Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
The post mortem
This outgoing minister gave us a brutal assessment of where it all went wrong for Labour
Aodhán Ó Ríordáin explained why the seeds of Labour’s demise were sown in 2011 in a wide-ranging interview with TheJournal.ie this week.
8.30pm, 22 Mar 2016
28.0k
74
Actually, funnily, bizarrely, the last couple of weeks, since I lost my seat, it’s actually… it’s a little bit of a release. It’s kind of hard to describe.
AS A TD, AODHÁN Ó Ríordáin spent the last five years constantly worrying about his seat, then the worst happened.
After an epic count, lasting several days in the RDS last month, the Labour junior minister, like so many of his colleagues across the country, was relieved of his duties by the voters of Dublin Bay North.
It was a rollercoaster of a weekend. Ó Ríordáin and his team thought for some time that he was going to be okay. But he was unseated after failing to secure sufficient transfers in a crowded field of 20 candidates.
Aodhán Ó Ríordáin in the RDS with senator Mairia Cahill last month. Cianan Brennan / TheJournal.ie
Cianan Brennan / TheJournal.ie / TheJournal.ie
It was a dreadful election for Labour and despite that personal release from seat anxiety, it was hard to see so many of his colleagues turfed out by an unforgiving electorate.
Everything Ó Ríordáin believed over the last few years, everything he worked to achieve as a Labour TD and then as a minister of state for new communities, culture equality, and drugs strategy was rejected. It hurts him a lot.
“I am so proud of what we’ve done over the last number of years and I’ve fully committed myself to it and I fully believe in it,” Ó Ríordáin told TheJournal.ie this week.
Then you come to an election where it’s been soundly rejected. It’s soundly rejected by the people and coming to that realisation is pretty harsh.
Ó Ríordáin on what it’s been like since he lost his seat:
“You’re so convinced about something that you join a party, you manage to get yourself elected, you’re involved in it for five years, you’re a minister of state for a period of time, you fully believe in the project and then what you believe in, you get the personal rejection, but you’re [also] roundly rejected.
Everything you’ve been saying for five years has just been absolutely rejected by the people, in the most spectacular way. It’s difficult to pick up the pieces from that.
Labour’s demise was well-flagged. The party, despite its own spin, was on course for a wallop at the polls. But the scale of the collapse was still surprising to many political observers as it won just seven seats, having returned with 37 in 2011.
Ó Ríordáin said it was a strange election, which “was passing people by” even as he and his political colleagues were all busy knocking on doors and arguing on the airwaves. Many voters he encountered were undecided about who to vote for, even as late as the night before going to the ballots.
Where did it go wrong?
But the seeds of Labour’s collapse were sown five years ago, he believes. That is a view shared by many commentators who have pointed to the infamous ‘Every Little Hurts’ Tesco ad in the dying days of the 2011 campaign as a point where the party made it promises it would be unable to honour.
[The Tesco ad] just showed the kind of the panic that set in to the campaign in 2011 and then you go from that, I mean, I think there was a massive sense of disappointment in 2011 that we only got 19%, that we only got 37 seats.
“I think there was a sense at the beginning of the campaign that this [was] serious breakthrough territory. This [was] going to be 50 or 60 seats territory for the Labour party. Maybe not 60, but certainly in and around major breakthrough point.
So when we got what we got there was almost a sense of disappointment, and from then on it was as if we were always on the back foot.
As someone who has a keen interest in education, Ó Ríordáin also identified Ruairí Quinn’s decision to sign a USI pledge not to increase student fees during the last election as a promise broken when he became education minister.
Leon Farrell / Photocall Ireland
Leon Farrell / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
“I remember that week. We were all told: ‘Absolutely do not sign, pledge or promise anything because the country is in hoc and we’ve no money.’ When I saw that I thought: ‘What’s he doing that for?’
So, not to blame Ruairi – that was his decision to make in that week but it did kind of give us, as candidates, a sense that there [was] a level of desperation seeping into this campaign here. We thought we were going to do an awful lot better.
During that campaign, there was also ‘Frankfurt’s way or Labour’s way’ – then leader Eamon Gilmore’s infamous insistence that his party would not kowtow to the Troika.
O Ríordáin believes Labour should have made more of the fact that the party raised the minimum wage and protected core social welfare payments, against the will of its EU/IMF paymasters.
“We could have easily presented to people a number of things that Frankfurt wanted that they didn’t get. From the minimum wage, to the €1.7 billion extra in social welfare cuts, the €600 million extra in tax increases that they wanted, the promissory note,” he said.
We could have listed things that Frankfurt wanted that they didn’t get, but we didn’t do it.
The Kelly factor and Fine Gael’s ‘catastrophe’
He’s reluctant to talk about Alan Kelly’s controversial role in the more recent election campaign.
The Labour deputy leader gave an ill-advised interview to the Sunday Independent in which he said, among other things, that power “is a drug” that suits him. Kelly also faced claims that he verbally attacked Newstalk presenter Chris Donoghue, just one example of how his abrasive style raised many eyebrows.
Kelly has an ego, Ó Ríordáin said, as does everyone in politics (he included himself here). But when pushed on what he really thinks of the outgoing Environment Minister, he had something to say:
Furthermore, Labour ended up aligned closely to a party that had an “absolutely catastrophic” campaign.
Whatever campaign we had was in some way aligned to that. So from the overreach on USC – which nobody bought – to the €2 billion that they couldn’t find in their figures, to the Michael Lowry thing – which was again a mistake – to the debates, that were okay but not brilliant, to the ‘whingers’ comment.
“It just went from bad to worse and so, while we expected not to do as well as 2011, a bit like the local elections, Fine Gael did an awful lot worse than they were expecting. So we had hitched ourselves, I suppose, to a re-elect the government message.”
Should Labour have apologised for the broken promises in that Tesco ad and others? Would a bit of humility have benefitted the party at the polls? Ó Ríordáin isn’t so sure:
Then you’re making the narrative about apologies and how we haven’t lived up to expectations whereas there was so many things we felt we were doing.
What now?
With seven seats and, as it sees it, no mandate to govern, Labour will go into opposition and seek to rebuild.
Ó Ríordáin believes the question over Joan Burton’s leadership doesn’t arise right now as there are so many imponderables about the formation of the next government.
But he seems pretty downbeat about the party’s prospects if a second election was to be called soon. What message can Labour go to the doors with this time around that would entice people to vote for it, he wonders.
It begs the question as to whether the party can survive at all after the worst election in its 104-year history. Ó Ríordáin seemed slightly hesitant when we asked:
A referendum on the Eighth Amendment, which Labour has championed in recent years, will not now happen, Ó Ríordáin believes. He will continue to campaign for it, but sees no prospect of Fine Gael, in a minority government, pursuing the thorny issue of abortion.
“A minority Fine Gael government is not going to open up that can of worms,” he said.
Do you think a minority government, led by Fine Gael, supported or facilitated by Fianna Fáil, is actually going to grasp the thorny nettle of an Eighth Amendment referendum? Not in a million years.
Ó Ríordáin is also worried that the campaign for a living wage of €11.30 is now dead in the water and that the pledge to reduce class sizes to a ratio of 20:1 will fall by the wayside.
His own future may lie in the Seanad if he’s elected next month, but when it comes to the bigger picture, Ó Ríordáin believes that politics is in flux and that centre left politics, a space that Labour likes to occupy, “is in crisis”.
“Centrist politics is certainly in trouble and centre left politics is in crisis. Certainly in Ireland,” he said.
I think I care too much to walk away but… I may be pointed to walk away, or I may have an opportunity to stick around. But look, I think the issues that I care about are too important to walk away from.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
That’s one of the reasons I voted to get rid of it but oh no, people were mouthing on about reforming the kip. In 70 years noone has ever reformed the seanad and never will.a once in a lifetime chance to shut down this money wasting dump wasted
I wonder if it bothers him that Joan Burton and Alan Kelly managed to hang onto their seats and him and so many of his colleagues got shown the door by voters, largely by the actions and attitude of the two mentioned,, if labour wants to rebuild, first thing the party needs to do is show them two the door……..
@ jane “So did Padraig McLoughlin. They are all the same.”
Sinn Fein wanted reform, in the absence of that option being offered in the referendum, it campaigned for abolition with the intent to create a more inclusive and reformed second house.
A million miles away from the grubby little powergrab attempted by FG/Labour.
Unbelievable he says their failure was over a poster five years ago???!!! Labour let a lot of people down. They were voted in to temper FG not cheerlead for them. How about looking at all the promises you broke (water was apparently a redline issue if you can believe that!).
Maybe because they had to jane, because they were the minority party. It’s easy to canvass and make promises when in opposition, it’s tougher when you are in a coalition and reality sets in.
I didn’t vote for either party – but with the choices now, and when you look at where we were in 2011, we did achieve stability. Which is one thing we don’t have now.
I’m not saying they didn’t stabilise the economy but I think the price in some cases was too high. I’m not talking about IW, that was just a bullshit bandwagon that everyone jumped on but they’ve made a mess of the housing situation and there were some very cruel cuts to certain areas. I don’t understand why at some stage labour didn’t say no, even if that meant pulling out of government.
Ah the banker, bond holders do not have a vote. Appointing Marie Cahill to the Seanad ahead of all Irish people who hold a passport for Ireland unlike Marie Cahill and were not members of the Ira like Marie Cahill was the most pathetic thing Labour done to get one up on Sine Fein while labour were being used and laughed at by Fine Gael the party of PR for the elite.
Take the message labour the Irish people do not want you.
None of the important issues labour tried to own have gone away and without a Labour Party supporting Tory policy’s these issues will be addressed. Labour lost the local elections, filled seats on state boards six months before they became advailable and ran around empty streets in the dark during the election. Media outlets showed them visiting schools because children would not ask why a homeless crisis was allowed to escalate into a nightmare for so many family’s, a health care crisis making a 9 hours waiting time for a&e an improvement, a planning enquiry stopped, whistleblowers silenced and a leader who promised reform but admitted he personally championed cronyism. the unions where the only winners but then again they put money in every labour deputies pocket. All the Labour Party is left with, is a joke for a leader, a power junkie as a deputy leader and a couple of lucky bast@rds to even get a voice in the next dail. The working man has spoken now F off you champagne socialist and cry your craocodile tears on your own time.
”What message can Labour go to the doors with this time around that would entice people to vote for it, he wonders.”
What does it matter what promises any of these pathological lying parasites who bleed us dry come to our doors with? It is all BS and lies anyway. You need a better gimmick next time Amadan. Johnny Giles didn’t do the business for you, time to call Peter Andres agent. No doubt you have enough of our money squirreled away to afford his fee.
Why is this guy still being given access to the public airways?
Saw Averil Power on Vincent Browne last night still banging on about her ‘achievements’ as a senator.
Two chancers who surfed the wave of political correctness at the expense of more important matters of public concern.
And it backfired badly.
The people have spoken.
Get lost.
Isn’t this the joker who insisted that we take in around 4000 “refugees” then said that number might rise to around 20,000 possibly more and if you didn’t agree with him it’s because you are islamaphobic?
Man oh man – he still doesn’t get it even if they kept basic social welfare payments and min wage the same the cost of everything plus water bills etc +23% vat all went through the roof – media backed spoofer and now Varaker backs another rejected Indo girl if I don’t like it I cry foul – we are not a stupid electorate we got rid of these 2 for good reasons now buzz off and take varadker with you
So he lost his job like thousands of others do but for him it’s a calamity and we should all stop what we’re doing and pay homage to his greatness. I don’t understand why we have such a fixation on these people, they’re like the Irish version of the fixation the English have with the royal family.
Think about it. There is a party called the “Labour Party”. That would suggest that it is a Party espousing pro labour policies. Instead, the actual policies supported by the Labour Party are strong neo-liberal and pro capital policies. There is too much dissonance in that.
The new name of the Labour Party might be “The Party formerly known as the Labour Party” .
We keep hearing FF/FG are one and the same. I think it should be FF/FG/Labour are one and the same. Labour behaved more like right of centre than any of the others.
The Party some of us voted for and believed in sold out its core values and failed its supporters..end of. If i failed miserably in my job I’d be sacked. No cushy pay off or a chance to join another gravy train. I’m sorry ex-minister, I have zero sympathy for you or your party.
I agree for Connolly but on the other hand he pushed the bully campaigner Higgins to the waste side so that’s a bit of good news but would love to know will they be sticking with the dissident ms Cahill
Amazing that he is only now coming to realise that the outrageous false promises made before the previous election were a huge mistake, when most of us knew within a few days of the last election that they would come back to haunt labour.
He does not realize that you can cod some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time any body that does know that show a very small level of intelligence
A is this the same man who was calling for the Seanad to be abolished ? And what about the privatisation of Irish water ? And the water tax the played a huge part in the destruction of the so called Labour Party . And if he’s really stuck for the start he always has Jobs bridge .
Denis, the supervised injection centres he proposed were an excellent idea which would have saved many lives of those most vulnerable in society.
O’Riordans position on the failed drug policy was progressive and welcome.
Unfortunately his online censorship proposals tipped the balance against him.
It’s crazy that he lost his seat and still gets paid as a minister . Kenny or the dail should have to appoint a temporary replacement while the government is in transition.
He supported Labour policies in government. (and Fine Gael)
A patronising, arrogant, bullish elective dictatorship riding roughshod over the citizens of this republic all the while deluding themselves that their political future in government was a certainty coz nobody wanted the Fianna Fail bogeymen back in power.
Now look.
Reality bit him in the Aras.
Say what you like but the country is in a much better shape now than it was when FG+Lab took power. The people that voted FF in this election are beyond help. Absolute dullards.
Quite a lot of people lost everything including their homes, family, jobs, even lives after the last FF government. To claim that the country isn’t in a better shape now than it was in 2010/2011 is simply false Les.
And you believe it’s all down to Enda/Eamon and Joan do you? Ireland is the only country that is better shape since 2011? This would be the same lot when in opposition criticized FF because they weren’t spending more. If you believe FG/Labour would have done differently if they were in power at that time, then you are fooling yourself.
I don’t blame you Oisin, you just seem to be caught under this false impression that there is a difference between FG and FF, you’re obviously not alone. Corruption, cronyism, expensive quangos, still seems the same to me.
Aodhán Ó Ríordáin it was Michael Noonan lost you the Election.
You have a very shallow understanding of why Gov was rejected in Election 2106.
You failed to understand the difference between Regressive and Progressive taxes.
Regressive Taxes are those not related to ability to pay, provide no exemptions, fail to allow for appeal AND Revenue can take the tax from people’s pay, pensions and also from their Medical Expenses refunds …. yeah Aodhán .. you didnt notice that one!)
- LPT … at your peril pretend there is acceptance of this tax which is regressive and hated. Italy abolished its LPT on Family Homes in 2015
- Car Tax .. the most regressive car tax in EU . ignored. €710 p.a v €280 p.a for those who can afford new cars.
(Labour voters subsidising the Car Tax and Water Tax of the wealthy … ignored completely by Labour&FG.) https://www.change.org/p/unfair-car-tax-law/dashboard
- Water Tax … water is essential to life like food, air, “childrens shoes” … get it Aodhán
- IT .. now abolished in Sweden and other EU countries … an odious law.
- FTT ( now there is a progressive tax on the banks ignored by Labour) introduced in 11 other EU countries.
Progressive, fair, appropriate (not on essentials to life), moderate taxes acceptable to fund public services. Noonan lost you the Election.
So get your self a dictionary and understand the difference between regressive and progressive taxes and then you may find “stability” in your political life and system. Until this is clearly understood by politicians be prepared for instability.
Aodhán .. all politics is local … and there is nothing more local than peoples wallets. Michael Noonan lost you the Election with odious hated disgraceful regressive taxes … LPT, Car Tax, WT, IT ….
Progressive, appropriate, fair and moderate taxes to fund public services. Labour must have listened to “Economists” ….. not the sharpest knives in the drawer as we all well know!
If people really wanted Labour to do what it promised to do in 2011 then the people would have given Labour a mandate to do it. The reality is that the people gave a greater mandate to FG. So blaming Labour for everything and not giving them a sufficient mandate to do anything sounds a bit ridiculous.
Always had an admiration for politicians that would stick their heads above the parapets on controversial issues like refugees & drug policy rather than trying to be all things to all people to all people.Was glad to see labour get hit hard, but thinks it’s harsh for people to put O Riordain in the same category as egotistical me feiners like Alan Kelly, Pat Rabbitte & Ruairi Quinn
The US Commerce Secretary says Ireland runs a 'tax scam'. Does he have a point?
Paul O'Donoghue
7 hrs ago
8.3k
59
Crunch time
Harris holding a series of meetings with European trade ministers
4 mins ago
3
0
mallow
Two women dead and two children injured following collision in Cork
Updated
12 hrs ago
41.8k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say