Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
who are the champions
From the Greens to exit polls: Here are the winners and losers of the elections
There are some very interesting takeaways from this batch of various votes.
9.30am, 2 Jun 2019
19.0k
55
THE ELECTIONS ARE all but done and dusted (no one mention Ireland South) – so what did we learn?
For a start, that transfers don’t always go where you expect them to, and exit polls aren’t gospel, especially if turnout is in doubt.
NB: An obvious list of winners and losers would be those elected vs those who weren’t -this is a bit more nuanced.
Winners
Saoirse McHugh
So proud of @saoirse_mchugh who has polled 51,000 first preference votes in the Midlands-North-West. #EP2019 She ran a brilliant campaign and deserves real credit for helping create a Green wave of thinking, right across the country in recent weeks. pic.twitter.com/KxPpTDKB7d
It’s quite a feat to be a star of a national election and to not get elected.
But that’s what Saoirse McHugh did – after appearing on RTÉ’s Prime Time just three days before the election, she won over voters who hadn’t known of her before.
At one point during that RTÉ debate, Peter Casey tried to speak over McHugh, who responded by saying: “Millionaires scapegoating migrants is an old trope and it’s boring.”
In the end, the Achill native got 50,000 first preference votes, and had 61,000 by the time she was eliminated in Count 11. Her appearance on Prime Time is thought to have also boosted the Greens’ Ciarán Cuffe’s vote in Dublin, where he topped the poll.
With a general election on the cards for later this year, and after her comments pledging to quit the party if they went into coalition with either Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael, all eyes are on where McHugh will focus her political capital next.
Local media
This is how you do journalism. A masterclass in one story by @noelbaker1: 'Last Cork councillor is elected by a single vote after four days of counting' https://t.co/wEtOGAxZhE
We can easily take for granted the extent of the wide network of dedicated local media that are dotted across the country – but they’re hard to miss on count day.
Videoing the newly elected being hoisted onto shoulders, interviewing those who missed out about what went wrong, and following the nail-biting recounts that resulted in some councillors being elected by a margin of just one, they were the life-blood that pumped out updates in an seemingly endless election count.
A thank you from all national and Dublin-based journalists, and for those living in the capital that could watch updates from their home county (hello, East Coast FM).
Naomi Long
Liam McBurney
Liam McBurney
History was made when Naomi Long was elected as the first non-partisan MEP for Northern Ireland. Three women also occupy Northern Ireland’s three MEP seats for the first since the region became part of the European ideal.
Traditionally, Northern Ireland’s MEPs have been held by two unionists and one nationalist. The European Parliament had originally given the region two seats, but added a third so that nationalists would be represented.
Long’s win is a massive boon for the Alliance Party – giving citizens in Northern Ireland that don’t want to play a part in the partisan politics a chance to be represented, particularly with Brexit looming over the horizon.
We laughed at that Tamagotchi campaign video, but it – coupled with the not-so insignificant wave of support for Mairéad McGuinness – worked in the end, and Maria Walsh finished in the third seat in the Midlands-NorthWest area (ahead of incumbent MEP Matt Carthy).
Despite an uninspiring Prime Time debate performance, Walsh held a widespread campaign where she vowed to represent the young generation that mobilised to campaign in favour of marriage equality, the Repeal the Eighth campaign, as well as struggling farmers and resource-starved communities in rural Ireland.
Rumours are abound that she might not even finish her five-year term in the European Parliament, as Varadkar might summon her to run for the Dáil in the not-too-distant general election.
Middle of the Road
Peter Casey
Advertisement
PA Wire / PA Images
PA Wire / PA Images / PA Images
Finishing as a runner up in the Midlands Northwest constituency, Casey did far better in the final result than the RTÉ exit poll suggested. More people voted for him than was expected, even though they weren’t happy to admit it, even under anonymity.
Casey has now failed to be elected in two elections in the space of a year, but has finished on stronger numbers than most people would have expected.
He has said that he’s now setting his sights on the Dáil – will he win that round?
Its councillor candidates soared ahead in the local elections, making gains on the significant chunk of local authority seats they had previously held. Fine Gael also did well, but lost its hold in Dublin, which will worry the party leadership slightly.
In the European elections, Fianna Fáil didn’t fare as it would have liked. It ran five MEP candidates, and just two of them have been elected – one of whom, Barry Andrews, got the Dublin Brexit seat, which he can’t take up for some time.
Ahead of the election, Fianna Fáil was asked did it fear Peter Casey would suck votes away from its two candidates in the Midlands-NorthWest area, to which Mícheál Martin answered he wasn’t worried. After Casey finished well ahead of both those candidates, you’d have to say they probably should have been concerned.
The exit polls got it a bit wrong, especially on Saoirse McHugh winning a seat in the Midlands-NorthWest and the extent to which Ciarán Cuffe was ahead of the other candidates in Dublin (pre election polls had him at 11%, the exit poll put him at 23%, and the actual first preference result was 17%).
They also severely underestimated Luke Ming Flanagan and Peter Casey – but why?
Richard Colwell, of Red C Research, which conducted the exit poll for RTÉ, said the low turnout in Dublin was to blame.
“Dublin didn’t turn out, its turnout was lower than the rest of the country. There were only 22% of the electorate’s votes cast in Dublin, versus 26% in the rest of the country.”
The highest turnout was in Connaught and Ulster, where it reached over 50%. Colwell said that if turnout isn’t evenly spread or doesn’t match trends, then it skews the exit poll – and there isn’t much that can be done about that.
“We can’t predict turnout,” he said.
Eoghan Murphy
“You can stick your co-living up your arse” protesters chant at Housing Minister Eoghan Murphy at count centre pic.twitter.com/4BaiyBIEuJ
But in a week where the election and ‘swinggate’ took over almost every conversation, his comments that co-living was an “exciting” opportunity for people still stuck.
Two days in a row, in the height of the counting on Saturday and Sunday, protesters gathered at the RDS and formed a circle around Murphy to call for his resignation and to chant “stick your co-living up your arse”. A clear message if ever there was one.
Sinn Féin
Matt Carthy, Michelle O'Neill, Mary Lou McDonald, Lynn Boylan and Martina Anderson at the launch of their Euro election manifesto. Niall Carson
Niall Carson
Well, I don’t think anyone would argue with this ranking.
Sinn Féin members themselves will be the first to admit that they had a bad election result. It lost 78 council seats, and lost two of its three MEP seats in Ireland (notwithstanding the recount in Ireland South, and Martina Anderson being reelected in the North).
Added to that, a number of councillors that resigned from the party in recent years, some of whom citing alleged bullying and other issues to do with management within the party, were reelected as independents.
The party leadership has said that it couldn’t get its members out to vote in this election; Lynn Boylan told RTÉ that Sinn Féin voters “couldn’t be bothered” going out to vote, and that the same level of anti-austerity “anger” wasn’t there. But looking at the Eoghan Murphy protest, you’d have to wonder if that was the only issue.
Interestingly, Solidarity-People Before Profit also fared badly in the elections, losing over half their total councillors, suggesting that the far-left voter’s support went elsewhere in this election, or just didn’t cast their vote at all.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Great to see SF and the always angry PBP doing so poorly. The Irish economy is continuing to do well and the appeal of the anti everything political groups is lessening.
@Jurgen Remak: record homelessness and record numbers of people on hospital trolleys suggest differently, the propaganda leading up to the election was sickening. By the looks of it ff would fair quite well if a general election was called by the end of the year.
@Jurgen Remak: Do you call the continuance of the transfer of wealth from the public to the billionaires and multi millionaires, ‘continuing to do well’..?
@Jurgen Remak: Why then did FG only win back 20 seats out of the 105 seats they lost in 2014 Local elections?
Why are you ignoring ongoing National emergencies in homelessness, housing and health,etc?SF&other Opposition politicians constantly highlight these serious issues affecting the public!
@Nuala Mc Namara:
Why don’t you try putting out the complete picture Nuala rather than cherry picking the numbers that suit your argument?
The 105 seats lost by FG in 2014 were largely gains from 2009 when, after the recession started FFs vote collapsed (they lost 160), a trend that continued into the GE in 2011. By 2014 FF had recovered, again seen in the GE of 2016.
Before 2009 FF had an element of centre left vote, especially in Dublin, they lost that to lab by 2011, it moved on to SF in 2016 and it looks like it’s on the move again.
@Patrick Nolan: Are you Jurgen Remak?He commented ‘the economy is continuing to do well’s so I asked HIM why did FG only win back 20 seats out of the 105 seats they lost in 2014 Local elections!
By the way ‘the complete picture’ includes acknowledging the National emergencies in homelessness, housing and health affecting the public!!
@Nuala Mc Namara:
So you post a comment on a public forum and other people are not allowed to comment on it??
SORRREEE!!!
Your asking why FG only gained 20 seats, can I ask you, why did SF lose 80???
@Patrick Nolan: I was interested in hearing Jurden Remak’s reply to my comment to him,so no need for you to be childish&twist that to suit your agenda!
I don’t know why SF lost 78 seats of the 105 they won in 2014 Local elections,they had 59 seats before 2014 that ,now they have 81 seats.
The writing was on the wall for S/F, when they did not take their seats in the House of Commons, and fight for Irelands case. If they had, their vote would have been very different.
@Matthew Roche: The SF vote wouldn’t have made any difference to the present outcome because of the make up of the British parliament. The collapse of the institutions in Northern Ireland and the current stand off with the DUP in getting them back on track, would probably have had more of an impact than events across the water. They were voted in on the basis of abstention and have stuck to that principle. The electorate here are crying out for a third party to put their trust in. Labour were that party until they sold their soul by backing the FG way. SF took their place and did well in the previous elections. This time around the public were given a new idea that green is the way forward. Green policies for sure.. but remember what happened the last time they held the balance of power.
@Paul Linehan: They May have been voted in up North due to the basis of abstention, but the continuation of that stance has damaged their vote down here.
@Steve O’Reilly: Their vote in the British parliament wouldn’t have changed anything. I find it amusing that Trump is glorified for keeping election promises, but the same doesn’t apply to SF…. I’m not a supporter of the party. But believe in giving credit where credit is due.
@Steve O’Reilly: Mary Lou damaged their vote, old school Republicans wouldn’t vote for abortion,she excluded the older SF supporters and finished her own career bandwagon jumping
The opinion polling industry is a lucrative one. Its findings often get banner headlines. Its expensive, privately commissioned opinion polls are scrutinised meticulously by strategy committees of mainstream political parties. I suggest that the opinion poll industry be scrutinised deeply and objectively by investigative journalists.
@KJmadra.:
The Daft Greens have No Carbon Tax or VAT on Jet Fuel but tax people trying to get to work. They shot our petrol cars which have less carbon emissions if owned for 12 years than electric cars changed every 3 years and forced us into dirty noxious diesels. Now they want to shoot the cows in the fields!
@Neuville-Kepler62F: Petrol engine’s have higher Co2 than diesels, Co2 is what’s bad for the atmosphere, the nox from diesels is what’s bad for people in built up places. new euro emissions 6 diesels have reduced that down alot that they won’t be banned from built up areas. Euro emissions 7 and onwards will be a game changer.
Maria Walsh is a total spoofer. Watched their election speeches – Ming and Carthy leagues better, their speeches focusing on rural Ireland and Brexit, while Walsh’s focused on the need for more “female farmers”. Car crash. Why do we keep electing such tossers?
Sitting on the fence, and more often than not, shouting abuse from the sidelines, was always going to eventually hit Sinn Fein.
“Loaves and fishes” policies, with free everything with less taxation, is the SF mantra.
People are not fools!
@sean de paore:
1)Give a link to Sign Fein’s ‘free everything’ policies &’less taxation’ policies!
2)Sein Fein voted in Dail against Government backing Apple appeal!
Why are comments closed concerning the resignation of a blueshirt councillor in Donegal after being elected last week ,If it had been a Sinn Fein candidate it would be open season.
WHY is there so much attention to the Greens……………..They did NOT do well. $5 of Councillors and 1 MEP does not make a F$%king Green wave………………….I am sick of hearing this BS
@M Stuart: the big winner from the european elections is some wan out west who failed to get elected according to this publication, seemingly unaware of the concept of winning in electoral politics.
FF and FG got 25% each. Turnout was 50%. If the whole electorate came out and voted, the FF and FG support could really be as low as 12 – 13% each. This means that 75% of the electorate are looking for sombody else to vote for. Just one new party that can get 15% of the electorates support and FFG would be toast. Yet mehole and leo want you to believe there is nobody but FF and FG and their support is closer to 50% each. Somebody please stand up because these FFG idiots are doing nothing but making themselves rich while in leinster house.
@Adrian: with your genius logic you could equally argue if everyone voted they would have about 37% of the votes each… your assuming everyone who didn’t vote would not vote ff or fg which is incorrect
@Barry Somers: yes its analysis to the limits. But, you’re bias is in saying people are too lazy to vote. We should be asking, why was turnout so low? why did some people decide not to vote? Why don’t we have compulsary voting like the aussies do? Does low turnout skew the results in favour of FFG? What are the real political views of the electorate in this country? And can we achieve politicial representation that represents the majority of the people on this country rather than the 30% that FFG represent?
@Adrian: I can’t believe you took the time to write out such tosh.
Let me give you the alternative numbers…. (equally as bad as yours). 50% of people didn’t bother vote…. That means they are generally happy with the way things are as they didn’t feel motivated enough to go out to vote for any kind of change. So if you add that 50% to the 50% of actual voters who voted for FG or FF….. That means they have 75% support.
Complete garbage of course…. But just as valid as your own calculations.
@Adrian: Very wishful thinking there Adrian. Let’s look at it this way. The turnout for the locals in 2014 was almost identical to 2019, only 1.4% of a difference. The thing is this time when the voters came out to vote they had wised up to Sinn Fein and Solidarity/PBP when the collapse in their vote. You see being anti everything only gets you so far.
@Adrian™: you don’t think much of my analysis, you should have heard finance minister donoghues interview on newstalk during the week. It was pathetic. He looked really amateur and small with his percentages and figures when all the interviewer had to say was, 2 billion, 3 billion wasted, and donogue saying we saved 20 million on this and 50 million on that.
@Barry Somers: A lot of people don’t vote as they don’t see anyone to represent them, Politicians are seen as either attention seekers or sleazy gobshytes. Under 30s are angry that they can’t get houses and most of their mates are in Canada or Australia, those between 30 and 60 are angry because no matter what they do they can’t get ahead, and the old people are basically told to f off and die. Can you see why many don’t see any point in voting.
The Daft Greens have No Carbon Tax or VAT on Jet Fuel but tax people trying to get to work. They shot our petrol cars which have less carbon emissions if owned for 12 years than electric cars changed every 3 years and forced us into dirty noxious diesels. Now they want to shoot the cows in the fields!
Adjective. onanistic (comparative more onanistic, superlative most onanistic) Of or pertaining to masturbation (onanism). In a manner which suggests masturbation; hence, fruitless, self-congratulatory, self-absorbed, pointless.
And to this, we can exit polls (and the full day of tedious media speculation that follows before actual results come in). Red C? Dead C more like…
EU elections irrelevant as voting patterns skewed by oversized constituencies and a job that basically involves collecting money for doing nothing, local elections skewed as voters likely to give votes to their neighbours irrelevant of party.
@Cathal:
While you are right about the EU election, that’s has more to do with personalities than parties the results of the 2014 locals were almost identical to the results of the 2016 GE for the three main parties
The biggest winners were the Independent4change with both Clare Daly and Mick Wallace winning seats in Europe. The resistance goes from strength to strength.
Monaghan show smarts to close out Division 2 final
The 42
44 mins ago
1.1k
1
Research
Trinity warns staff not to answer US government request for diversity and equality information
15 hrs ago
47.9k
140
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say