Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
KIEV AND PRO-RUSSIAN rebels have signed off on a roadmap to implement a Ukraine peace deal thrashed out during marathon talks in Minsk, President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian leader Petro Poroshenko said today.
“The contact group signed a document that we prepared with a great deal of tension,” Poroshenko said of the deal, which Putin said was “a set of measures to implement the Minsk agreements”, referring to a widely disregarded September peace deal.
Earlier Poroshenko, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, France’s Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel had been locked in talks at the presidential palace in Minsk since late last night, trying to work out a plan to end a conflict that has pitted pro-Russian rebels against Kiev government forces in east Ukraine, killing at least 5,300 people and plunging East-West relations to a post Cold War low.
Arch-foes Poroshenko and Putin were meeting for the first time since October at the climax of a frantic European diplomatic drive aimed at stopping the worst East-West crisis since the end of the Cold War from escalating.
Difficult birth
Western European leaders have voiced cautious optimism about the plan, which has been hailed as a great victory by pro-Russian rebels but met with scepticism by war-weary civilians.
Advertisement
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who was a driving force behind the negotiations, along with French President Francois Hollande, said she had “no illusions” and that “big hurdles” remained in ending the 10-month conflict.
“We now have a glimmer of hope,” she said in the Belarussian capital,adding that “concrete steps must of course be taken and there will still be big hurdles ahead”.
“I have no illusions, we have no illusions,” she said, “much work” remained.
Hollande said the deal included a “comprehensive political solution” and provided “serious hope, even if all is not done”.
Merkel’s Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said it represented neither “a comprehensive solution” nor a “breakthrough”.
He said he welcomed the truce plan but “without any exuberance” since “it was a difficult birth”.
Putin, accused of backing the rebels, joked with journalists about whether they had slept or not after the marathon overnight talks.
“It wasn’t the best night of my life but the morning, in my opinion, is a good one because despite all the complexities of the negotiating process we still manged to agree on the main points,” he said.
Why is Putin setting conditions if there are no Russian soldiers in East Ukraine like Putin says?
Or is he just there out of the goodness of his heart to ensure the safe return of thousands of “concerned holidaymakers” armed with the latest Russian weaponry and yet more of his troops who keep turning off their GPS gear, then wandering over the border and getting lost by mistake?
Perhaps you should ask the Ukrainian government that refuses to negotiate with “terrorists”. The talks invoke Germany, France, Russia and Ukraine. Any agreement will be submitted to all parties, including the volunteer batallions run by Oligarchs who don’t come under Kiev command. Perhaps if you tried to keep up with the facts on the ground you wouldn’t get left behind.
The facts:
- Putin rejects Ukraine’s right to decide its own “self-interest”, but insists on that for himself.
- Putin is the ONLY leader to use military force to invade & make a land-grab from a European neighbour since 1968.
Bill, do you follow the Kremlin line that the liberal, democratically elected president and parliament of independent Ukraine should move the eastern and southern borders of their country away from Putin’s troops?
Robin, Hitler was elected in Germany in 1933 in chillingly similar circumstances to Poreshenko by banning communists and basically any other serious opponents what a pity there were no internal rebels to oppose him how different world history would have been if there had been.
Bill one could say the same of Putin. Well almost, democracy had little to do with Putin’s last election win, like when you see video of election officials stuffing ballot boxes with votes for Putin. Democracy Russian style where your vote magically changes to support Putin or who or what Putin wants and the dead rise and vote.
Bill. You Will find Porochenko was elected in a free, fair and open manner. Where no electoral irregularities were reported by international observers. Can you say the same about Putin’s election?
Gerard. I have see the Putinistas on here use Godwins Law more times when trying to deflect from Russia’s annexation of Crimea when it was compared to German annexation of the Sudatenland.
And Gerard what of all those that have accused others of using Godwin’s Law when it was pointed out to them that Russia’s annexation of Crimea is strikingly similar to Nazi Germany’s annexation of the Sudetenland in 38 have they lost their credibility too?
‘The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives’, Written by Zbigniew Brzezinski – Former US national security advisor.. A recommended read if you want get to grips with the US’ (and by proxy, ‘The West’) aggressive policy towards Russia and the east Ukrainians.. cynical stuff, but if your empire is on the decline then needs must..
Selected quotes:
“Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power.”- (p. xiii)
“It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.” (p. xiv)
“How America ‘manages’ Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world’s three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa’s subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world’s central continent. About 75 per cent of the world’s people live in Eurasia, and most of the world’s physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world’s known energy resources.” (p.31)
“In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last.” (p.209)
“Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” (p. 211)
More anti-American fodder, The demise of America has been predicted decade after decade but its not getting any closer. It still has the strongest military by far, it still has the richest economy and the majority of the richest companies in the world. It’s national debt is manageable and for the most part owed to American’s themselves, its currency is still the strongest, the PetroDollar is secure and so many nations including Russia’s neighbors seek to align themselves in Western military organizations.
The chances of this one holding are slim without an international force wedged between the rebels and the government forces. The last deal broke down because both sides took pot shots at one another and it continually escalated until open fighting broke out.
Compare it to Israel and Syria where international troops, while not being 100% effective at stopping pot shots, have certainly done a good job at preventing conflict there from escalating.
@ B-Egan : You said it. “ Without outside interference”. The biggest problem at the moment is that, as the extremely destructive wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya near an end ,and the US total destruction of Syria has been disrupted for the time been, the military industrial complex desperately needs a new confrontation, somewhere, anywhere. Europe and Russia do not.
Global Hegemony in the Guise of “Collective Defense” against Russia. Moscow’s Response?
Since World War II, the United States has invaded, bombed, and/or occupied the Korean Peninsula, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Somalia, Lebanon, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria. Some of these nations have been attacked by the US more than once. In many more countries the US has facilitated the violent overthrow of various governments, particularly in South America and the Middle East, first through the use of its Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), then through more veiled organizations like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). It has troops stationed in over a hundred nations around the world, occupying hundreds of military installations. http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-hegemony-in-the-guise-of-collective-defense-against-russia-moscows-response/5430554
“Since World War II, the United States has invaded, bombed, and/or occupied the Korean Peninsula, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Somalia, Lebanon, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria.”
Russia forcibly occupied Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, the Ukraine and Uzbekistan while maintaining East Germany, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Romania as puppet states.
Of these, a vast number were invaded during their tenure as puppets or “member states” while many have suffered invasions by Russia in the post-Soviet world. This is before we even touch on their involvement in Afghanistan, Korea, China and Vietnam to name but a few.
I’m tired of all this “look at how many countries the US has invaded” whataboutery when discussing issues that other countries, namely Russia, have caused.
In Iraq , Afghanistan and Libya, killing over a million people and displacing many millions more. In Vietnam many millions killed and up to the present day as in Laos, and Cambodia thousands of children been born with physical and mental defects as a result of agent orange. Same problems in Iraq and Libya through the illegal use of depleted uranium. This all in the name of democracy which does not exist in the US . any more and which is today an Oligarchy heading fast track towards fascism , unfortunately. It is high time that the US began to look after their own badly neglected citizens and their own so called Democracy once again. http://www.policymic.com/articles/87719/princeton-concludes-what-kind-of-government-america-really-has-and-it-s-not-a-democracy
“In Iraq , Afghanistan and Libya, killing over a million people and displacing many millions more. ”
Proof? The only accepted figures for Iraq put the total death toll, including civilians, soldiers and insurgents, at no more than 150,000. Over a war that spanned 10 years that’s a remarkably low number.
“Same problems in Iraq and Libya through the illegal use of depleted uranium.”
Please do show where Depleted Uranium is listed as a banned weapon. The same BS claims were made about cluster munitions yesterday here. People seem to think any weapon used by the US is illegal (oh, you’ll be happy to know that Russia heavily uses DU munitions as well).
Also tests were conducted using titanium replacements for DU munitions and it was found that they are much worse for the environment and health of someone surviving an impact.
Jason you know Pat and the other Putinistas are going to try and spin numbers from fresh air to back up any claim they make. They are only following the Moscow hand book.
I fully agree with you Jay, both Russia and the US have a dirty history of getting involved where they really shouldn’t have. I just see comments here entirely focusing on the US (even though Russia is the one with boots on the ground and are actively arming a belligerent) and feel compelled to at least try to add some balance to the comments section.
That, apparently, makes me a “shill” according to some or that I get all my news from “Fox” according to others, even though I’ve never even seen that channel once in my life.
Jason. Its the same rhetoric over and over again. If you are anti Putin you watch Fox News, are a Shill etc, the Government in Kiev are all Nazis and there are no Russian soldiers, Arms or Equipment in Eastern Ukraine.
I think they are hoping that if they say it enough times people may start to believe it.
The British polling firm Opinion Research Business (ORB) asked 1,720 Iraqi adults last summer if they had lost family members by violence since 2003; 16% had lost one, and 5% two. Using the 2005 census total of 4,050,597 households in Iraq, this suggests 1,220,580 deaths since the invasion. Accounting for a standard margin of error, ORB says, “We believe the range is a minimum of 733,158 to a maximum of 1,446,063.”
Not to mention the thousands, perhaps millions that the Russians have spirited away to Siberia on trumped up charges many of whom have never been heard of again.
Pat, those results have been criticised by researchers because of the fact that they merely address deaths caused by violence and were not focused solely on casualties caused by the war and insurgency. Not to mention 730,000 to 1.4 million is a massive margin of error and smacks of a poorly-organised research project.
The classified Iraqi War Logs, the Iraq Body Count Project, the Iraqi Health Ministry investigation and the Associated Press investigations all put the number in a 100-170,000 range and the Iraq War Logs include Coalition casualties in that figure.
@ Chris Kirk : I presume you mean the Soviets. Yes that was terrible, but now we are just referring to the period following WW2 where we had hoped mankind had learned something from this terrible historical disaster. Here I am not speaking about the Soviets, the Germans or about Genghis Kahn for that matter.
@business cat. Very strange that the separatists have not been given a seat at the table. This concerns mainly the people from E Ukraine, yet their voice cannot be heard.
@Jason. According to Russian language media (slon.ru), the leaders of donetsk and lugansk people’s republics are somewhat put out that they have had no say. They have referred to the deal as having been drawn up by the ‘Normandy 4′ (нормандская четвёрка).
In fairness Anne, the vast majority (read: all but one) of the leaders of the pro-Russian rebels are actually Russian citizens with past ties to either the Russian military or secret services. Russia deciding a course of action for what basically is a Russian-led uprising shouldn’t surprise anyone.
@Mick. As far as I know, they have accepted it. My comment was in response to Jason’s suggestion that they didn’t need representation as Putin was there for them. Just pointing out that the separatist leaders didn’t see it that way. When an agreement is drawn up without the main players present, it could be dubious. But let’s hope it stays in place. Too many lives have been lost and the potential for an even greater tragedy was real.
Anne to quote you “they are somewhat put out that they had no say” and “referred to the deal as being drawn up by the Normandy Four”.
Now that begs the question. Does it give Moscow a free pass if fighting flares up? Will Moscow say “look we tried. But because we (Russia) have no Troops on the ground there to monitor the ceasefire there is little we can do. But if can put offical “Peacekeeping Troops” there we can monitor what is happening”.
And just like they did in Georgia and in Moldova they will then claim that their “Peacekeeping Troops” were fired on by the Ukrainian side and as such must defend themselves and the civilian population of Donetsk and Lughansk. Therefore effectively Offically seizing that territory just like they did in Crimea.
Business CIts because the Kiev mob refuses to talk to the rebels. The only reason Kiev is at the table is that 8,000 of its soldiers are surrounded and will be wiped out if they can’t stop the fighting long enough to save them, the war will resume shortly.
Russia can recognise the two states in Novorussia any time it choses, someone is already stopping the worst excesses of the kiev mob, so we have a head start on the peace keeping already.
Just a couple of things Gerard.
You said. “so we have a head start”. Who is “We”. Are you Russian now? Have you something to tell us ?
And how if as Putin claims there are NO Russian soldiers in Eastern Ukraine can “We” have a head start on peace keeping?”
And finally what good is Russia recognizing Donetsk and Lughansk when no one else will? As far as the rest of the world is concerned Crimea and Donetsk and Lughansk are sovereign Ukrainian territory.
so many people willing to come out and say “this is what is happening this is what is not happening” we know next to nothing on this subject people, our information comes from flimsy biased news reports and articles full of spin and righteousness, none of us are on the ground, so none of us know the full story. none of us are willing to admit that though…
Ginger. Oleg a regular contributor on this subject is Ukrainian and knows exactly what is happening in Eastern Ukraine. Yet the pro Russians on here consistently try and shout him down. All one as to do is look at the sheer amount of newly formed Twitter accounts making pro Putin/Russian statements.
He is currently in Ireland but is in regular contact with his family in Ukraine. As would any Irish person living abroad would be if a similar circumstance were happening here.
hey mick I put this in the wrong place earlier
and saying he knows exactly what is happening is a gross-oversimplification , he is not an all seeing god, one person cannot accurately convey the opinions of thousands
I know it may seem crude but I include his family in that, one family is not every family they could be from kiev for all we know, im not saying he is wrong or right, im just trying to make a point that we are for the most part blind on this issue and the smoke being thrown up from both sides doesn’t help
Mick Oleg is 1 ukrainian ( clearly a western ukrainian headbanger) . I have told you time and time again the information I get ftom my relatives in East Ukraine and Crimea via Skype and you dismiss it.
I am in regular contact with my family in Ukraine and Crimea and I can say with certainty that the Kiev government is indiscriminately shelling its own population and blaming the Rebels.
Of course, two people claiming to have two completely lives in two completely different countries with easily accessible and verifiable details about personal lives are the same person. You caught out one of the most elaborate hoaxes going on the internet…
Mick’s got a good point, you’ve yet to prove it despite claiming this BS multiple times. We’ve even got a completely different style of typing.
Mick, you make the case about “newly formed Twitter accounts”? I wonder how true that is? What does it say about the journal allowing so many dubious individuals post on here? Does it not make the journal complicit in allowing one sided Propoganda flourish?
I myself cannot comment under my Facebook profile name which is real. I suspect glen, frank or Horgay have gotten me banned. I have emailed the journal but have not gotten a response. Frank has accused me of “slanderous lies” when he himself makes the most ridiculous comments.
But we know who you are. You have never tried to hide your identity. And their in lays the difference. As for your other account being banned my money would be on Horgay. He had a special hatred for you.
Kieran. According to Anne’s reading of the terrorists statements they feel that as they were not consulted they are not going to implement the ceasefire terms. So if it breaks down you should look East.
Mick
I remember last summer you refused to believe the Uki army was surrounded and getting an ass kicking until the west media had to print the truth. There are about 8,000 Ukrainians surrounded, as soon as kiev secures their escape it will do what it always does, resume the war.
Bet the mad USUK axis of evill are enraged that there is a prospect of peace, insane Mccain and his other evil henchmen will be looking for a way to scupper the peace like they usually do
Why would they be “enraged” when Russia single-handedly did more to drive the Ukraine into the arms of the West than the UK or US could ever hope to achieve themselves?
Will have to wait and see if the “Ukraine president / Gov” follows the agreement, they do not have a good record of moral action, legitimacy or trustworthiness.
Should any real election happen across the entire Ukraine, the likelihood of them remaining in power after setting the military on their own citizens must be close to zero.
That will never happen, the result of their power grab, sham elections and brutal tactics have split Ukraine irreversibly. The entire sequence of events from the first violent demonstrations in Kiev have been a disgrace, and contrary to all values expressed by the EU and the US. Flying in the face of democracy, human rights, and common sense.
Tracking, that comment was straight out of the Kremlin handbook. The same tired old soundbites, the same lack of proof to actually back any of it up. Unlike the referendums in Crimea and the Eastern Oblasts, both the presidential and parliamentary elections were observed and given the seal of approval.
Jason, it is noticeably the case that anyone who doesn’t agree with your Fox news view of the world must be a commenting from a Kremlin handbook. Can you not see how pathetic you are when you come out with the same tired old rubbish?
I hope your heroes in junta give peace a chance or is that possible when they are a law unto themselves
Just indépendant thought Jason, and looking at the facts.
Your comments are out of the Fox News handbook.
It is a geopolitical situation, and I do not trust either side entirely, Russia or the US / EU. Each is trying to install their own puppets in power. The poor Ukrainians are the victims.
The Western “terrorists” seized gov building, had violent demonstrations, shot at the president.
The Eastern “terrorist” seized building in response, and got attacked by the army, burnt alive, and murdered. The result, split Ukraine and civil war, obvious to anyone objectively looking at the situation.
I can understand anyone in the east being enraged by the power grab in Kiev, also russia too.
Yes the elections were given the seal of approval by the US / EU, with their own agenda. Not by Russia, not by the east – Ukraine citizens who had their elected representavie illegally replaced. And did not vote in your “parliamentary elections”.
Due to this you cannot claim the Kiev regime represent the entire Ukraine, or anyone else with credibility.
I hope the result is effective independence of the east within Ukraine, with veto powers of foreign policy, as both points of view within Ukraine exist, and deserve equal share.
Kool. You are the one that described Putin as “The Great Leader” yesterday. Notice you didn’t call him “A” great leader but “The” great leader. And you are the one with a Twitter account set up to specifically to spew Kremlin Propaganda on the Journal.
Sometimes the consequences of doing nothing result in a greater lost of life . The world did nothing in Rwanda and a million people died . After the genocide the world wanted to know why it was aloud to happen . Your damn if you do and your damn if you don’t .
Mick, I didn’t realise it’s a crime to describe someone as a great leader, and so what if that’s how I think about the Russian President. In comparison to what we have in the so called West as leaders then you can’t really disagree.
I guess you like Jason think anyone who doesn’t follow the Fox news narrative must be a kremlin propagandist with fake twitter etc etc
“Yes the elections were given the seal of approval by the US / EU, with their own agenda. Not by Russia, not by the east – Ukraine citizens who had their elected representavie illegally replaced. And did not vote in your “parliamentary elections”.”
“the election is valid in spite of the rather harsh and dirty election campaign” – Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin.
You’re really not good at this whole fact checking thing are you?
Stop playing silly word games, you know well that a coup regime can’t hold a legal election, the fools that observed and gave it their seal of approval criminalised themselves.
“Stop playing silly word games, you know well that a coup regime can’t hold a legal election, the fools that observed and gave it their seal of approval criminalised themselves.”
Are you calling the Russian Minister for Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov and his colleague Grigory Karasin criminals? Both of them have publicly recognised the presidential and parliamentary elections held in the Ukraine after Maidan as legal and fair.
HGT, you could be right that all-Ukraine elections may not take place – possibly rightly so if alternative full independently verified democratic elections are allowed to take place in East Ukraine and Crimea to indisputably establish the views of the people there – but you’re living on a different planet if you think the current Kiev government wouldn’t get an overall majority in Ukraine.
Ouch Gerard you got owned on that one. You and the boys ate not on your A Game this evening. The Ministery of Propaganda (sorry slip of the finger) meant Information won’t be best pleased with you all.
Duh ! Obviously not Jason, Russia can at any time recognise the east as sovereign, that the worst thing about a coup regime, they need at least a generation to establish themselves. Your playing word games again, Russia does not recognise Crimea as part of Ukraine, the Russians played a better game, the key is that they that Kiev is a coup junta, in that situation anything can be said and not done.
They prefer a whole Ukraine, and that is all they will settle for.
You said explicitly that anyone who recognised the parliamentary and presidential elections as legitimate was a criminal. Now anyone except a Russian who recognises it is a criminal?
I very rarely say this on the Journal but I’ll make an exception for you. You are really full of s**t.
Poor little Hunter Biden will be demanding his war mongering Daddy Joe makes sure this peace doesn’t last otherwise Hunter will be losing valuable resources his gas company were depending on to enrich him and his cronies.
Watch out for false flag ops and CIA meddling. Suppose Jon Brennan will be making a trip to Kiev sometime soon.
Neville Chamberlain tried appeasement policies with Germany and that lead to WW2 now Germany think that this policy will have a different outcome with Russia today… And France was there to formally surrender to anyone and everyone. But seriously, didn’t a very smart man once say that “the definition of madness is to keep doing the same thing again and again and expect a different outcome” history is laughing as Angela and she’s not listening as usual. Terrifying stuff… History has shown us how this will all end.
Where’s Frank with his numerology chrystal balls? Did’nt he post on another comments page that something big globally was due on Feb 15th? We wait with bated breath!!!
and saying he knows exactly what is happening is a gross-oversimplification , he is not an all seeing god, one person cannot accurately convey the opinions of thousands
I don’t even know who anne is man im just saying its crazy for us to act as though we understand the situation 100% and that we can judge accurately the best way forward
There are some things we can figure out though from the information that’s trickling through. Research from the Second World War showed that captured equipment (tanks, artillery,vehicles) which was not sent back to be analysed and were instead used on the front had an expected lifespan of a week. This was because the lack of fuel, ammunition and spares would cripple the ability of a nation to use them for any extended period of time.
The rebel forces, on the other hand, seem to have no issue with this. We see videos of them using tanks, heavy artillery and other military vehicles yet these issues seem to be non-existent. As they would need a complex logistical chain behind them supplying all of this gear to keep a protracted civil war going, we can safely assume that Russia is supplying the rebels with the necessary fuel, spare parts and ammunition.
Russia completely denies that this is the case, though, despite the obvious issues with this statement.
Ginger. What do we know for certain. Well lets look.
Russia is currently occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory ie: Crimea.
The terrorists in Eastern Ukraine are getting Arms and Ammo from somewhere. (I don’t believe in fairy god mothers or magic arms shops). The terrorists leaders are mostly Russian citizens with a high level of military and intelligence training.
The civilian population in the terrorist occupied areas have been refused their democratic right to vote in both the Presidential and Parliamentary elections. And the results of the so called referendum that the terrorists held were decided before a single vote was cast. (From the intercepted phone call several days before the ballot. And the ballot results matching perfectly the percentage number mentioned in the call).
The trouble in the East only began “After” Russia had fully occupied Crimea.
We also know the both the Ukrainian President and Parliament were democratically elected in a fair, free and open election. And are politically Centrist but yet continued to be refered to by the Kremlin controlled media as “Nazis”.
Crimea was an autonomous state within Ukraine populated mainly by Russians with dual citizenship. They asked Russia for protection when the maidan right wing vigilantes began sending what they called ‘ peace trains’ to Crimea which were essentially trains full of far right thugs. They wanted to spread the revolution to Crimea where no one wanted them. They asked Russia for help and after that took the next logical step of a referendum to rejoin Russia and escape the ant Russian rioters that were burning police and causing widespread chaos.
Crimea is the most peaceful and safest place in the region now. You think the Crimeans want to return to Kiev control after what they did to the East ukranian Russian civilians?
Mick, I wouldn’t get too worried about them spewing inaccuracies. Tracking and Gerard can’t get over the fact that Russia gave the elections in the Ukraine their seal of approval and some are still denying that the Ukraine was ever invaded in the first place.
Facts come second to worshiping the great Tsar Putin
@Isaac They, (Crimeans), also yearned for the Ukrainian pension and welfare rates to be replaced by the Russian pension -welfare rates that are 2 to 3 times that of the Ukrainian rates.
This may turn out to be a losing bet as the collapse of the price of oil and sanctions,etc., may eventually boomerang on them.
The Ukraine army has been , from the start handing over its equipment and ammo to the ” rebels “, most equipment was stored in the east, obviously, it is coup junta that is running out of arms and ammo, NATO artillery shells turning up in the east, the Poles and others still use Soviet artillery.
Time is running out for the junta, and the army is not behind them.
Gerard. Have you considered stand up comedy. Because that gave a great laugh this morning.
The Ukrainian army are supplying weapons and ammo to the terrorists so they can kill the Ukrainian army with them. Priceless.
I can see the reaction in Moscow now. “He wrote what!!!!!!!!!”
This is what happens when people who have absolutely no idea how supplying an army works comment on how an army is supplied. Even if a majority of the equipment owned by the Ukrainian Army fell into the hands of the rebels, that doesn’t change the fact that a lack of spare parts and ammunition would render them useless within a week.
Where are the rebels getting their guns? Where do the spares come from? Where does the fuel come from? Magical fuel, spares and ammo fairy’s?
Jason. According to Gerard the UA are supplying the Russian army/terrorists with weapons and ammo so they can then use those weapons and armour to fight the UA.
I have heard some great ones coming from the Russian propaganda system but that beats everything hands down so far.
Mick J
Yes Mick, you are a very simple minded fellow, you believe everything the press tell you to, the Ukraine army does not support the coup regime, many thousands have crossed the border into Russia when they got the chance, they gave their weapons to the rebels.
The reason the army is not doing well is that they don’t want to.
Great article! I wish the tension in Ukraine will be fixed soon. I am learning ukrainian through skype at http://preply.com/en/ukrainian-by-skype to visit Ukraine soon and make a documentary about this.
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
1 hr ago
12.6k
Áras An Uachtaráin
134 members of the Oireachtas say they will not nominate McGregor for the presidency
14 hrs ago
37.7k
137
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say