, if the Muslim Brotherhood wins the elections this will show that their putsch and everything they have been doing since 3 July was completely illegitimate.
The coup leaders will obviously be very reluctant to let that happen so reports that they are considering either banning the Brotherhood or restricting the number of seats the FJP can win in the parliament, or even outlawing all parties with a religious platform, are no surprise. It also begs the question as to why such measures would be necessary if the Brotherhood’s support had collapsed.
Any system excluding religious parties that won 70 per cent of the vote at the parliamentary elections last year would be totally undemocratic and would shatter the claims by coup cheerleaders that the removal of Morsi is a “continuation of the revolution”.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the most popular party
The Muslim Brotherhood is undoubtedly a reactionary organisation which has engaged in sectarian hate-mongering and whose supporters have committed violence against the security forces, political opponents and the Christian minority.
It is also the most popular party in Egypt according to election results and little or no evidence has been presented of an imminent attempt by it to abolish the democratic system and install an Islamic theocracy. Justifications of the coup on this basis are therefore very similar to claims that democratic left-wing governments in Latin America had to be overthrown because they were about to create authoritarian communist regimes.
Meanwhile the new military regime is ruling like most military regimes, through repression and terror. They have suspended the democratically endorsed presidency, parliament and constitution. They have closed down critical media outlets and rounded up hundreds of opposition activists. Their media outlets are engaged in their own hate campaign, against the Brotherhood and its voters, while also promoting xenophobia and risible conspiracy theories (demonstrating that secularists can be just as irrational and fanatical as the religious).
Expanding repression
The regime’s forces have killed over a thousand anti-coup protesters, the vast, vast majority of whom were unarmed. The non-Islamists cheered on as the army crushed the democratic rights of the Brotherhood and its supporters, but now, predictably, the regime is expanding its repression beyond the initial targets to secularists who object to its policies.
They face vilification as ‘traitors’ by the pro-junta media, as has happened to Mohamed El Baradei since he stepped down as Vice-President in protest as the Rabaah al-Adawiya massacre. He is now being sued in court for “betraying national trust”. Other secularists who speak out or campaign against the regime will face similar treatment.
The military see the Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to its power base and have co-opted secularists as a public façade for a naked power grab. Together they are destroying democracy to save democracy.
Colm Ó Broin is a freelance journalist.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Baffling how the Irish-Left sympathizes with Islamic Conservatives who support lighting gays on fire, stoning women to death, blowing up Jews in the name of “Allah”, imposing Sharia Law, etc. They Irish-Left are vicious when it comes to our so-called “conservatives” who would instantly be interpreted as liberals by the Muslim countries and even viewed as liberal by Eastern Europeans and many US Republicans. The German Army should have done what the Egyptian Army did when Hitler and his crew were democratically elected. There has to be a line drawn. I don’t sympathize at all with MB protestors. The irony crying about democracy while using the democratic process which got you in power to end democracy.
What your witnessing is a counter revolution. I know the Irish left aren’t supporting Islamist or militarist coup governments. What’s really going on is the ruling class have decided they like things the way they where under Mubarak and with US backing and AiD they have stolen a revolution, by criminalising an elected government and killing its activists.
Democracy and Islam are not compatible. A working democracy is judged upon how it treats it minorities and the Morsi regime’s record speaks for itself. Religion poisons everything; politics; sport; human rights. It divides people and justifies bigotry and hatred.
It is nothing short of revolting what religion demands from humanity people should wake up and stop defending this obscenity. Freedom of religion should be a basic human right but also freedom from religion should be respected, The Muslim Brotherhood clearly rejects this; ask the non-Muslims who tried to live under the Muslim brotherhood tyranny.
The politically correctness of this article is nothing short of vomit inducing.
Religion is the root of this. It is intolerant; savage it promotes ignorance, division and bigotry.
Religious Apologists are hypocrites they demand respect for their bigotry and superstition yet they get offended by criticism.
“All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.”
– Thomas Paine, (1737-1809), The Age of Reason, pt. 1,
If the Muslim Brotherhood actually respected democracy then the military would have never ousted them. What has happened in Egypt proves that religion and politics do not go well and should always be kept apart.
I had hoped the the democratic will that brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power might moderate their position. I was heartened when I heard that Morsi ordered the Gaza smuggling tunnels filled with concrete, that they in no way were allied to Hamas. But the brutal overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood by the military only means they will never trust democracy again but may seek more violent means to attain power. It seems Egypt is back to where it was with Mubarak.
These “anti Imperialists”, LOL. Align themselves with the greatest imperialist movement ever known to man, The Islamic Caliphate. Which the Muslim Brotherhood openly wants to restore.
Be it Erdogan islamising Turkey or Hamas who were “elected” in typical Muslim Brotherhood style aka one election and then claim for 8 years without an election your still “democratic”.
The Muslim Brotherhood is an enormous well financed organisation and with it’s EURO HQ here in Ireland we can be sure it has it’s grip on our government and journalists. Isn’t it obvious, our journalists refuse to openly write about the connection between the Halawa family and the MB and the Euro HQ of the MB in Clonskeagh Mosque.
Firstly, Since when did democracy begin and end with elections ?
Democracy is about freedom of press,freedom of religion,protection of woman and minorities. The Muslim Brotherhood were changing the constitution and the Egyptian people didn’t want that.That is anti democratic.
You really showed how you were here to promote your propaganda with the use of the word “junta”.
What is hilarious is Why is the Irish Anti War Movement part of the pro Morsi rallies ? Why is Raymond Deane of the IPSC and other members of the IPSC (Ireland Palestinian Solidarity Campaign) ,Mags O’Brien of SIPTU and Richard Boyd Barrett TD all taking part in pro Morsi,pro Muslim Brotherhood rallies outside the Egyptian Embassy ?? What a weird alliance ? Or is it really ? The European HQ of the Muslim Brotherhood is in Clonskeagh ,Do they make “donations” to RICH Boy Barrett and the IPSC and the IAWM ?
Here are the pics of them all at the pro Muslim Brotherhood rally.
Very good article. If you truly believe in the democratic process do you have to support a democratically elected government who’s beliefs and actions are in many ways totalitarian and you deeply disagree with? It also compromises the wests support of Israel, because for years Israel has been described as the only genuine democracy in the Middle East. For a few months there was a second which has now been overthrown by a military supplied with guns by the west.
Interesting article, but events in Egypt present a real dilemma.
Democracy doesn’t always get it right – I don’t normally subscribe to Godwin’s law but this might be a good time to remember that even Hitler was democratically elected.
True democracy is about respecting the views of the entire electorate and forming policies that accommodate everyone to as great an extent as possible, not just winning at the ballot box and taking it as carte blanche to do as you please regardless of the views of those who voted for AND against you – this would just make you an elected dictator.
If 51 foxes voted to eat 49 chickens this would be a democratic vote, but does it represent democracy as most people understand it?
In addition, it is arguable that religion and politics should never mix.
The next few months will be very interesting and revealing in Egypt…
You have a huge poor population, highly religious and highly under educated with very little awareness with anything but what is said in the mosque or on tv. In such an environment bring a politicised, violent islamic group which is flashing its wealth to gain political gain and using religion to paint any political resistance from other parties as unbelievers (‘kafereen’, ‘haram’). Do you really think there is any democratic process has happened there? The egyptian revolution was not a religious revolution, but those who won the ballot were! What is the future of the 15% christian population in Egypt under such rule?? Who is going to protect them if the security forces will be controlled by those who don’t want them is this country?
Firstly, Since when did democracy begin and end with elections ?
Democracy is about freedom of press,freedom of religion,protection of woman and minorities. The Muslim Brotherhood were changing the constitution and the Egyptian people didn’t want that.That is anti democratic.
You really showed how you were here to promote your propaganda with the use of the word “junta”.
What is hilarious is Why is the Irish Anti War Movement part of the pro Morsi rallies ? Why is Raymond Deane of the IPSC and other members of the IPSC (Ireland Palestinian Solidarity Campaign) ,Mags O’Brien of SIPTU and Richard Boyd Barrett TD all taking part in pro Morsi,pro Muslim Brotherhood rallies outside the Egyptian Embassy ?? What a weird alliance ? Or is it really ? The European HQ of the Muslim Brotherhood is in Clonskeagh ,Do they make “donations” to RICH Boy Barrett and the IPSC and the IAWM ?
A well presented article. Sadly it highlights the central problem in that region of the world which is that democracy as we accept it in Western society simply does not work there. There are too many ideologies and religious extremes in existence incapable of accepting a straight majority rule.
Couple that with the vested interests of Western powers in oil and military supplies and you have the instability which haunts the Middle East.
Can I offer a humble opinion as to a solution? Absolutely not. There is no one easy solution to the problems of governance in those countries, however, one small step,would be for the bigger Western Powers to stop interfering in their affairs.
Interesting article and it’s good that it scrutinises the numbers the coup’s supporters claimed came out in support of it, as these figures were always going to be exagerrated.
I think one of the key factors about whether you believe the coup was justified or not comes down to which definition of democracy you accept. If you believe that democracy is only about the ballot box, then obviously the coup was illegitimate. However, if you believe that democracy doesn’t end at election day, and should enshrine wider rights and respect for minorities, than you would probably believe that overall the overthrow of Morsi was a good thing.
This comes back to the Pew polls, that Colm Ó Bróin mentioned in his piece. Interestingly, a recent Pew Research Centre found that the Egyptian Muslim public are considerably less tolerant of religious pluralism than Muslims elsewhere.
“Egypt is one of the few countries where a clear majority (74%) of sharia supporters say both Muslims and non-Muslims in their country should be subject to Islamic law.”
The study also found that:
“Egyptian Muslims also back criminalizing apostasy, or leaving Islam for another religion. An overwhelming majority of Egyptian Muslims (88%), say converting away from Islam should be punishable by death. Among the 37 countries where the question was asked, a median of 28% of Muslims say apostates should be subject to the death penalty.”
So could it be argued that the government of Morsi, by giving Sharia Law more of a central role in the governance of Egypt, was actually reflecting what the Egyptian people wanted? Herein lies the paradox: it would seem that democracy, purely defined as an expression of the people’s will, can’t coincide with the rights-based interpretation of democracy, when the people’s will is to trample all over the rights of others.
Egypts peasant population are very much like the Irish were a century ago. Poor uneducated and deeply devout. They believe that their Imams can do no wrong and what ever they say must be right because these are very “educated” men. (very much the same way we used to see the parish priest). During the Election those self same Imams told the peasants who to vote for because it easy the peasants “right” thing to do. Now the fact that the MB were pouring money into building new mosques up and down the country I am sure had an impact on a devout population.
This is a good article, however we will never know what would have happened at the next election if the MB did not win, would they cede power? I doubt it very much. Michael Jansen has had some good stuff in the Irish times on their world view.
Red Cross says Gaza hospitals 'overwhelmed' after Israeli strikes kill more than 400 people
Updated
1 hr ago
32.9k
Garda Operation
Over 210 motorists arrested for driving under the influence during St. Patrick's weekend
13 mins ago
659
5
Analysis
A call to action in St Patrick's Cathedral today hit home hard after scenes in the White House
Christina Finn
Reports from New York
18 hrs ago
88.5k
236
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say