We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
BRITAIN’S DECISION TO vote to leave the European Union has led to much speculation about what lies ahead for the UK, Europe and Ireland.
Both before and after the referendum, politicians from various countries all seemed sure of one thing: they didn’t want a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic to return.
Overall, 51.9% of voters (17.4 million) in the UK wanted to leave the EU, while 48.1% (16.1 million) wanted to remain.
In Northern Ireland, 55.8% of voters (440,000) wanted to remain, while 44.2% (349,000) voted to leave.
A rather decisive 62% of people who voted in Scotland (1.6 million) wanted to remain, while 38% (just over one million) wanted to leave.
A second Scottish independence referendum is likely to be held at some point, but could be years down the line.
A border poll in the North is also not likely to take place for some time. Obviously, one of Sinn Féin’s main goals is a united Ireland and they want to see a vote sooner rather than later.
However, others who want the north and south reunified believe it’s too soon to hold a vote and doing so now would ultimately see it fail. Some people also fear a border poll would reignite sectarian tensions and could lead to violence.
Good Friday Agreement
The Good Friday Agreement (GFA) recognises that Northern Ireland remains part of the UK due to the consent of the people living there.
However, it also provides for the people of the island of Ireland to exercise their right of self-determination by agreement between the people of North and South.
The GFA states:
It is for the people of Ireland alone, by agreement between the two parts respectively and without external impediment, to exercise their right of self-determination on the basis of consent, freely and concurrently given, North and South, to bring about a United Ireland, accepting that this right must be achieved and exercised with and subject to the agreement and consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland.
If such a vote passed, the process of Irish unification would begin.
In recent weeks, we’ve asked all 158 TDs the following two questions:
1. Do you want to see a border poll in Northern Ireland during this government’s term?
2. If such a vote was passed, would you support reunification if a vote was held in the Republic of Ireland?
The GFA was agreed by politicians on 10 April 1998 following intense negotiations aimed at leading to lasting peace and the decommissioning of weapons by paramilitary groups. It was overwhelmingly approved in two referendums in the North and the Republic the following May, coming into effect in 1999.
The agreement put in place a framework to establish a number of political institutions representing the relationships that exist within and between the islands of Britain and Ireland: the Northern Ireland Assembly, the North South Ministerial Council and the British-Irish Council.
The GFA notes that the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland could put legislation allowing for a united Ireland before the UK Parliament if citizens in the North voted for this in a referendum. It states:
If the wish expressed by a majority in such a poll is that Northern Ireland should cease to be part of the United Kingdom and form part of a united Ireland, the Secretary of State shall lay before Parliament such proposals to give effect to that wish as may be agreed between Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom and the Government of Ireland.
There appears to be a greater desire for a border poll among people in the Republic, compared to people in Northern Ireland.
In July, one month after the Brexit vote, a Paddy Power/Red C Research poll for the Sunday Times found that 65% of people in the Republic said they would vote in favour of a united Ireland.
An opinion poll carried out this week by Amárach Research for Claire Byrne Live asked people in the Republic ‘Is it time to have a United Ireland?’ Just under half (46%) said yes, 32% said no and 22% were unsure. The highest percentage of people in favour of a united Ireland were those in the 25-34 age group, with 54% saying yes.
However, an opinion poll carried out in the North by Ipsos Mori in August and September on behalf of BBC programme The View found that just 22% of people there would support a united Ireland, with 63% wanting to remain in the UK.
More than four in 10 people with a Catholic background who were polled (43%) wanted a united Ireland, while the vast majority of people (88%) from a Protestants background would vote to stay in Britain.
More than eight in 10 respondents (83%) said the UK’s decision to leave the EU hadn’t changed the way they would vote in a border poll.
So, where do Ireland’s political parties and TDs stand on the issue?
Overall, 74 TDs (47%) sent us statements. You can read all of the individual replies here.
Of this, 38 TDs (including 23 from Sinn Féin) want to see a border poll within the lifetime of this government, 33 do not and three are listed as ‘other’ because they did not directly answer the question.
If a border poll was passed in the North, 59 TDs who replied said they would support a similar vote here, three would not and 11 didn’t directly answer the question.
Just 13 of the 50 Fine Gael TDs answered, with six – including Taoiseach Enda Kenny and Foreign Affairs Minister Charlie Flanagan – believing the time is not right for a border poll. However, most said they would support a similar vote in the South if such a referendum passed in the North.
Half of Fianna Fáil TDs – 22 out of 44 – replied to the survey. Of this, the majority believed holding a border poll during the lifetime of this government would be premature. However, many expressed a desire for a united Ireland at some point in the future.
All Sinn Féin TDs, so 23 overall, replied. Unsurprisingly, all are in favour of a border poll and want a united Ireland. All 158 TDs were contacted on several occasions, via phone and email.
Here’s what the main parties and/or leaders think:
Note: All responses are included in full at the request of some ministers and TDs, given the nuances of the topic being discussed.
Fine Gael
A spokesperson said: “Fine Gael supports the Government position that there is no demand for a border poll at this time, as there is no evidence to show a majority of people want to join the Republic.”
Taoiseach Enda Kenny added: ”We have made it perfectly clear that the question of a united Ireland is contained in the Good Friday Agreement, which I support fully, and of which I, as Head of Government, am a co-guarantor with the British Government.
“The Good Friday Agreement and its successor agreements contain a very clear measure to the effect that if people north and south of the Border decide by referendum that there should be a united Ireland, they should have that opportunity. We support this measure. This measure must be part of a continued guarantee of the negotiations that will take place between the European Union and on our future relationship with the United Kingdom.
Does this mean that a Border poll is imminent? No, it does not. Does it mean that the Government is calling for a Border poll now? No, it does not. Does it mean that the Government is looking at the longer term as to what the people in Northern Ireland and the Republic might do in accordance with the Good Friday Agreement? We will guarantee that right and opportunity is protected in the language of the future negotiations. This is an international, legally-binding agreement of which the Republic is co-guarantor and it will be followed through on fully. That time is not now.
Tánaiste Frances Fitzgerald sent us this statement: “As co-guarantor of the Good Friday Agreement, the Government is committed fully to supporting its provisions. That Agreement addresses the question of a united Ireland. The Tánaiste fully supports the provisions of the Good Friday Agreement and its successor Agreements in this regard.
“If, in the future, the people North and South decide by referendum that there should be a united Ireland then that opportunity should be available to them.
The Government will continue to work to ensure that there is full protection for the provisions of the Good Friday Agreement, which is a binding, international agreement, in the context of the forthcoming negotiations between the EU and the UK on the future relationship.
Foreign Affairs Minister Charlie Flanagan and Social Protection Minister Leo Varadkar also don’t think the time is right for a border poll, saying it could lead to increased division in the North.
However, Varadkar said he believes there will be a united Ireland in his lifetime.
“I know that now this is not the time for a border poll. It would be unsuccessful and divisive and could undermine relations between the two communities in the north. We need to achieve a unity of purpose first of all,” he told us.
Fianna Fáil
Micheál Martin said: “Fianna Fáil is absolutely committed to the reunification of Ireland and has been since its foundation. While in Government we were central to the Good Friday Negotiations, in which we negotiated and agreed the mechanism for a border poll.
However, the holding of such a border poll is the end point of a process, where a majority of people in the North have been convinced on the case for withdrawing from the UK. There is no evidence that this shift in public opinion has taken place and indeed the manner in which this immediate border poll has been suggested is likely to have further damaged the prospects of success of any such poll.
“What Fianna Fáil is doing, and what all political parties should be doing now, is to recognise the immense challenge presented by Brexit and work hard at home and abroad to help mitigate the worst impacts of this decision for Northern Ireland.
“It is through such constructive activity, rather than through unilateral demands for border polls, that we can begin to convince neighbours from the unionist community that their best interests are served in an all-Ireland context.”
Sinn Féin
Gerry Adams said: ”I firmly believe that building a united Ireland is in the interests of every Irish citizen, North and South, and offers the most sensible, prudent path to ensuring long-term prosperity, progress and equality for everyone on the island.
“We need to be planning for the future, not sustaining the mistakes of the past and partition, which has held back the economic and social potential of the country since the island was artificially divided.
“At present there are two states on this island, North and South, and three governments in Dublin, Belfast and London trying to run them. None of them can adequately prioritise the interests of all our citizens. For that, we need one integrated vision for the island.
We would be better served by a united Ireland that delivers real democracy, by economies of scale in infrastructural development, by the elimination of service duplication in areas like health and education, and by the economic benefits that would ensue.
“Recent research (Hubner and Van Nieuwkoop, 2015*) shows that Irish unity would result in significant long-term improvements in Ireland’s economy – concluding that Irish unity would result in a €35.6 billion boost during the first eight years of unification.
“Any neutral observer would easily come to the conclusion that there are no advantages for a small island nation, with 6.4 million inhabitants, on the edge of Europe having separate tax regimes and legal systems, competing economic development programmes, and back-to-back health and education systems.”
*The research, carried out by a consulting firm in Vancouver, British Columbia, is based on the models of unification seen in Germany in the late 20th century and post-partition Korea. Three unification scenarios were presented, with the most aggressive estimating a €35.6 billion boost in an all-island GDP in the first eight years of unification.
Labour
Brendan Howlin told us: ”It is the view of the Labour Party that reunification of the island of Ireland must be our ambition, but we recognise the principle of consent that underpins the ongoing peaceful settlement in Northern Ireland.
Under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland is empowered to determine the date on which a referendum on reunification of the island may take place, but only in circumstances where it appears that a majority are likely to favour such an outcome. We do not believe that is likely to be the case during the lifetime of this government.
“We support the reunification of the island of Ireland. In the unlikely event that a referendum is held in Northern Ireland, and that the people of the North vote for reunification, the Labour Party would campaign in support of this proposal in the Republic.”
Anti-Austerity Alliance
The AAA sent us this statement: “The Anti-Austerity Alliance TDs – Ruth Coppinger, Paul Murphy and Mick Barry – are opposed to the calls for a border poll. A border poll would be nothing more than a sectarian headcount and would resolve nothing.
“A binary referendum is not a basis to reconcile the two communities, with their opposing national identities and aspirations. It would serve only to heighten tensions and pit Catholic and Protestant workers and young people against each other. The ‘losing side’ would not stoically accept its fate. Such a poll would only deepen divisions and stoke the flames of sectarian conflict.
The AAA TDs, alongside socialist and trade union activists in the North, would actively campaign for a boycott of this vote. We recognise that a majority of Catholics in the North aspire towards Irish unity, at least at some point in the future, for cultural reasons and because of the history of discrimination and oppression within the Northern state. We also recognise that most Protestants support the maintenance of the Union with GB for cultural reasons and because they fear becoming a vulnerable minority within a capitalist united Ireland, a legitimate concern which was reinforced by the experience of the IRA’s armed campaign.
“These fears and aspirations are continually preyed upon and manipulated by the sectarian parties and paramilitaries in both communities to suit their own narrow interests.
“Neither community has the right to coerce the other into a state they do not want to be part of on the basis of a simple majority vote. The current situation is not a solution but a border poll will not provide a solution either. No solution can be found while forces with a vested interest in maintaining sectarian division – whether the Green and Orange parties or British capitalism – continue to dominate.
“Only by building a new movement which unites Protestant and Catholic workers and youth around their common interests and in opposition to the political establishment can we begin to break down the sectarian barriers between our communities. On this basis, The AAA TDs favour a socialist solution to the national problem on this island where the rights of both Catholics and Protestants are guaranteed.”
The above quotes are based on statements from party leaders and/or when a party or alliance sent a joint statement on behalf of all members.
Who said what
Below is a selection of other people’s views from different parties and none.
Several Fianna Fáil TDs are not in favour of a border poll during the lifetime of this government, but most who replied would back reunification if the North did eventually vote to join the Republic.
Most of the Fianna Fáil TDs who replied sent us the same statement, namely:
We don’t believe a border poll is needed within the lifetime of this government. While Brexit has certainly focused the minds of many people, north and south, on a re-united Ireland, a border poll is not what is needed now. Fianna Fáil’s policy has always been for a reunited Ireland. However, this can only be achieved through consensus and respect for all communities, and traditions, on this island. This process only truly began following the Good Friday Agreement.
Some of the party’s members elaborated on their views, with Timmy Dooley telling us: “I’d love to get to the point where there is a border poll and there’s a chance of it succeeding. At the moment it would be a distraction. A lot of issues need to be addressed because of the Brexit vote. There is no chance of it passing, it would be a sideshow.
“I absolutely want to see a united Ireland, but a border poll in lifetime of this government will not be successful. We should be encouraging people to work together to deal with the fallout of Brexit. When people in the North see the long-term implications of Brexit, there is a much better chance of the majority deciding to move towards a Dublin government.
Five years out, there is real potential of it passing. There will be a economic benefit to the six counties of joining the Republic. Britain will be isolated. It’s clear the union is under threat of break-up, Scotland may vote to become independent.
Sectarian issues
His colleague Jim O’Callaghan had this to say: “Even though I believe partition was a sectarian solution to a political problem, I believe a border poll during this government’s term would be inadvisable. Irish unity will only be achieved when we can bring together the different traditions on this island.
At present, one million unionists in Northern Ireland are opposed to and distrustful of Irish unity. The main reason for their current distrust is the violence in Northern Ireland carried out by the provisional IRA for 25 years. They viewed this as a sectarian campaign against their community. Their distrust of Irish republicanism is similar to the distrust that Republicans have of the British security services who colluded in the killing of many nationalists and republicans. It will take time for the wounds in both communities to heal.
“A border poll in the next year or so will be extremely divisive. It will simply harden opinions and force people into sectarian groupings. It will probably result in sectarian violence. Northern Ireland was established as a sectarian state, with widespread discrimination against Catholics. That has now ended – not because of the IRA’s campaign of violence – but because of the civil rights campaign and the unacceptability of discrimination.
We should not, however, repeat the mistakes of the past and keep viewing the North as an entity made up of two irreconcilable groups. Bonds and bridges between the two communities must be further built. When those bonds are strong, the unionist population will recognise that a new Ireland, encompassing all the people of the island, is a promising and non-threatening prospect. All parties on the island now accept that unity is a decision for the people of Northern Ireland.
“In a less sectarian climate a border poll can occur but politicians have a responsibility to ensure that the current peace is not threatened. A border poll in the next few years would, in my opinion, destabilise the current peace in the North. The recent vote on Brexit in Northern Ireland shows that unionists are prepared to see the benefits of remaining part of a union with the south, rather than a small union with an inward looking and self-interested England. Calls by Sinn Féin for an immediate border poll undermine the significance of this change in unionism. Such tactless calls are counter-productive to securing Irish unity.”
‘Good economically and politically’
Unsurprisingly, all Sinn Féin TDs are in favour of a border poll, something the party has repeatedly called for.
Brian Stanley said: “Due to Brexit if the North is dragged out of the EU by England, then there will be two currencies and two political systems on the island and one part of Ireland in the EU and the other out of it.
The island divided in three different ways such as this will have serious impact socially, economically and politically. Reunification would bring the opposite and more positive effects.
His colleague Carol Nolan stated: “Partition has impacted and stunted development on this island and has been an obstacle in terms of developing agriculture and tourism. It doesn’t make sense to have two legal systems and two currencies on such a small island.”
Peadar Tóibín said he wants the people of the North to be given ”a democratic chance … to indicate their choice”.
He said a united Ireland would “reduce duplication and therefore the cost of key public service delivery” and “reduce the barriers to enterprise on the island”. He added that the border is a “competitive advantage for criminals” and getting rid of it would help prevent smuggling.
John Halligan and Finian McGrath of the Independent Alliance said they would support a border poll during the lifetime of the government, with Halligan stressing the idea needs to be backed by people in the north.
‘A significant risk to the peace process’
The majority of Fine Gael TDs did not reply to the question, but most of those who did don’t think the time is right for a border poll.
Josepha Madigan told us: “There is no evidence that a border poll in Northern Poll would result in a change to the status quo. In fact, the evidence points to the current arrangement, of devolved government based in Stormont, as being the preferred option for most people in Northern Ireland. The peace process, which is hugely important for people living both north and south of the border, is underpinned by the constitutional arrangement established by the Good Friday Agreement.
A border poll could undermine this, likely proving highly divisive and polarising, reigniting old tensions we thought quelled. Without evidence of popular support for unification within Northern Ireland, a border poll would be destabilising and entail a significant risk for the peace process. If evidence of a major change in public opinion in Northern Ireland emerges, I would reconsider this matter. But as things stand, I do not believe that a border poll should be held.
Peter Burke said: “It is too soon and would be extremely politically divisive. At present, there is no evidence of a majority wanting to join the Republic. People have a right to their opinion but discussions of border poll in the short-term future are premature.
“If a poll was to be held, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland must judge it likely that a majority of the electorate would opt for a united Ireland. At present, there is no evidence to suggest that such an outcome would occur. If those resident in the both the North and the South wanted reunification then I would support it.”
‘Psychological borders caused by deep hurt, pain, suffering and loss’
Gino Kenny from People Before Profit (PBP) said: ”I’d like to see a united Ireland. In order for that to happen there has to be a consensus in the six counties.
“A border poll has been mooted many times over the last 20/30 years, a focus is on it against after the Brexit vote. I’m not against it, it depends on how it’s done. It’s about timing, I’m not sure it would pass, probably not based on polls.”
His PBP colleagues also questioned whether or not such a poll would pass. Richard Boyd Barrett said: “We would support a border poll, another question is whether or not it would pass.”
Bríd Smith added:
I think a border poll at this time would be divisive. I don’t think this issue has been properly debated. We have a lot of reform to do before we look attractive to Northern Ireland.
Eamon Ryan said the Green Party “would only like to see a border poll in Northern Ireland when the time is right which is not the case as it currently stands”.
His colleague Catherine Martin added: “One of the outcomes of the Brexit referendum was the immediate call by some for a border poll. Firstly, I should state that I would love to see a united Ireland by peaceful means. I was born and reared in a border town – I know first-hand how destructive and divisive borders can be – we do not want to see the return of physical borders.
“But much more work is needed to remove in many respects an even more important debilitating border, namely the psychological borders caused by deep hurt, pain, suffering and loss which is still extremely palatable and present for many in both communities. So much more work, often low-profile work, must first be done to build up trust and mutual respect.
Surely at this stage, after all that the people, north and south, have been through in the troubles, we should accept the one overriding principle that reconciliation, mutual respect, tolerance, consultation and inclusivity must be front and centre. Reconciliation and ultimately the goal of a united Ireland means bringing people together, all the time building trust not coming up with snap, unilateral proposals which exclude instead of include, and which instil fear instead of instilling much needed trust and confidence.
“It is my opinion that a border poll should not be rushed as that would alienate and would prove divisive running the risk of turning the poll into a sectarian headcount and going on then to proceeding to lose the vote, as inevitably would happen, would be a serious setback for the goal of achieving a united Ireland for a generation.
“Yes, I would like to see a border poll take place some day, but only if it had a realistic chance of being successful and that is not the case at present as the unionist community is to say at the very least certainly not enthused by it – to have a poll knowing in all likelihood that it is going to fail is a retrograde step.”
Four independent TDs replied, with all in favour of a border poll. Mattie McGrath said: “As a political proposition there would appear to be little to fear in subjecting the issue to a democratic vote.
“Consensus is a key principle of the post-Good Friday politics. If the proposition was put in line with the provisions of that agreement then it might provide a measure of clarity that would be helpful in an environment that is increasingly uncertain post-Brexit.”
The Social Democrat and Workers and Unemployed Action Group TDs did not reply to the survey.
With reporting by Ronan Smyth and Christina Finn
The standard of taxi drivers in this country is shocking. Its an occupation filled by people that could not get a job anywhere else and whose only skills are being able to drive (barely) and complain about ‘foreigners’.
Well a friend of mine recently was in Galway with heavy bags, the taxi driver asked her about them as he was loading , when he heard it was a donation for the women’s refuge, he didn’t charge for the journey , a credit to his profession, take a bow sir, he is a Dub, anyone that knows him say well done .
Jesus you are going on like he cured cancer. He helped a person lift their bags into his cab ( this is their job, you are paying them for it) , and he let her off with a few euro.
Whilst I agree with you about the standard it must be said that there is a minority of excellent, non bitter, non disenfranchised, helpful, funny, reliable ones that put up with a lot. One guy was open enough to take me through the business model and how they make money.
Ace by name , Ahole by nature
A Dub that let someone off with a fare!he’ll be easily found Dubs don’t do stuff like that
You still knocking around Alan b ( b for ballbag )
Keith you’re hilarious you’ve been usuing that joke for the last three years
And yet Irish taxi drivers were voted “THIRD BEST” according to a trip advisor survey! Maybe you should look st yourself and how you behave when in a taxi. Or if you don’t use taxis then you have a sad life to be commenting on something of no relevance to you. What about taxi passengers too….vomiting, urinating in cars or constantly looking for discounts?!
You talk utter scutter..i can gurentee ive more brains in the top of my c than you have in your skull.gimp.
@John Rag Scales: Your spelling and grammar tells a different story. Go on out of that.
Yeah and you’re delighted when one of them stops for you at 3 am when you are sloshed and talking bolox to the driver.Its knobends like you that sickens me.
You’re some ass wipe ace.you really are.
Did you tell him how much you make every week Chris? Frankly it’s none of your business mate! Don’t be asking a Taxi driver personal questions about his earnings ok.
Keith Alan b is a big culshie who dislikes dublin people and he has that small town mentality. Down in mucka land they bail into a taxi (6 of them) and throw the driver 2 eu each.the car is covered in muck after them.
I remember a taxi man refusing to bring me to santry from the airport because he’d been waiting in the kesh for two hours and felt he deserved a better fare. I told him I’d throw him €20 even though it was only a short spin but he was having none of it. Reported him to the taxi regulator and got a letter a few weeks later saying they looked into it and weren’t going to do anything about it. I definitely think the numbers referred for any disciplinary action are only low because the regulator doesn’t go after its own members
Craig…taxi drivers are not “members” of the regulators office. Seriously dobsomevlearning before commenting.
Eh….do some learning
Sounds like your all fella learned you to speak proper
Now now Craig,you are being economical with the truth because he will be put off the rank if he refuses. That is a very strict rule at the Airport Another storyteller.!
Afraid not Gerry! I went and complained to the guy on the rank that radios them up. He was great and professional and sent him off to join the queue again. But that still doesn’t change anything about what I said the regulator did. Didn’t mention either that the taxi man that refused me also told me to go up to departures and get one there. That’s a big no-no as well and I stuck that in my complaint. Nothing done about that either!
Funny you didn’t point that out in your first comment isint it Craig. Only that I brought the rules to your attention. Just get the bus in future because it’s YOU who will create a bad vibe every time you get a Taxi in future.ok. Because you are on standby for a confrontation and that’s wrong,so just find some other way to get around. They don’t need people like you getting into their cabs.
Eh….. No. Kinda seems like your the one looking for a fight. Didn’t think anecdotal evidence in the comments section would work anyone up like this! Unless……. Was it you who kicked me out and got kicked off the rank!? Have you been waiting all these years for your revenge??
Eh no Craig! I wouldn’t let you I to my cab in the first place. And I’m not worked up at all. I just cannot stand fools making stupid comments and telling porkies ok.
Look at ya, after all these years and still refusing me. Old habits die hard. Your some man for one man Gerry. Single handedly defending the honor of an entire industry with just the threats you can make in a comments section . A true warrior of the keyboard.
Got into a taxi yesterday in cork.. The smell the dirt of the car interior. . The driver looked like he had never seen soap and water in 12 months. The car clearly was not in roadworthy condition as it rattled over every bump it hit.. I would be embarrassed if it were mine.
Why didn’t you just get out instead of bitching now about it? More bull.
Taxi business is a jungle…welcome to the jungle baby
Don’t worry the digital economy is sending them the way of the dinosaurs, in ten years they won’t exist
Yeah and at 3 in the morning you’ll have to walk home
I’m going make it clear what actually happens based on my experience and I’ll simplify.
I hailo’d and was in a glass lift above him when he arrived I said I’d see him in 30 seconds. Meaning total wait time for him was 30-60. He drives off with other customer as I’m on phone and hangs up. Phone him loads of lies and excuses.
With a complaint you’ve two options. Court for fine or just a simple complaint where it’s on your record. I complained and was pressured not to take it to court by the NTA. Significant noticeable pressure saying there’s no witnesses.
So when you peel it all away the body that protects us is a laughing stock because in a lot of cases they encourage no court saying there is no evidence and thus no fine and thus no accountability and thus they are weak individually at their jobs for having that strategy and accepting it. It became clear that court was a hindrance against them and didn’t want to pursue and instead said “hey look we’ll give out to them internally and keep it in their record”.
Also while on the phone I told them about another guy with his taxi savailability lights on in a taxi queue who wouldn’t take me from o Connell street to Bally bough. He refused.
NTA said look we rang him he said he was in his lunch not much we can do.
Maybe you could not spend the next 15 mins on YouTube and make a rule that if lights on you have to bring a customer and if not taxis will be penalised.
Instead they specifically said. We’re going to do nothing
Chris
So you wanted to take a taxi driver to court because he left with a different passenger. I mean really??
You weren’t robbed,attacked,or run over.
But you wanted to take him to court??
Get a grip.
Chris
You really need to get a life.
Just mutter to youself what a kant, and go about you’re business , not worth the effort pal. Sounds exhausting
Why don’t you just buy your own car and stop moaning. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder over Taxi drivers. Get over it Nancy.
Racism. Disguising how common it is within the taxi community.
Also if you were wondering about the delays in Hailo of late it’s because of the below from a very open frank and honest taxi driver who told me the truth
- taxi drivers declare their income.
- by virtue of working on Hailo it makes their work be transparent and be a true reflection (or at least mostly true if mixed with street work)
- he said underdeclaring was rampant and Hailo doesn’t allow you get away with it thus they are scrutinised with hailo.
- whilst cab drivers are willing to put up with that in the quieter months why would they go on hailo when in December there’s a load of under the counter work everywhere.
- he said though taxi drivers don’t appreciate the full power hailo has given to them. By that he meant, by paying a 20% fee per job he gets an unlimited supply of work. 20 jobs on a Monday in a row in nearly most months i.e. No more driving around searching for work and hoping while petrol is going up.
- also separately at Xmas he said there’s a another antagonising factor. Most months are fine but at Xmas nights supply of taxis falls far short of demand thus incredible delays.
all obvious stuff but Interesting to hear it from horses mouth.
Chris
The above is utter rubbish and simply not true.
A load of bull.
Some horse. Dosent know what he’s talking about. Hailo take 12% not 20%. There is no call out fee and upto 5 mins free waiting time. All in driver can lose 50% on some fares. Supply is not the problem. Traffic delays, customers messing drivers around and 50% loss on jobs are the problems.
There are approx 26,400 licenced taxis in Ireland and the amount of complaints is less than 800???
Its nothing, why make an issue of it.
@Les J Matt: What we do not know is ho many people had a bad experience and did not make a complaint, and who could blame them with the regulator as ineffective as they are.
Ace….the phrase “caveat emptor” comes to mind. There are p%^cks in every industry. A bit of intelligent thinking and balance would go some way to making your comments relevant.
Uber can’t come fast enough to Dublin…
The ones that feel the need to fill every moment with inane opinions on society, politics and racist statements will very soon find themselves out of work.
could someone explain why they switch of their lights when clearly they are looking for fairs, also most dont go to taxi rank especially late in the evening, and up to xamas they where driving up and asking where people where going, maybe they didnt want to go to far as they would lose out on money, all the taxis need to get a grip you work for the public not the other way around!
So who do taxi drivers complain to about the actions of the public?
Orla Ryan,And decent journalist would have also asked the Taxi driver for his views on the abusive behaviour of passengers and the smell off their breaths,either from alcohol or otherwise.their body odour and continuous nattering on wrecking the drivers head.”HEWYA Mr taxidriver”, Are ye busy tonight? Are ye out long? How much would ye earn each night? Can you give me the fare for a tenner instead of 13eu? Would they ask the barman for discount on a pint?I know what they would be told! So Orla,do your your job properly and stop stirring it. I bet you’re real nice to the Taxi driver when he’s bringing you home safe. I think it’s called being two-faced.
Ahh sure there’s no money it anyways
Yeah those making the complaint were too pissed to remember the exact details.
Also typo in post above was meant to read this is a thread about taxis not guards
Not to mention rogue taxi drivers with nothing better to do than to drive up and down Killiney Hill Road and roar abuse at unsuspecting gardeners.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say