Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
The students refused to allow Anthony Lawlor into his own constituency office in Naas as they demand that grants and fees for third-level are left untouched in the budget.
THE LEADER OF the group of students who have occupied the constituency office of a Fine Gael TD in Kildare confronted him as he gave an interview outside his office this afternoon.
The eight students have spent over 24-hours in the constituency office of Anthony Lawlor and have said they have enough supplies to stay there for the next week. They are protesting against possible education cuts and the reintroduction of third-level fees in the budget next week.
The TD said earlier today he is reluctant to involve gardaí in the matter but said he would not be entering into negotiations with the students.
However when giving an interview to Kildare.TV outside his own office this evening, Lawlor was interrupted by the Maynooth Student Union president Rob Munnelly and a debate ensued:
“We are warm, comfortable and well stocked. Heading into day three in the next few hours,” he said. “This is not just a student issue: it’s a family issue, and it’s a national recovery issue.”
Munnelly has said that the group will continue its occupation until the campaign succeeds or “the gardaí drag us out by force”.
The group of eight students says it has come equipped with a chemical toilet and enough food for a week.
It is the latest in a string of occupations by students.
On Wednesday, students from the Free Education for Everyone (FEE) campaign chained themselves to desks in the office of Fine Gael TD Brian Walsh in Galway city. Two students got onto the roof of the building. Nine of the students were later arrested.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Fair play to them, at least someone is standing up to the broken promises that politicians make. Why do Irish people accept constant lies from FF/FG/Labour/Sinn Fein and the rest?
Give sinn fein a chance in power and c if they break there promises, yes Fg,ff and lab have broken theres but don’t put a party who have never being given the chance to prove themselves in the same catagory as the liars we so far have had!!!!!!
If you knew me you would know that I don’t accept lies from anyone!! Do you think there is nobody in the whole of Ireland who is honest and capable of the job? And that we have to accept lies for the rest of our life?
well they did say for years that they would fight on there was a united ireland, would never accept the border, would never sit in stormont etc, the salaries and pensions gets them all in the end
the majority should be listened to, but being in majority doesn’t neccessarily mean being right, there was a time when the majority believed the earth was flat
@Toirealach Mac Fhion.. i’m sure you dont accept lies, knowingly.
i think there are plenty of honest people in the country, but the problem is in order to get into a position to do the job they would have to tell lies in order to convince that their vested interests were going to be served in the process. politics: A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. Marx (Groucho)
That TD is a gobshite.” I’m concerned at the manner by which they entered the office, they opened the door and rushed in”.
As opposed to what? Time machine?
How pathetic. Ye call that a protest? Like fighting with feathers. Seems more like USI leaders doing enough “radical” protest to protect their future career with SIPTU, RTE and Labour.
I think they are right to protest as well Luke, but it should not be just about fees. The standard of third level education has plummeted in the last 20 years and the Dept of Education is a useless unimaginative hospitality unit for useless political appointees who like all other Government Departments squander the public’s money for damn all return.
Protest all you want lads but put some priority on what College should be about in the first place – a proper education without it, at a cost or not, your buggered!
@JohnMurphy
Yeah you’re right. But I couldn’t help laughing at the irony at end of your last sentence. “a proper education without it, at a cost or not, your buggered!”. It’s *you’re not “your”. xD
@john murphy reallocating the education budget from the central government to the students will not increase the budget or the quality of education in the least, if we were talking about student contribution fees on top of the governments money that would possibly be a different story.
In terms of quality, it’s hard to assess anyway. Looking at the league tables of international universities; a determinative factor in ranking is funding itself, meaning a lower budget relative to peers automatically drops you down the rankings which doesn’t really reflect the output of Irish Universities accurately.
I would love to see some Irish centers of excellence like Cambridge, MIT, etc but I think it would be much more beneficial to the entire economy if we could build these on top of a large participation rate instead of some countries such as the US/UK who have very lower penetration of third level education in the population
@Sean
I’m not sure what you mean in the first para about the reallocation of funds. My point, insofar as funding is concerned, is about the miss-appropriation and mismanagement of these funds within the budget of the Dept.
Regarding ‘quality’ all I will add in relation to that is my own observation that the educational standard of graduates that have passed through in the last (at least) 15 years is of a far lower standard as those who graduated in my day almost 30 years ago (Lukes observation on my grammatical error aside!)
Your point in the last para raises an interesting point. Some might think that a ‘large participation rate’ lowers the bar or spreads the butter too thin resulting in a reduction of standard. My feeling is that may well be the case, though it should not be adopted as a policy of ‘improvement’ If it was I would be bringing my flask to my local TD’s office too!
Yes I didn’t phrase my first paragraph very well, what I meant was that introducing student fees and then lowering the amount that the government spends on third level education is going to result in the same amount of money for colleges in the end, so this would not increase funding and therefore increase quality.
I would never advocate lowering entrance numbers (directly or indirectly through extra costs) on the basis that it would be better for those that do get in, third level is there to benefit the individual as much as the economy, and every individual have that opportunity.
I’m really unsure if the calibre of graduate has gone down, but it is so difficult to tell, firstly we have a lot more graduates now which means inevitably there will be more graduates of a lower quality, the type of graduate who would be considered valuable is so different to fifteen years ago (god knows what they would have thought of Iphones in 1996) plus, we’ve fallen down the league tables since 2007 but have our universities gotten that bad that quickly? Really don’t know. I honestly don’t think the system we have is that bad except for lack of certain courses (IT, Maths, advanced business/MBAs etc) and some centers of excellence. I would be worried about taking a step backwards
Thanks Sean,
Got a better idea of where you were going now re. budgets.
Interesting that you mention Iphones though. I recall Google complain about the standard of IT graduates and threaten pull-out if things didn’t improve.
I just think it’s an terrible shame that the protesters don’t include the matter of standards as one of their concerns. It would certainly put a more considered, and broader based case to their campaign.
Needless to say we will need the best educated graduates we can get to help us out of the general mess we’re in, that’s of course if they chose to stay. There we have another real problem!
God love them , there young and idiotic in there methods . They think it’s all a bit of fun and the student union president seems to have no end to his verbal nonsense . The Garda need to step in and regain civil order with all these fools . Protest is a great voice in mass but one or two students acting like children and taking over one or two buildings makes no difference . Next they will pitch tents and join the tree hugging members of society . He’s probably going to leave the country anyway once the tax payer has paid for his education . They should leave the fees as they are but get them to take a loan out for the fees and allow them to pay back the loan from their job and taxes if they stay in this country when they leave . Many countries adopt this system . They have got free education for years and I don’t object as long as it’s good for the country and good for the economy but when we educate people for free and they up and leave they must pay back the tax payer for the education .
How dumb he is and how uneducated he is , when he said he didn’t care if they ended up with criminal records because they were leaving the country anyway . Does the guy not realise if he gets a criminal record for public order , he will never get access to United States , Canada or Australia .
If they do put the fees up , well then protest but why not wait and see what happens on Tuesday first , it all seems a little premature to me and infantile .
I support the students occupying the office, BUT, not allowing the TD enter his own office is unacceptable. He should be allowed into his office, no matter what. They have in essence siezed his office, not just occupied it!
This budget is going to be “die dog or shite a licence” for a lot of students (myself included as a mature student following redundancy). If the grant gets cut as it did last year I don’t think I’ll be able to continue going to college, I’ll have to just go on the dole with little prospects. How will that help the economy. At least while I’m in college, there is a hope of not being on the dole in the near future. There are many others like me. In general if people are going to college, they are less likely to be on the dole, instead they’ll be (hopefully) out earning and paying tax. They may even create employment again generating tax stream. So when people criticise students for protesting, ask what they should be doing? Tying to stay in college, or head off home, sit on their arses and draw the dole.
it’s people such as you that should be suported but this shower are just looking free education for everyone, totally off the wall. It’s just not possible or even desirable as it just generetes a gravy train
Well said Iain, most of these cuts are counter productive. Some students can’t afford to go to college- go on the dole. Increase fuel prices- more fuel laundering. 2% on shopping- more Internet shopping and people going up the north, less tax taken in. Shops close- more people on dole and so on. Do politicians not understand that they are taken money away from the people that pay their wages and pensions? We need to educate our kids if we want a bright future for them.
It these students who are fighting the fight I can tight for myself because I am too afraid. Afraid of being arrested for occupying as I still have a wife and child to support, and I have exams that I can’t afford not to study for. I have one shot at getting a degree and getting a job and whilst I work hard to meet the requirements of the course, these guys are working to make sure I can afford to continue doing it. Fair play to them I say.
Just to add, I don’t think anyone has any gripes that things have to be cut, the grant generally was cut by about 4% last year, that’s fair enough, people can adjust their living costs slightly and struggle on, however my grant as a mature student was cut by 60%. Now fair enough I don’t have to pay fees, the grant covers that, but Christ that was some hit. The sky TV had to go, so did the car, I now walk and bus everywhere as does the wife, i still have internet cos i need it for study, but i haven’t had a pint in 6 months. I think that targeted cut to mature students was draconian and unfair, and that is why I am so completely behind any protest against any further cuts. There’s a difference between living style adjustment and totally removing someone’s standard of living. Santa is going to have a very light bag this year.
While I agree with you Iain to a point but the money has to come from somewhere. I’m a mature student too but because I’m part time I get nothing at all. I have to come up with €2700 for this years course and I get nothing for it. I’ve even laid out a plan to the Welfare crowd and they said no. They want to spend €30k over 2 years keeping me as a FT student as opposed to giving me half the fees and I would come up with the other half. It’s a no brainer but they don’t see it that way. I’m also available to work in the mean time as well so if I did get a job my tax would actually contribute more from my end. It’s just so stupid.
What these students should take into account is that in the UK they would have to fork out about £6000 pa for their course so they really aren’t getting a bad deal here. Most of them unlike yourself are have no dependants so they can afford to carry out these actions. While on one hand I can empathise with their actions on the other hand if they stopped for a moment and looked at what it costs a mature student to educate themselves they might just pack up their gear, go back to their studies and count themselves lucky!
@Brian, we shouldn’t be benchmarking ourselves against the UK on this, they have some of the top Universities in the world for definite, but less than one third of people who applied to third level education in the UK last year actually obtained a position in third level education
It keeps getting worse there because this is obviously a compound problem with people rolling over from one year to the next, and this is all with the fees that you mentioned
It’s fantastic to see young people actually start to take a stand over the education funding issue.
Keep up the good work guys and do not fear the Gards.
Solidarity from Free Education for Everyone Galway.
xXx
Forward the revolution
The number of millionaires in this country steadily rises at a rate of about 10% per year, even still in the last 3 years. There is plenty of wealth in this country, a disproportional amount and it simply needs redistributing for the benefit of the entire country.
wow, people in the UK applied for a college place and didn’t get it. Must be a total breach of their human rights, wouldn’t happen here, sure the academics would invent some other course for them.
Ah william, you are a true politician, A waffler, just like the minister for health, he doesn’t close down anything, it’s the HSE, the HSE hands are tied by HIQA, which the minister set up. you will go far.
@martin, you’ve hit the nail on the head, denial of education is an infraction on someones human rights.
You’ll also find the range of courses available in the UK makes our cao choice look like a short shopping list and that is not the reason why participation is so low
It’s easier to take the money off the poor than the rich, the poor can’t afford solicitors and accountants to protect them from bein gscrewed, and can’t afford to leave.
A couple of interesting points come out of this video:
1. (And it feels weird for me to say this)…But fair play to that TD. The vast majority of those so called “public representatives” up in the Dail wouldnt have just called the police, they would have ordered them to batter the door down. The fact that he already took the time before this protest to speak to the students shows that to some extent he has an interest in what the problems of the people. His hands are tied by the policies of his party but hopefully he will at least voice those concerns in the Dail.
2. Well done to the student. He showed a composure beyond his years! He had facts and figures to back up his stance. “Gradutes on average pay 70% more tax”, “for every job a graduate had, two are created”. As much as I and the majority of Irish people dont like it, we are in this situation. However, the thing that is crippling us is we are trying to do as much in the short term to clear the debt without taking the long term into account. What good is it if we owe nothing and 20 or 30% of the workforce is out of work? We need a balanced solution. A little nip and tuck here and there to save some money in areas that are overfunded (e.g. upper level public sector employees) and the same funding in places that need it (e.g. education, health. etc.).
3. It pains me to see that the mentality of the mainstream media has trickled down even to Kildare Bloody TV. While that student was trying to talk logical, intelligently and help spread the knowledge that the student unions have meticulously put together, the interviewer was only interested in switching the subject back too any possible animosity between the student and the politician in the hope of getting a one line sound bite instead of proper opinions and thought out points.
I lean more towards the students in who is right on this one, but hats off to the TD in how he is handling the situation too. I dont agree with fee’s, I will never agree with them and I dont want to see them come Monday, but at least this gives me a little bit of hope that it is still a democracy we are living in. Well done to both sides of the fence.
Everybody wants everything for free in this country. If parents want children they have a responsibility to provide for them ie food clothing education etc. why should other responsible people pay for for the irresponsible ones? Look to your parents first and ask them for the money – they brought you into the world.
You’d know you were never short anyway! Get real! Education is a RIGHT and should be completely open and free. Why not look at the €700m that was paid out to unsecured bondholders last month for where the money could have potentially come from for education or other sectors of society that are facing imminent cuts?
The student grant is a joke.. I got it and like most students it was spent on everything but my ‘education’. if every student worked part time during college a grant wouldn’t be necessary.
It amazing how many student leave college without any real life work experience.. And then they are shocked when they can’t get a job! Degree doesn’t mean shite if ya can’t back it up with real life work experience!
I’m in college. I worked for the summer and had the offer of part time work once I returned to college. I couldnt do it because of my college work load. The grant is a life saver to me.
Why not? In most other developed countries there are 3rd level fees. Why should Ireland be different? When you really think about it, free 3rd level is a nice idea but is it really financially feasible? Don’t think so.
Sorry Mark, but fee’s for third level education in Ireland are the only 2nd to the UK in Europe, the only difference is we have a different title on it; registration fee and all that. All other European countries have much lower all round fee’s than ourselves and the UK.
But where are the part time jobs? I know plenty of my student friends that would happily do a few hours part time work but they ate pretty scarce at the moment,especially for those in rural areas.
@Mark, just because most other countries do it is not a good reason as many of these systems are not that good, some of these countries have awful participation rates such as the UK and the US. Free third level education is very workable, in terms of financial feasibility, we are currently spending 22b on social welfare, third level budget is 1.1b, I think in a small country such as this with a relatively low population free fees are very doable and hugely beneficial in the long term
Carers allowances, nursing home subvention, hospital beds, special needs assistants in primary school, children’s allowance…
I wish third level could be exempt but it can’t. The point made by the students about graduates paying more taxes and employing more people is a good one – but it’s an argument for charging students for the benefits they get out of third-level education.
The education budget is finite and shrinking. Direct it towards access programmes to iron out inequalities.
Students are doing a good job of fighting their corner and nobody can blame them. But the blind pension was cut last year and children with learning disabilities will have fewer support services. You can’t grease the squeakiest wheel when not everyone can storm a TD’s office in the way a gang of 20-year-olds can.
Reintroducing fees makes the education system less equal, open participation is the cornerstone of a progressive education system. The people who would suffer disproportionately would be those that do not end up paying the fees and forgoe the benefits of such an education.
The fact that graduates employ more and pay more tax is not a good reason to have a prohibitive fee to charge students for the opportunity to partake in third level education.
There are a lot of horrible things happening because of austerity, but in the interests of being fair; the current social welfare budget is just under 22b, the current public sector pay bill is also over 20b, the government are looking for votes in the next election, not for fair disbursement of austerity on this one
Fair point about the size of other, much larger, slices of the budget. I know the public sector took some hits early on but Croke Park looks out of date and more will probably have to be done. We’ve got three or four austerity budgets to come so better to cut earlier and notch up the savings every year.
I disagree with what you say about fees as a barrier to producing graduates who will create jobs. Let’s say the number of places is constant (it might not be but that’s a separate debate), we will produce a certain quantity of graduates and they will be the ones who earn most, pay most taxes and – on average – create most jobs.
The question is who should get those places and what impact fees would have. My view is that we should set fees somewhere closer to the real economic value (but maintain a subsidy) and then invest in access programmes for the least well off, plus give grants to lower-middle income families.
If fees were €10k a year the places would be filled, but filled by upper-middle class students whose parents can afford €40k for a four-year degree. That would be a disaster for equality but make no real difference to the number of graduates produced or the tax-take from those graduates in the following four decades.
If fees are €3k and there’s a low-interest loan scheme, plus an access programmes, plus means-tested grants, we still get the same number of graduates/job-creators but more evenly distributed.
Well I disagree first of all that the number of graduates would remain constant, especially in the postgraduate sector which produces by far and away the most economic benefit, saying that making course 10k a year and the same amount of people will attend I think is a bit misleading as certainly people would drop out and high earners already attend at a near 100% rate so there would be no new numbers for dropouts.
There are already fees of 2k in place and a subsidy for lower income families in the place of the grant (which should be completely overhauled).
I understand your premise of targeting lower income families more with the budget that we have but putting in place fees for everyone and then subsidizing lower income families and something like a graduate tax or low/zero cost loan scheme would be more palatable even though there are problems with these types of scheme also, and not just for students but for the national budget.
However, by having a third level system that does not discriminate on the basis of wealth to begin with (excusing the fact that sending a child to college is quite expensive, fees or no), you ensure that the opportunity to participate is evenly distributed, and I personally think this is much better than having a system whereby the wealthy are at a distinct and perpetual advantage and the government tries to subsidize those who cannot naturally afford to participate while inevitably missing out on a large chunk of those in the middle and lower middle.
I doubt we are talking about 3k as well if full fees are reintroduced,however I don’t think they will bring back fees another 500 or so on the “registration charge”.
Whenever USI, student unions or students en masse do anything the comments about it really make me laugh. They organise peaceful marches and protests and get absolutely lambasted by people who tell them they need to get real, that “the money has to come from somewhere”, “you’d be paying more in the UK”, “sure don’t they just get their parents to pay for it anyway” etc. and yet these are the same people who express outrage when their wages or welfare gets cut, or a tax is implemented/increased.
Students are calling Labour and Fine Gael out over promises they made, and again people are complaining about it. Well so far students seem to be the only group who are actually doing anything in response to what is looming for them. People always say “we need to show them we mean business”, “we should march on Leinster House” and so on, but when students actually have the conviction to do it it becomes a case of “no, get back in your box” and “typical students skipping class to do a stupid thing like protest”.
The president of the USI has FF connections, that’s well known, and plenty of the officers in the various unions are probably either members of the proper parties or their youth wings, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are seemingly the only representatives in the country who are actually doing what the people they represent want them to do. If Enda went to Brussels and told Merkozy that Ireland is against increased fiscal control introduced through new treaties would people say he’s just trying to pump up his political standing, or would they think he was doing his job and representing the people he should be?
I am totally opposed to any type of “occupation” as a means of protest, just passed occupy cork and they are having a dance party in one of their tents, I wish we lived in a democracy where the majority are listened to! The majority doesn’t support a tented community in our cities or throwing out a TD from his office where he can help ordinary law abiding citizens like me…
We are listened too by, but only if it’s something they want to hear. Like the referendum we were asked twice. As for the “tented community” what bothers you and other so much ? I bet you wished you had the balls to get out there too but instead you’re staying in your closet. I mean whats the worse they can do? Have you had a chat with any of them ?
ah here now “Banterpolice O’Conell” – Those guys were having a bit of a party after organising a march of over a thousand people earlier on that day. Also, they were celebrating their 50th day of survival as an occupation. If the system was built to listen to people, there’d never be any need for occupations – but thats not the case, so direct action becomes necessary.
Yeah I’m sure your student leaders are brilliant I mean they follow an illustrious crew, the likes of bill Clinton, Eamonn Gilmore, joe Duffy, Mary harney, to name a few… Why should I listen to ye ye are all only wannabe politicians who will join the system
Same thing happened to Paul Gogarthy in Lucan who is now a wannabe singer celeb Banisteoir & more importantly a political Has been Gob Shite !!!!!! For This TD The Writing Is On The Wall
Sooooo many petty comments here!! A few good ones don’t get me wrong but so many people miss the point completely!! How can we live in a society where the 1% even exist?? Stop holdin back progress!! This is a global opinion shared by sooooo many!! Ok your opinion isn’t shared by the people who support the occupy movement but maybe try changing your opinion an see the good in what has an will be achieved from it!! Since when has standing up for what’s right been wrong??
Let’s see how many dis-likes this one gets?? Ha
Oh an on a side note… Is it jus me or does the TD look like will ferrel impersonating George bush jnr?? Jus my opinion!! :)
Well said Colm and very honest. Some kids are too young to appreciate college. I would have loved to go but due to serious illness as a child, I didn’t get a chance and then life events took over (kids etc, need to work for same). I think the ‘fees’ as they are are reasonably fair (I had two in college, one just finished and one in last year). A lot of people in this country expect a lot for free!
My young sister is a grant holding student of NUI Maynooth who has to travel up from Limerick and back every week. Without the grant it would not be possible for her to pursue her goals. The student union folks occupying the office in Naas have my full support as do all the students up and down the country.
I’m sorry, but there’s plenty of other pressing issues of poverty & joblessness that this TD’s constituency office is needed for, and the students need to leave. If not voluntarily than they need to be removed by legal means. I don’t believe in Direct Action, which this is, and Gardai would be entirely justified to remove the protesters.
What I’ll say is that I fluffed my days in college. I wish I had moved out of home & learned to be self sufficient *before* I stepped near it. I wish people were forced to take a year out and be forced to live a year learning to be self sufficient before going into college. So many go to college not thinking of what they are doing and just plodding along with no real interest in what they are doing in class, but “going through the motions” for the sake of a social life.
We need to begin discouraging the “you don’t need to work, sure miss the class and go paintballing instead” culture of college life. If you’re not in lecture, you shouldn’t be in college. Why should you get the place of someone who’s there to learn so he/she can support a family they already have?
My one big regret? I wish I’d found the mature students & hung out with them. They fought their way back into education, they know its value. If there’s a class worth going to, the matures won’t miss it.
The days of a free ride are over sadly . It’s nice to have it and maybe in the future we can have it again but the population is too small and we can’t expect the hard pressed tax payer to foot the bill for kids they dont have , in some cases .
If you have kids , if you don’t well it’s simple , you don’t !!!
Future students should look to study near their place of birth if they can’t afford to live away from home. You don’t have to study at a particular uni to get on in life. Fair enough for specialised courses but you could do an arts degree anywhere
You’ve had your USI protest what more do you honestly want? All this is doing is affecting one man and his staff, a bit pointless no?? Stop jumping on USI’s FAILED bandwaggon of occupying offices, that was an epic fail, & what your doing isn’t too far off it!
Death toll from Myanmar earthquake rises to over 1,000 people as international aid arrives
Updated
53 mins ago
9.8k
Set The Tone
Denmark criticises 'tone' of Vance's Greenland comments after US takeover suggested during visit
53 mins ago
2.7k
arctic reception
JD Vance says US take over of Greenland ‘makes sense’ during scaled back visit
Updated
17 hrs ago
54.6k
147
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say