Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
The flags of the NATO member states are hoisted during the ceremonial handover of the new NATO�headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, 25 May 2017. DPA/PA Images
Opinion
Retired Colonel Dorcha Lee Is joining NATO the price for Irish reunification?
As debates continued this week around how a united Ireland would look, Lee outlines the defence challenges it would pose.
7.01am, 26 Mar 2021
32.8k
75
LAST SUNDAY WAS Census Day in Northern Ireland. It is expected to show the current feeling of national identity in the NI population and could well confirm the reported demographic shift away from a unionist majority.
In the last Census (2011), 40% declared themselves to be British, 25% Irish and 21% Northern Irish. In the meantime, we have had Brexit and the rise of the pro-independence movement in Scotland. This 2021 Census could well be the last Census ever in NI as part of the UK.
If the UK union is really weakening, it is now more than probable that Border referendums on the reunification of the island of Ireland will take place within the next five to ten years.
Sinn Féin has called for referendums to be held much sooner. In the past, referendums have been lost in Ireland because the electorate was not informed nor fully convinced of the proposals being put to them.
The lesson learned is that a full and honest debate should take place before a referendum, not, as in the case of the UK’s Brexit Referendum, afterwards.
We should remember the Nice Referendum in 2001 and the Lisbon Referendum in 2008, which were both lost on the neutrality issue.
Advertisement
Defence Policy for a United Ireland needed
In any future referendums on Irish reunification the issue of what defence policy a united Ireland should adopt, needs to be considered. In fact, it should be addressed, in advance, so that voters, North and South, know the full picture before making such a momentous decision on reunification.
Two key questions need to be answered. First, would the people in the South support joining NATO as part of the price of reunification? Conversely, would the people of Northern Ireland accept leaving NATO and supporting military neutrality as part of reunification?
At present, the Northern Ireland taxpayer is paying seven times more on defence (2% of GDP) than his/her Southern counterpart (0.27% of GDP). The EU average is 1.2% while the NATO average is 1.3% of GDP.
There is a third option, to be raised and set aside, which is that both current jurisdictions retain their present defence policies after reunification. However, if unification means that the all-Ireland State will be sovereign and independent, it is hard to see how two different and contradictory defence policies could be in place on one island.
Foreign and defence policies go hand in hand. It might, in theory, work, if Ireland were to become a two-state confederation of separate and independent states, pursuing two separate foreign and defence policies.
Of course, a confederal solution should be an option to be examined, along with a unitary state and a federal state. Nevertheless, even in a confederal situation, it would be doubtful that two separate defence forces, would be what the Irish people might have in mind by reunification.
Back in Dec 1993, the UK agreed, in the Downing Street Declaration, that it had “no selfish strategic or economic interest” in remaining in NI.
This does not mean that the UK will accept a weakening in its national defence arising from Irish reunification. Such a weakening of its national defence, on its North Atlantic flank, could occur if NI became part of an undefended neutral Ireland and if Scotland were also to become independent.
Ireland, the weak link
Up to recently, the North Atlantic had faded in strategic importance since the end of the Cold War. However, Swedish defence analysts have concluded that Russian military exercises in the Baltic area, along the Arctic Circle and down the North-Eastern Atlantic coastline, including in Irish territorial waters, is about cutting the link between the US and Europe.
Read Next
Related Reads
Major funding for NI centenary set to be announced, as local politicians push for greater role in planning
Polls and pandemics: How Northern Ireland's two leaders are facing defiance and disappointment
Cross-border co-operation on Covid-19 raises hopes for all-island healthcare system amid Brexit fears
The outgoing Officer Commanding Naval Operations Command, Captain (NS) Brian Fitzgerald, has pointed out that a large number of transatlantic cables, linking the two continents, are at their most vulnerable in the shallow waters off the Irish Continental Shelf. Maybe some might think we can manage very well without the Internet. Others would disagree.
The problem for the UK and NATO is not Irish Neutrality, but the long-standing underfunding of our Defence Forces for its primary role of national defence.
Until recently, as a defence analyst, I had hoped that Irish-British mutual defence issues could be addressed ultimately within the context of EU Common Defence. With Brexit, this is no longer possible.
Alternatively, I had thought that an Irish Government would start to move towards bringing defence spending in line with other nations, which would mean that we would no longer be the weak link in Europe’s North Atlantic Defence. It seems I am wrong on both counts.
Until we sort out the defence issue, it is probably best to forget about Irish reunification.
Colonel Dorcha Lee (retd) is a former Defence Forces Provost Marshal and Director of Military Police. He is a former Irish Military Advisor in Brussels and a former military representative to the WEU and the EU.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
The numbers are going in the right direction. RIP to those who have lost their lives. As hard as it is, keep sticking to the rules… we are nearly there.
@Happy entertainment: there was no testing at the tallaght centre mon, tues or today. Must be fewer cases being referred for testing so they are doing them all in one day now rather than spreading them out over 5 days.
@Happy entertainment: Th roads were the buissiest i’ve seen them too in months. And i’ve been driving to work the whole time. bit worried about what we may see in about 2 weeks time.
@Happy entertainment: just to balance that I’ve heard from someone that tests two places are only doing afternoon testing now as there’s no need for a.m at at present
5th worst per capita in the world, New Zealand is better than us, US is better than us,Cheltenham was the governments fault, Italian tourists, 2 meter rule. Ok, got all the negatives out of the way ( usual ones). Positively. Nice to see it steadying out and going the right way. Sad for those who died and their families.
@John fitzpatrick: nonsense moans. Social media mob rubbish about Cheltenham and Italians. Zero proof. I suppose today’s are keelings fault and next week will be leo and his picnics fault. Virus was here since before Christmas and certainly well active in the community before March.
Lunacy comparing us to New Zealand and US. Doesn’t even deserve a response. Stats are totally skewed by how countries report it.
@John fitzpatrick: No. It’s all down to volume of testing and what countries attribute to death on death cert. The only way we will know exactly how different countries mortality rates will be in 12 months when you can see the % increase in average deaths over a previous 5 year period. Brazil looking to be number one for sure. Many scientists believe the true number of infections in brazil is north of 5 million.
I wouldn’t be so sure about the U.S. Their numbers are SLIGHTLY better, but firstly, they are a couple of weeks behind us as it hit the U.S. a little later, I think, and their numbers haven’t really started coming down yet to the extent ours have, so we should probably be comparing their figures with ours a couple of weeks ago, the way we compared ourselves with Italy a couple of weeks before earlier. Also, I am not sure if they are counting probable deaths, so their death rate may actually be higher if they counted as we did. It’s very hard to compare across countries, given that different countries count deaths differently and different countries are at different places as it arrived in different countries at different times.
@Philip King ⚡️: awwww come guys. I could not find the sarcasm font on here. I was only trying to get all the moans we usually see on here out early. Phillip. It’s a stat usually thrown out here that has been proven wrong many times.
@John fitzpatrick: ahh the old per head of capita nonsense. If other countries were reporting as transparently as us then we would be 15-20th on the list. Can’t have a league table if some teams are not reporting dropped points.
@Philip King ⚡️: he’s talking about the “per capita” figures, which if looked at like that, yes Ireland has fared pretty badly compared to the rest of the world. We have one of the highest number of cases per 100,000, well ahead of other EU countries. We’re certainly in the top 10 most affected countries. You can track it here: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/cumulative-cases
@Daniel O Sullivan: again it depends hows its reported. We were Including community, hospital, nursing home and also probable deaths. The uk were reporting on hospital deaths at one stage.
@Paul O’Sullivan: he said Per Capita – Not Per Capital. So the figures for New York and London are not what he is comparing to Dublin!. The USA has an approximate population of 331,000,000 with 100,418 deaths – meaning 303deaths per million. Ireland has a population of 4,937,000 with 1639 deaths – meaning 332 deaths per million. clearly, Ireland is worse “Per Capita”.
However, using per capita figures can be misleading. Belgium has a population of 11,460,000 with 9,364 deaths – meaning 817 deaths per million.
@Brian Madden: yes and there is still some issues about what is being reported when especially as regards in the community. They are sdtill only settin gv and up their track and trace unit.
@John fitzpatrick: I give up, well at least I give up my satire career. Over before it started, shot down in a ball of flames. I have spent weeks saying that stat was not correct and only a stat on reported deaths, not actual deaths. But today I thought I’d mention it before the usual suspects. And just for the record, I don’t blame Cheltenham, the Italians or anyone else. Yesterday someone compared us to the Isle of Man. Ok, into retirement I go.
@Gary Pheasey: well aware what he was implying, but I’m sick of all that per capita nonsense…. they are only statistics, it means nothing to the individuals that have lost their lives.
Behind every life lost is a personal journey of one person on earth. And we only live once. Statistics especially per capita are useless information…
But a country with 330 million and having 100 000 deaths plus and our small nation having just over 1600 plus it is all immaterial it is a loss of a life, an individual, ……
@John fitzpatrick: for anyone really interested in stats, this link was posted by a journal commenter this morning https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/
It is a measure and comparison of death rates and variences over the last few years in European countries. It uses a scoring system to even out population differences. Over the last 16 weeks while our death rate is above the norm Ireland had one of the flattest curves and is regarded as moderate. Most of the other countries have spikes. An interesting point is that reported deaths last week were below our norm.
@John fitzpatrick: You can’t believe ANYTHING coming from America. The people are afraid to even GET a test. There’s crazy rumours it will stop you getting health insurance or join the military
@John fitzpatrick: they simply aren’t counting deaths in the same way, we include ALL PROBABLE deaths whereas many countries do not and only go off whether or not the deceased have had a positive test before they passed.
@Derdaly: actually that’s a very interesting chart. It shows that we had nearly the same spikes in 2017 and 2018. But compared to other countries at just over a 6% increase in actual deaths , we are way better than many and sitting somewhere in the middle. Ok, that’s a stat that you can compare countries as it measures increases in deaths year on year.
@Derdaly: that’s a great link, the z-scores would seem to indicate we’ve done alright compared to many other countries. Must keep an eye on that one.
Won’t suit the doomlords though.
Give it a rest ffs. So Cheltenham was the Government’s fault? The last time I checked Chaltenham is in England not Ireland. Also those Italian fans who came over had nothing got to do with cases here.
Ireland looks very good here when compared… We have done a great job and one of them is our testing levels are some of the highest in the world… We counted people despite the political cost unlike some other countries.
I would ask, should we be testing everyone coming from other countries?
@john: just drove around beaches here in Wexford loads of cars parked on road as beaches are closed if anything happened no way emergency services could get through. Car reg nos being taken
@john: According to Prof Luke O’Neil (Professor (Chair of Biochemistry) Affiliations: School of Biochemistry and Immunology TCD) today, you’re 19 times less likely to catch it outdoors than in so beach seems like a good idea. Also said that 10% of cases caused other 80%,super spreaders he called them. Most people don’t infect anyone else. Also said singing or shouting in close quarters not a good idea. Obviously paraphrasing him but interview is on Newstalk.
@Jane Aelst: good woman Jane. Let’s lock us all in our country. The air is clear so we should have a good view of the rest of the world opening up around us.
Fergus O’Dowd is blaming the big companies who own the Nursing Homes for not investing more. We just rented out every private fascility in the country (with staff) but did not utilise it. He said that only 23% were viral control complacent. If the companies werent up to scratch or finacially liable thats an oversight and questions why they had licenses to operate. The government were the ones to oversee. Everyone knew what was coming with the Nursing Homes. Its an absolute tragedy. Its not about blame, but our ability to take responsibility.
@Feardorcha Ó Maolomhnaigh: you don’t know it caused their premature deaths. If someone had covid and got knocked down by a car and died they would go into the stats as died “with” covid 19. Lots of those who had covid had mild symptoms but if they died of a stroke or heart attack which they were in imminent danger of but covid didn’t cause then they would also go down as died “with” covid 19.
@Dino:
The numbers recorded, are people who have died because of contracting Covid-19. Your example of a car accident in completely incorrect.
The Maynooth /UL study of RIP.ie show an increase in deaths for the March/ April period over 2019 which is close to the reported number of Covid-19 deaths.
This virus kills causes people to die, and has been the cause of death for over 1600 Irish people since early March.
@Gary Kearney: have you a source for that? Because otherwise its just going to be a back and forwards me saying your wrong and you saying I’m wrong. It says died “with” not dies as a result or part result of having contracted coronavirus, seems pretty clear to me
Did Tony say they will continue to report confirmed and probable deaths? I haven’t heard probable figures been mentioned in a long time. Are they just included in the overall and not declared as X amount of the total are probable? Probable means they suspect the person who died might of had covid but not based on any testing?
Harry’s ‘toxic brand’ impacted charity he founded in honour of Diana, says chair
15 mins ago
1.1k
2
Healthcare
Health unions suspend planned 'work-to-rule' following talks with the HSE
49 mins ago
886
social welfare changes
If you lose your job and have worked for 5 years you'll get up to €450 a week under new rules
13 hrs ago
35.2k
72
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say